:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Metadata在數位博物館之發展與分析
書刊名:圖書館學與資訊科學
作者:陳亞寧 引用關係陳淑君 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Ya-ningChen, Shu-jiun
出版日期:2001
卷期:27:2
頁次:頁52-66
主題關鍵詞:後設資料博物館資訊數位典藏藝術品描述類目後設資料生命週期內涵分析MetadataData standardMuseum informationDigital archivingCDWAMetadata lifecycleContent analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:28
     本文旨在針對數位博物館Metadata進行探討,共採取了文獻探討、比較分析與個案研究三種研究方法,分別就數位博物館計畫Metadata相關名詞暨標準的發展與應用現況進行研議、標準對照與分析,以及國家典藏數位計晝的個案研究。本研究發現:(l) 數位博物館計童Metadata發展的理念與重心各有不同,但實際應用上存有互補性;(2) 會有相對應的相關Metadata格式、詞彙典、資訊模式為輔,讓Metadata的應用更臻於完善;(3) Metadata提供的資源描述類目在詳簡程度與深度結構上具有相當大的差異,實際應用時可視需求而有所選擇。此外,以國家典藏數位計劃為個案研究,也提出四項研究發現:(1) 數位典藏品metadata面臨的環境與挑戰;(2) 建立metadata生命週期作業模式;(3) 發展metadata內涵分析的方法論;(4) 建構metadata互通層次架構。最後,本文針對metadata的採用標準、特質、面向、層次、品質保證與不同metadata間關係等六大議題提出建議。
     This paper aims to take a serious study on related Metadata standards and issues of the digital museum projects by deploying three research methodologies: literature review, comparative study, and case study. This paper is composed by four parts as follows: related terminologies and coverage, typology of current Metadata development, research finding based on a comparison of four standards, and a case study of the Digital Archives Project in Taiwan. This paper raises three findings: (1) A variety of Metadata standards are developed for different purposes, and complementary to each other; (2) In order to achieve functionality optimization of Metadata, related standards are designed as dependent mechanisms, like union list, thesaurus, data model; (3) In terms of comprehensiveness and structure, disparity exists amongst a wide of Metadata standards. In practice this substantial customized phenomenon is reasonable for implementation of each digital museum project. This paper also presents four findings for a case study as follows: (1) challenging issues of Metadata implementation in digital museum project: (2) constructing a Metadata lifecycle model, (3) developing content analysis methodology; (4) building up the Metadata interoperability levels. Finally, this paper addresses four issues and suggestions as conclusion: adoption of Metadata standards, characteristics, facets, levels, quality assurance, and relationships of Metadata.
圖書
1.國立故宮博物院編輯委員會(2000)。故宮文物菁華百品展(第二冊)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.國家典藏數位化專案計畫計畫辦公室(2001)。數位典藏國家型科技計畫總體規畫書。數位典藏國家型科技計畫總體規畫書。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中央研究院Metadata工作小組(2001)。各主題Metadata參考規範,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Baker, T.(1997)。Dublin Core in multiple languages: Esperanto, interingua, or pidgin?。  new window
3.Categories for the description of works of art。  new window
4.Getty Standards program crosswalk of metadata standards。  new window
5.DCMI status report - October 2001。  new window
6.An Overview of the Dublin Core metadata initiative。  new window
7.wordHOARD。  new window
8.Standards for museum information: Interesting and helpful Websites。  new window
9.Using web metadata, part 1: the Dublin Core in WWW7 tutorial track。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top