資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.144.181.249)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
臺灣企業集團的發展是漸趨同形嗎?
書刊名:
臺大管理論叢
作者:
洪世章
/
陳忠賢
作者(外文):
Hung, Shih-chang
/
Chen, Chung-hsien
出版日期:
2000
卷期:
11:1
頁次:
頁73-101
主題關鍵詞:
組織同形
;
代理理論
;
資源基礎理論
;
多角化
;
組織社會學
;
Organizational isomorphism
;
Agency theory
;
Resource-based theory of the firm
;
Diversification
;
Organizational sociology
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
5
) 博士論文(0) 專書(
1
) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
4
共同引用:0
點閱:95
本文探討臺灣10大企業集團的發展是否漸趨於組織同形。本研究從經濟學相關領域的單一市場與技術命定論出發,認為廠商彼此之間會有同形的情況發生。接著,吾人引用代理理論與資源基礎理論的觀點提出,廠商會追求多角化成長策略,因此廠商通當不會只在一個市場競爭,或只受制於單一技術典範洗禮。在這種多重制度規範限制下,廠商間因而可能會有分化現象。然而此種從市場或技術命定論所推演出的廠商多角化,對於堅稱社會制度決定論將超越市場或技術命定論的組織社會學而言,可能只是一種多角化同形的結果。為了探討此種組織多角化同形效果是否會發生,本文從多元尺度分析法引伸設計出廠商之間之同形係數,以比較彼此之間之差異程度。本研究實證結果初步顯示,臺灣企業集團過去二十年來的發展,雖然歷經一連串不同程度的多角化活動,但似確有漸趨同形多角化的現象。
以文找文
This paper aims to examine whether Taiwan's ten large business groups are moving towards isomorphism. Drawing on the perspective of market and technological determinism, it argues that firms operating in the same market and performing the same technology have a tendency to move towards isomorphism. But given agency theory and the resource-based theory of the firm, firms will pursue diversification growth strategies. As a result, they will operate in multiple markets, and their structures and activities will be channeled through a variety of technological paradigms. Diversity is thus possible. However, from the viewpoint of organizational sociology, this kind of diversification is not a form of organizational diversity, but a form of isomorphism in diversification-that is, the extent to which firms pursue diversification is isomorphic with one another. In order to testify this proposition, we develop the notion of isomorphism coefficients for measuring inter-firm differences, using multidimensional scale analysis. The result of our analysis shows that Taiwan's business groups though performing a series of diversification activities over the last twenty years tend to be increasingly evolving in an isomorphic manner.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Levinthal, D.(1988)。A survey of agency models of organizations。Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,9(2),153-185。
2.
Lubatkin, M. H.、Albert, A. A.Jr.、Lane, P. J.(1998)。Agency problems as antecedents to unrelated mergers and diversification: Amihud and Lev reconsidered。Strategic Management Journal,19(6),555-578。
3.
Peng, M. W.(1997)。Firm Growth in Transitional Economies: Three Longitudinal Cases From China, 1989-96。Organization Studies,18(3),385。
4.
Galaskiewicz, J.,、Wasserman, S.(1989)。Mimetic Progresses within an Interorganizational Field: An Empirical Test。Administrative Science Quarterly,34(3),pp. 454-479。
5.
Conner, Kathleen R.(1991)。A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm?。Journal of Management,17(1),121-154。
6.
Nelson, Richard R.、Winter, Sidney G.(1977)。In search of useful theory of innovation。Research Policy,6(1),36-76。
7.
Barley, S. R.(1986)。Technology As an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence form Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments。Administrative Science Quarterly,31,78-108。
8.
Suchman, Mark C.(1995)。Managing Legitimacy: Strategy and Institutional Approaches。Academy of Management Review,20(3),571-585。
9.
Nelson, Richard R.(1991)。Why Do Firms Differ, and How Does it Matter?。Strategic Management Journal,12(S2),61-74。
10.
Mizruchi, Mark S.、Fein, Lisa C.(1999)。The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism。Administrative Science Quarterly,44(4),653-683。
11.
Meyer, J. W.、Rowan, B.(1977)。Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony。American Journal of Sociology,83(2),340-363。
12.
Stuart, T. E.、Podolny, J. M.(1996)。Local Search and the Evolution of Technological Capabilities。Strategic Management Journal,17(S1),21-38。
13.
Deephouse, D. L.(1996)。Does Isomorphism Legitimate?。Academy of Management Journal,39(4),1024-1039。
14.
DiMaggio, Paul J.、Powell, Walter W.(1983)。The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields。American Sociological Review,48(2),147-160。
15.
David, Paul A.(1985)。Clio and the economics of QWERTY。The American Economic Review,75(2),332-339。
16.
Powell, Thomas C.、Dent-Micallef, Anne(1997)。Information Technology as Competitive Advantage: the Role of Human, Business, and Technology Resources。Strategic Management Journal,18(5),375-405。
17.
