:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:都市公園分佈型態與居民遊憩品質關係之研究
書刊名:戶外遊憩研究
作者:林寶秀林晏州
作者(外文):Lin, Bau-showLin, Yann-jou
出版日期:2001
卷期:14:2
頁次:頁41-61
主題關鍵詞:綠地率吉尼係數密度近鄰分析多樣性指標遊憩品質Open space rationGini coefficientDensityNearest-neighbor analysisDiversity indexRecreational satisfy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:87
     本研究之目的在探討都市公園分佈型態、居民選擇使用行為與居民遊憩品質滿意程度間的關係。以國中學區作為研究分區,並計算各學區都市公園分佈型態指標值,包括:(1) 綠地率指標,反應都市公園建設量是否足夠,數值愈大代表建設量愈高;(2) 吉尼係數指標 C,測量都市公園面積分配是否平均,數值愈大代表分配愈不平均;(3) 密度指標,實際計量都市公園之個數與學區面積的相對關係,數值愈大表示分配量愈多;(4) 近鄰分析指標,計量都市公園分佈是否均勻,若分佈是隨機的則R=1.0,若出現聚生型或較有規律的分佈,則R值分別小於或大於1.0;(5)多樣性H指標,衡量都市公園種類的豐富度與個體數的分配,H值愈高表示愈具多樣性;(6)多樣性H'指標,衡量都市公園種類的豐富度與面積的分配,H' 值愈高表示愈具多樣性。配合各學區居民問卷調查,將資料利用卡方檢定、相關分析及迴歸分析等統計方法,檢測其間的關係。研究結果如下:1.居民是否會去使用學區內的都市公園會受到綠地率、吉尼係數、密度、近鄰分析、多樣性 H、H'指標所影響。2.居民對學區內都市公園之整體遊憩品質滿意程度,與吉尼係數、多樣性 H 標指具有正相關性。3.社經特性、都市公園分佈型態與居民遊憩品質之關係間具有相關性。
     The purpose of this study were to investigate the relationships among urban park distribution pattern, residents' choice behaviors, and the quality of residents' outdoor recreation. Junior high school areas were used as study units. Many indices describing urban park distribution pattern were measured for each area. These indices includer:(1) Open space ration index that responses construct quantity of urban parks is increased as the raising of urban park construct quantity. (2)Gini coefficient index, C, was used to describe irban parks' area distribution. C value is increased as the urban parks' area distribution is more even. (3)Density index that was used to describe the relationship between the number of urban parks to the area of junior high school is increased as the raising of urban park quantity. (4)Nearest-neighbor analysis that was used to describe urban park distributions. The nearest-neighbor statistic, R, equals 1.0 if the distribution of urban is random. An aggregated pattern or a pattern more regular than random, produces a value less than or grater than 1.0, respectively. (5)Diversity index, H, was used to describe the sort richness and its number of urban parks. H value is increased as the raising of urban park diversity. (6) Diversity index, H', was used to describe the sort richness and its area of urban parks. H' value is increased as the raising of urban park diversity. The questionnaires were then collected from each junior high school area. Statistic methods such as chi-square test, correlation and regression analysis were used to examine the relationships among them. The results are summarized as followed:1.Residents' choice behaviors did affect by open space ration, gini coefficient, density, nearest-neighobr analysis, diversity index, H and H'. 2.A significant positive correlations were found between residents' outdoor recreation satisfy, gini coefficient, and diversity index, H. 3.Residents' personal characteristics are related to the relationships that among urban park distribution pattern and residents' recreational satisfy.
