臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：權力決策模式與績效之相關性研究--公民營企業之實證
書刊名：中華管理學報
作者：吳志正 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wu, Jyh-jeng
出版日期：2001
卷期：2:2
頁次：頁19-41
主題關鍵詞：權力決策模式；公營事業；民營事業；績效；Power decision models；Public-owned organizations；Private organizations；Performance
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:16
　　　　　權力在決策制定的過程中扮演著影響決策選擇的重要角色，企業在決策時，極有可能較偏向於某一模式，並且對決策之績效產生影響。綜觀臺灣公、民營企業中的決策運作模式，大致可分為三種：決策政治化、決策制度化及決策理性化。就家族企業而言，傾向於決策政治化者最多，而傾向於決策制度化者則居次。而外資企業由於權責劃分較清楚，因此，其決策模式較傾向於理性化，公營企業雖然以決策理性化佔大多數，但是在決策政治化及決策制度化上，卻比其它企業所佔比例更多。再者，若由績效的觀點來看，績優組在決策模式中較傾向於理性模式，而績差組較傾向於非理性模式。
　　　　　Power is a very important factor in decision making process, Organizations which apply different types of decision model reveal different performance. By taking the Taiwanese public-owned as well as private enterprises as samples. There are three kinds of decision models in public-owned and private organizations: Political Decision Model, Bureaucratic Decision Model, and Rational Decision Model. Our findings show that: the family-owned businesses are more political decision oriented; the foreign businesses are rational decision oriented, Although the public-owned organizations are rational decision oriented, they are more political decision and bureaucratic decision oriented than the others. To sum up, Higher-performance organizations tend to use rational decision model. On the other hand, the low-performance organizations tend to adopt non-rational decision models.
期刊論文
1.曾仕強(19890400)。中國式管理要領。管理雜誌，178，115-117。  延伸查詢new window
2.Frankwick, G. L.、Ward, J. C.、Hutt, M. D.、Reingen, P. H.(1994)。Evolving Patterns of Organizational Beliefs In the Formation of Strategy。Journal of Marketing，58(2)，96-110。  new window
3.Konrad, A.、Linnehan, F.(1995)。Formalized HRM Structure: Coordination Equal Employment Opportunity or Counseling Organizational Practices?。Academy of Management Journal，38，787-820。  new window
4.Molm, L. D.(1990)。Structure, Action, and Outcome: The Dynamics of Power in Social Exchange。American Sociological Review，55(3)，427-447。  new window
5.Quinn, R. E.、Rohrbaugh, J.(1983)。A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Toward a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis。Management Science，29(3)，363-377。  new window
6.張淑昭、吳志正、林敬儒(20000900)。權力情境及權力結構對決策影響之研究--臺灣上市公司的實證研究。管理學報，17(3)，389-413。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.劉宗其、吳志正、張淑昭(19970300)。權力、企業型態與主管之決策影響力對企業績效之影響。輔仁管理評論，4(1)，111-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Brass, Daniel J.、Burkhardt, M. E.(1993)。Potential Power and Power Use: An Investigation of Structure and Behavior。Academy of Management Journal，36(3)，441-470。  new window
9.Kipnis, D.、Schmidt, S. M.(1988)。Upward-influence Styles: Relationship with Performance Evaluation, Salary, and Stress。Administrative Science Quarterly，33(4)，528-542。  new window
10.Narayanan, V. K.、Fathy, Liam(1982)。The micro-politics of strategy formulation。Academy of Management Review，7(1)，25-34。  new window
11.Nutt, Paul C.(1984)。Types of Organizational Decision Processes。Administrative Science Quarterly，29(3)，414-450。  new window
12.Ruekert, R. W.、Walker, O. C. Jr.(1987)。Marketing Interaction with Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence。Journal of Marketing，51，1-19。  new window
13.Papadakis, V. M.、Lioukas, S.、Chambers, D.(1998)。Strategic decision-making processes: the role of management and context。Strategic Management Journal，19(2)，115-147。  new window
14.Simonin, B. L.(1999)。Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances。Strategic Management Journal，20(7)，595-623。  new window
15.Mintzberg, Henry、Raisinghani, Duru、Theoret, Andre(1976)。The structure of unstructured decision processes。Administrative Science Quarterly，21(2)，246-275。  new window
會議論文
1.黃光國(1983)。人情與面子：中國人的權力遊戲。中國文化與現代化研討會。香港：香港中文大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張逸民(1994)。中國式管理的理論議題。第一屆中國文化與企業管理學術會議，成功大學企管系及中文系主辦 。台南。  延伸查詢new window
3.許士軍(1984)。從比較觀點探討中國式管理理論之發展。臺北：時報文化出版公司。75-100。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃光國(1984)。儒家倫理與企業組織形態。臺北：時報文化。21-49。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.胡哲生(1987)。問題結構及權力結構情境下之決策型態--權變觀點(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡敦浩(1985)。策略性決策過程之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Friedland, E. I.(1974)。Introduction to the Concept of Rationality in Political Science。General Learning。  new window
2.Allison, Graham T.(1971)。Essence of Decision。Boston, MA：Little, Brown & Company。  new window
3.Baldridge, J. V.(1971)。Power and Conflict in the University。John Wiley。  new window
4.Sharma, Subhash(1996)。Applied Multivariate Techniques。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
5.Weber, Max、Parsons, T.(1947)。The Theory of Social and Economic Organization。Free Press。  new window
6.Homans, George C.(1974)。Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms。New York：Harcourt Brace Jovanovich。  new window
7.Robbins, Stephen P.(1990)。Organization Theory: Structure, Design, and Application。Prentice-Hall。  new window
8.Pfeffer, J.(1992)。Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations。Harvard Business School Press。  new window
9.March, James G.、Olsen, Johan P.(1976)。Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations。Bergen：Universitetsforlaget。  new window
10.Pfeffer, Jeffrey(1981)。Power in organizations。Pitman Publishing Company。  new window
11.Blau, Peter Michael(1964)。Exchange and Power in Social Life。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.March, James G.(1966)。The Power of Power。Varieties of political theory。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
2.Raven, B. H.、Kruglanski, A. W.(1975)。Conflict and power。The Structure of Conflict。NY：Academic Press。  new window
3.French, J. R. P. Jr.、Raven, B. H.(1959)。The bases of social power。Studies in social power。University of Michigan Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1263（臺灣：1248，外國：15） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2541260 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68333932
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上