Hannan, Michael T.、Freeman, John H.(1977)。The Population Ecology of Organizations。American Journal of Sociology,82(5),929-964。
18.
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.(1989)。Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review。The Academy of Management Review,14(1),57-74。
19.
Baptista, Rui、Swann, Peter(1998)。Do firms in clusters innovate more?。Research Policy,27(5),525-540。
20.
Utterback, J. M.、Abernathy, William J.(1975)。A dynamic model of process and product innovation。Omega,3(6),639-656。
21.
Wernerfelt, Birger(1984)。A Resource-based View of the Firm。Strategic Management Journal,5(2),171-180。
22.
Hinings, B.、Slack, T.(1995)。Institutional pressures and isomorphic change: An empirical test。Organization Studies,17(5),803-827。
23.
Scarbrough, H.(1998)。Path(ological) dependency? Core competencies from an organizational perspective。British Journal of Management,9(3),219-232。
24.
Narayanan, K.(1998)。Technology acquisition, de-regulation and competitiveness: A study of Indian automobile industry。Research Policy,27(2),215-228。
25.
Majumdar, S. K.(1998)。On the utilization of resources: Perspectives from the U. S. telecommunications industry。Strategic Management Journal,19(9),809-831。
26.
Haubrich, J. G.(1998)。Bank diversification: Laws and fallacies of large numbers。Economic Review,34(2),2-9。
27.
Granstrand, O.(1998)。Towards a theory of the technology-based firm。Research Policy,27(5),465-489。
28.
Foray, D.(1997)。The dynamic implications of increasing returns: Technological change and path dependent inefficiency。International Journal of Industrial Organization,15,733-752。
29.
Delmestri, G.(1998)。Do all roads lead to Rome... or Berlin? The evolution of intra- and inter-organizational routines in the machine-building industry。Organization Studies,19(4),639-665。
30.
Nemec, C.、Worrell, D. L.、Davidson, W.(1998)。CEO duality, succession-planning and agency theory: Research agenda。Strategic Management Journal,19(9),905-908。
31.
Audretsch, D. B.(1997)。Technological regimes, industrial demography and the evolution of industrial structures。Industrial and Corporate Change,6(1),49-82。
圖書
1.
Davison, Mark L.(1983)。Multidimensional Scaling。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons。
2.
行政院主計總處(1991)。中華民國行業標準分類。臺北:行政院主計總處。
延伸查詢
3.
Whitley, Richard(1992)。Business systems in East Asia: firms, markets and societies。Sage。
4.
Utterback, J. M.(1994)。Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize O pportunities in the Face of Technological Change。Boston, MA。
5.
Lawrence, Paul R.、Lorsch, Jay W.(1967)。Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration。Boston:Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University。
6.
Collins, R.(1979)。The credential society: A historical sociology of education and stratification。New York:Academic Press。
7.
Cox, T. F.、Cox, M. A. A.(1994)。Multidimensional scaling。Chapman & Hall。
8.
Kruskal, J. B.、Wish, M.(1978)。Multidimensional scaling。Newbury Park, CA:Beverly Hills, California:London:Sage。
9.
Nelson, Richard R.、Winter, Sidney G.(1982)。An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change。Cambridge, Massachusetts:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。
10.
Larson, Magali Sarfatti(1977)。The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis。University of California Press。
11.
Woodward, Joan(1965)。Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice。Oxford University Press。
12.
March, James G.、Olsen, Johan P.(1976)。Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations。Bergen:Universitetsforlaget。
13.
Penrose, E. T.(1995)。The theory of the growth of the firm。New York:John Wiley。
14.
Nerlove, S. B.、Rommey, A. K.、Shepard, R. N.(1972)。Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences。Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences。N. Y.。
15.
Hamilton, G. G.、Biggart, N. W.、Orru, M.(1997)。Organization isomorphism in East Asia。The Economic Organization of East Asian Capitalism。London, UK。
16.
Dosi, G.(1984)。Technical Change and Industrial Transformation。Technical Change and Industrial Transformation。London, UK。
17.
中華徵信所(1979)。臺灣地區集團企業研究。臺灣地區集團企業研究。臺北市。
延伸查詢
圖書論文
1.
Hawley, A. H.(1968)。Human Ecology。International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences。New York:Macmillan。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
科技管理三重奏:策略視角的分析與評論
2.
以組織同形理論探討大眾媒體中的跨組織模仿現象
3.
檢視臺灣電視產業模仿同形現象--以綜藝談話性節目為例
4.
臺灣前五大汽車整車製造公司組織發展歷程之分析
5.
自由化與企業集團化的趨勢
1.
組織資源成長類型與成長方式關係之研究
1.
全球化下的臺灣經濟
無相關著作
1.
以組織同形理論探討大眾媒體中的跨組織模仿現象
2.
自由化與企業集團化的趨勢
QR Code