:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:曾國藩幕府成員出幕後所任最高官職之比較分析
書刊名:中山人文學報
作者:凌林煌
作者(外文):Ling, Lin-huang
出版日期:2000
卷期:10
頁次:頁145-174
主題關鍵詞:曾國藩幕府清地方行政非正式政治組織量化分析法比較分析法Tseng Kuo-fanMu-fu systemLocal administration of the Ch'ingUnofficial political organizationQuantitative analysisComparative analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:22
     本文運用量化分析法,探究比較各期入幕曾國藩幕府並相關組織成員(以下簡稱「曾幕」)之單一變項-出幕後所任最高官職,以究明此一變項有無因時顯著消長變化之軌跡,並進而闡釋其微義。又益以統計圖表,顯現繁複之數據,俾使讀者能一目瞭然。 本文之主要結論有三:其一,就各期入幕曾幕出幕後所任最高官職之人次及其所佔比率而言:以「地方文官類」之四五二人次居冠,並幾近七成;以「官職不詳者」之一三八人次,稍逾二成,兩者併計,殆近九成;其餘四大類-「京官類」、「武職類」、「駐外官員類」及「其他類」併計,僅略逾一成;其二,就各期入幕曾幕出幕後所任最高職之消長變化而論:各類消長變化全以「地方文官類」為主體,毋論全期,抑或各期,是類皆高居同期各類之冠,其「不詳類」并「京官類」,並與此類同呈互為消長態勢。各類消長變化之主因有二:一為曾氏所負任務之輕重、職位之高低、處境之進退并其心想之抒鬱,一為曾氏核心幕府之所在。前曾幕任署兼護督撫者遍中國,曾幕成員勢力龐大;其三,就各期入幕部分曾幕三變項之交叉分析而言:曾氏幕府匪特為人才匯集之淵藪,抑且為人才培訓之處所。 綜之,在勢君子允宜以移風易俗,陶冶人才,並培訓繼起之英為己任。
     Applying the methodology of quantitative analysis, the writer, in this paper, comparatively analyzes one fundamental variable, namely, the highest ranks after leaving of the mu-yu [幕友, staff members] of Tseng Kuo-fan's mu-fu [曾國藩幕府] as well as its related organizations [hereafter referred to as Tseng's mu-fu ], who entered by periods from 1853 through 1872. The major findings of this study are as following. Firstly, the category of local officials, that amounted to 452 persons, and constituted almost 70 percents, were the most of the highest ranks after leaving of Tseng's mu-yu. Then, the category of the unspecified ranks amounted to 138 persons, and constituted merely more than 20 percents. The other four categories—central officials, military officials, diplomats in foregin service, and the other—constituted together only more than ten percents. Secondly, the tendency of vicissitude of every category of their highest ranks after leaving all depended upon the category of local officials. It was always the most among all categories at the same time, no matter all periods, or each stage. There were two cardinal causes of the vicissitude of every category. One was the heaviness and lightness of the mission with that Tseng was burdened, and the highness and lowliness of his post, situation and attitude. The other was the location of Tseng's core mu-fu. The former Tseng's mu-yu that were appointed governors or viceroys almost spread over then whole China with their huge inflential power. Thirdly, Tseng's mu-fu was not only the place where the talent met together, but the place where the perspective talent were cultivated and trained. In short, the gentlemen that were in power should urged themselves the necessity of transferring the folk-custom, cultivating the talent, and training the successors.
期刊論文
1.凌林煌(19960400)。曾國藩幕府成員之界定及其相關組織之發展。大陸雜誌,92(4),21-32。  延伸查詢new window
2.凌林煌(19951200)。曾國藩幕府成員之量化分析。思與言,33(4),55-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.趙爾巽、清史稿校註編纂小組、國史館(1990)。清史稿校註。臺北:國史館。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾國藩、蕭守英(1994)。曾國藩全集‧日記。長沙:嶽麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
3.翁同龢、李慈銘、王闓運、葉昌熾、金梁(1985)。近世人物志。明文書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.曾文正公(1985)。奏稿,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)吳汝綸(1967)。桐城吳先生(汝綸)文集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.嚴辰(1985)。墨花吟館感舊懷人集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top