期刊論文
1.Griffith, J. A.、Martinko, E. A.、Price, K. P.(2000)。Landscape structure analysis of Kansas at three scales。Landscape and Urban Planning,52,45-61。  new window
2.Burgess, Jacquelin、Harrison, Carolyn M.、Limb, Melanie(1988)。People, parks and the urban green: a study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city。Urban Studies,25,455-473。  new window
3.Whitehead, J. C.、Haab, T. C.、Huang, J. C.(2000)。Measuring Recreation Benefits of Quality Improvements with Revealed and Stated Behavior Data。Resource and Energy Economics,22(4),339-354。  new window
4.林晏州(1984)。區域性戶外遊憩資源規劃方法之研究--旅論臺灣地區遊憩資源開發策略。都市與計劃,11,1-18。  延伸查詢new window
5.Tyrvainen, L.、Vaananen, H.(1998)。The economic value of urban forest amenities: an application of the contingent valuation method。Landscape and Urban Planning,43,105-118。  new window
6.More, T.、Stevens, T.、Allen, P. G.(1988)。Valuation of Urban Parks。Landscape and Urban Planning,15(1/2),139-152。  new window
7.陳肇琦(19911200)。都市公園系統規劃設計準則之探討。營建季刊,2(3),33-40。  延伸查詢new window
8.Smith, Tara、Maurice, Nelischer、Nathan, Perkins(1997)。Quality of an Urban Community: A Framework for Understanding the Relationship between Quality and Physical Form。Landscape and Urban Planning,39(2-3),229-241。  new window
9.陳昭蓉、林晏州(19960900)。鄰里公園使用者滿意度影響因素之探討。戶外遊憩研究,9(2/3),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Seabrooke, A. K.(1987)。A Descriptive Model for Planning Urban Park。Recreation Research Review,13(3),39-46。  new window
11.Dorfman, Peter W.(1979)。Measurement and Meaning of Recreation Satisfaction: A Case Study in Camping。Environment and Behavior,11(4),483-510。  new window
12.Manning, Robert E.(1985)。Diversity in a Democracy: Expanding the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum。Leisure Sciences,7(4),377-399。  new window
13.Solecki, W. D.、Walls, J. M.(1995)。Urban parks: green spaces or green walls?。Landscape and Urban Planning,32,93-106。  new window
14.Stewart, William P.、Hull, R. B.(1992)。Satisfaction of what? Post hoc versus real-time construct validity。Leisure Sciences,14(3),195-209。  new window
15.曾國雄、曹勝雄、廖耀東(1992)。臺北都會區土地使用形態與環境品質之研究。都市與計劃,19(1),35-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Cranz, G.(1978)。Changing roles of urban parks - from pleasure ground to open space。Landscape,22(3),9-18。  new window
17.Cybriwsky, R.(1999)。Changing patterns of urban public space: observations and assessments from the Tokyo and New York metropolitan areas。Cities,16(4),223-231。  new window
18.Erkip, F. B.(1997)。The distribution of urban public services: the case of parks and recreational services in Ankara。Cities,14(6),353-361。  new window
19.Hamilton, J. A.、Crompton, J. L.、More, T. A.(1991)。Identify the dimension of service quality in a park context。Journal of Environmental Management,32(3),211-220。  new window
20.Jones, Bryan D.、Kaufman, C. M.(1974)。The distribution of urban public services。Administration & Society,6,337-360。  new window
21.Maeda, H.、Murakami, S.(1985)。Population's urban environment evaluation model and its application。Journal of Regional Science,25(2),273-291。  new window
22.Rolfe, E.(1965)。Geography analysis of the distribution of neighborhood parks in Lansing: 1920-60。Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters,50,479-491。  new window
研究報告
1.內政部(1996)。全國公園綠地研討會總結報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.望熙娟(1992)。戶外遊憩區淡旺季問題及其改善策略之研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學,台中。  延伸查詢new window
2.張啟良(1988)。遊憩品質之研究--以森林遊樂區為例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳惠美(1995)。鄰里公園使用後評估模式之建立(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.胡淑雲(1988)。臺北市居民利用公園的行為地理研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊崇賢(1977)。臺北市寶清里鄰里公園與其居民休憩關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃淑姿(198207)。都市里鄰公園區位之研究:以台北市大安區為例(碩士論文)。國立中興大學,台中。  延伸查詢new window
7.何東坡(1979)。臺北市公共設施與財政關係之研究,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.苗蕙芬(1994)。公共圖書館設置區位之研究,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Smith, Stephen L. J.、吳必虎、顏建平、戴光全、談三平(1996)。遊憩地理學--理論與方法。台北:田園城市出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部營建署(1997)。高雄都會公園遊憩型態及使用者模式之研究。台北市:內政部營建署。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉棠瑞、蘇鴻傑(1989)。森林植物生態學。台灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.臺北市政府工務局公園路燈工程管理處(2001)。臺北市公園綠地配置圖。臺北市公園綠地配置圖。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.徐育珠(1978)。經濟學。經濟學。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.國立交通大學交通運輸研究所(1998)。都市規劃作業手冊(一)-基本資料蒐集與調查分析作業手冊及規劃指標系統之建立。都市規劃作業手冊(一)-基本資料蒐集與調查分析作業手冊及規劃指標系統之建立。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉永憲(1987)。財政學公共部門經濟學。財政學公共部門經濟學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.Gaster, L.(1995)。Quality in public services managers' choice。Quality in public services managers' choice。Bristol。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE