This article has taken "policy evaluation" as a tool to analyzethe problems with the implementation of the "Deregulatory Policyof Ownership Transfer of Farmland in Taiwan" ( i.e. DeregulatoryPolicy) . After the analysis, the following results can be pointedout:1. The ratio of "willing to farm" and "willing to sale farmland" of the interviewee (farmers) has decreased after the implementation of the "Deregulatory Policy" in comparison with no implementation. This trend showed especially in the"urbanized -typed" agricultural areas. The main reason for this phenomenon is "no profit offarming".2. With the implementation of the "Deregulatory Policy", there is no influence of the factor "classification of farmland" on the"farming type". However, most of the interviewee are willing to keep the ownership of the farmland, especially for the farmer whose farmland is around the urban fringe. In order to improve the farming efficiency for such farmland, it's necessary for the authority to make some available measures.3.With the implementation of the "Deregulatory Policy", there is no influence on the factor "type of farmers" . I contrast to "part-time farmers", most of them want to give up their farmlands. Most of the "full-time farmers" want to keep farming in "most important farmland areas". That means, it's unavoidable for the authority to invest only in the "most important farmland areas".4. Regarding the farming motivation, the most of influential factors are belong to Un-agricultural sector. In order to improve the efficiency of farmland utilization, this finding is very available for the decision-making of agricultural policy.