:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小運用STS教學模式--天象與時空概念教學模組之探討
書刊名:科學教育學刊
作者:許民陽 引用關係王郁軒梁添水鄭紹龍
作者(外文):Hsu, Ming-yangWang, Yu-hsuanLiang, Tien-sueJeng, Shao-long
出版日期:2001
卷期:9:1
頁次:頁79-100
主題關鍵詞:天象時空概念科學過程技能教學模組STSConcepts of astronomical phenomena and of space-timeScience process skillsTeaching module
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:27
     國小自然自科中有關天象觀與時空概念探討的部分是教師教學最感困難的部分。本研究採用準實驗研究法,以天象與時空概念的生活議題做為研究主題,分別取取國小自然科四年級下學期的「磁場與磁極」單元,五年級上學期「看星星」單元,五年級上學期「看星星」單元,五年級下學期「太陽和季節」單元,進行STS定模組的設計與成效評估,並探討相關議題融入這些天象與時空概念教學的可行性。實驗組採用自編的STS教學模組進行教學活動,控制組則依行教科指引的教學方式進行教學。實驗組所實施的STS教學模且主要以報章上有關登山客發生迷途意外,大眾全力搶救的社會議題為核心,由此引起兒童的關注與學習動機。教師引導兒童進入方位辨認的活動主題,主動收集資料討論,結合社教機構教學資源進行學習,達成應用天象時空的概念與天象觀技巧來解決問題。整個教學實驗實施程序分為前測、教學實驗、後測。前、後測學習成效的評量工具為自編的單元學習成就測驗。前、後測完成後,先個別計算實驗組與控制組答題表現的平均數與標準差,再以兩組學生前測的成績當作共變數,進行共變數分析後顯示實驗組與控制組學生之間的學習表現具有顯著的差異,且實驗組的學生在參與STS教學活動之後對於科學概念及科學過程技能的學習成效均明顯於控制組學生的表現。
     The purpose of this study was to use quasi-experiment design to explore the real life issues about the concepts of astronomical phenomena and space-time, both of the two topics were introduced as the topic of learning separately from related curriculum of natural science of 4th-grade and 5th-grade in primary school. Three elementary schools of Taipei city and Taipei county were selected as study samples, that all samples were divided into two groups: The experimental group and the control group. The experimental group used the STS teaching models that developed by the research. The control group used the teaching strategies from the current textbook. The results revealed that experimental group students' performance were significantly better not only in science concept but also science process skills than the control group students. This results could provide as a reference for science teachers who engage in elementary science teaching, and for the compiling of textbook.
期刊論文
1.Merryfield, M.(1991)。Preparing American secondary social studies teacher to teach with a global perspective: A status report。Journal of Teachers Education,42,11-20。  new window
2.許民陽、鄧國雄、卓娟秀、李崑山、殷炯盛(19940600)。國小學童對方向及位置兩空間概念認知發展的研究。臺北市立師範學院學報,25,91-120。  延伸查詢new window
3.Heath, P. A.(1992)。Organizing for STS teaching and learning: the doing of STS。Theory into Practice,31(1),52-58。  new window
4.盧玉玲、連啟瑞(19970600)。STS教學模組開發模式之建立及其實際教學成效評估。科學教育學刊,5(2),219-243。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王美芬(19920600)。我國五、六年級學生有關月亮錯誤概念的診斷及補救教學策略的應用。臺北市立師範學院學報,23,357-380。  延伸查詢new window
6.Osborne, R. J.、Wittrock, M. C.(1983)。Learning science: A generative process。Science Education,67(4),489-508。  new window
會議論文
1.王澄霞、林梅芬(1994)。開發溫室效應STS單元。中華民國第十屆科學教育學術研討會。國科會。37-68。  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇育任、陳素琴(1998)。將STS理念融入國小自然科課程的嘗試。八十七學年度教育學術研討會,台北市立師範學院主辦 (會議日期: 1998年11月26日-27日),1-30。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Harms, N. C.(1977)。Project Synthesis: An Interpretative Consolidation of Research Identifying Needs in Natural Science Education。Boulder, CO:University of Colorado。  new window
2.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
其他
1.王澄霞(1994)。設計大學STS 化學通識教育的架構。  延伸查詢new window
2.王澄霞和劉奕昇(1994)。臭氧層破洞STS單元活動:師資培育。  延伸查詢new window
3.毛松霖(1994)。地球科學學習進展測驗(乙)--國小版。  延伸查詢new window
4.毛松霖和陳文典(1996)。解決問題教學法。  延伸查詢new window
5.毛連塭(1986)。台北市國民小學自然科教學現況及改進之途徑。  延伸查詢new window
6.林昭賢(1992)。台北市國小五年級(上冊)自然科學教學評量參考資料。  延伸查詢new window
7.江新合和陳榮祥(1998)。開發國小自然科STS 教材之實驗研究。  延伸查詢new window
8.施惠(1994)。國小教師在職研習探究活動之研究--月球運動的探討過程。  延伸查詢new window
9.姜滿(1996)。國小學童對地球形狀及地心引力之另有概念研究(II)。  延伸查詢new window
10.洪志明和郭家宏(1998)。STS 學習模組之研究開發--糖。  延伸查詢new window
11.洪志明和許仁杰(1998)。STS 遠距教學系統設計與實作。  延伸查詢new window
12.洪志明和徐慧萍(1999)。STS 學習模組之研究開發--除濕劑。  延伸查詢new window
13.莊奇勳和王嘉田(1996)。國民小學高年級豆漿製作STS 教學模組的探討。  延伸查詢new window
14.莊奇勳(1998)。應用網際網路開發環境科學STS 教學模組之研究。  延伸查詢new window
15.許民陽、王郁軒(1999)。國小運用STS 教學模式--天象與時空概念教學模組之探討。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃鴻博(1999)。在國民小學實施STS 教育合作行動研究之成果與限制。  延伸查詢new window
17.蘇育任(1996)。開發STS 核化學模組與其合作學習法之研究。  延伸查詢new window
18.蘇育任(1999)。模糊理論在STS 教學能力評量上之應用研究。  延伸查詢new window
19.Ajeyalemi,D. A.(1993)。Teacher strategies used by exemplary STS teachers。  new window
20.Butterfield, E. C., & Nelson, G. D.(1983)。Theory and practice of teaching for transfer。  new window
21.Hofstein, A., & Yager, R. E.(1982)。Societial issues as organizers for science education in the 80's。  new window
22.McComack, W. F., & Yager, R. E.(1989)。The Iowa assessment package for evaluation in five domains of science education. Iowa City。  new window
23.Saunders, W. L.(1991)。The constructivist perspective: Implication and teaching strategies for science。  new window
圖書論文
1.Duit, R.(1991)。Students' conceptual frameworks: Consequences for learning science。The psychology of learning science。Hillsdale:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
2.Yager, R. E.(1992)。The constructivist learning model: A must for STS classrooms。ICASE yearbook: The status of science-technology-society reform efforts around the world。Hong Kong:International Council of Associations for Science Education。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top