:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:九年一貫課程數學領域第三、四學習階段分段能力指標序階之適切性初探研究
書刊名:測驗年刊
作者:鄭蕙如林世華
作者(外文):Cheng, Huey-ruLin, Sieh-hwa
出版日期:2002
卷期:49:1
頁次:頁51-74
主題關鍵詞:九年一貫課程數學能力項目反應理論垂直等化Nine-year integrated curriculaMathematical abilityItem response theoryVertical equating
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:59
     本研究主要目的在了解九年一貫課程數學領域分段能力指標序階之適切性,在研究方法上,針對九年一貫課程數學領域(三、四階段)之能力指標進行分析,了解國內學者訂定課程目標的主要概念,以項目反應理論垂直等化模式,進行試題分析,採校準試題設計,六、七、八、九共四個年級,每年級兩份試卷,共八份試卷,189題試題施測,有效試題165題,利用BILOG-MG程式估計試題之難度參數,並將不同測驗的項目參數以同一量尺表示,獲得各數學試題及能力指標在量尺上相對應的位置。在研究結果部份,由各試題及能力指標所對應的量尺位置,得到第三階段七年級分段能力指標的學習內容,對於七年級學生學習而言偏難,第三階段六年級及第四階段分段能力指標之學習內容,則符合學習是由易至難的基本假設。最後研究者針對研究所得之結論,提出未來研究的建議與應用。
     The purpose of the research is to understand the fitness of the ability indicator sequences for Nine-Year Integrated Curricula. The ability indicators of Nine-Year Integrated Mathematical Curricula was analyzed so that the ideas of curriculum objects formulated in Taiwan could be examined. Moreover, the testing items were designed by vertical equating of Item Response Theory. The tests were developed by anchor-test design for equating form. Two test forms were given to the students for each grade from sixth to ninth grade, and eight tests contained 165 items are developed and calibrated through IRT analysis, using BILOG-MG program to estimate the IRT item parameters and the ability parameters. The parameters of the different tests are scaled by equating process to obtain the corresponding positions of the ability indicators on the scale. The research reveals that mathematical indicators in the third and forth stages are difficult for seventh graders, but are suitable for sixth, eighth, ninth graders. At last, based on the result, discussions for how to use the evaluation in practice and further research are proposed as well.
期刊論文
1.余民寧(199112)。試題反應理論的介紹(1)--測驗理論的發展趨勢。研習資訊,8(6),13-18。  延伸查詢new window
2.Reckase, M. D.(1979)。Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications。Journal of Educational Statistics,4(3),207-230。  new window
3.李源煌、楊玉女(20000100)。建立學科評量量尺之理論基礎。測驗年刊,47(1),95-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.朱敬先(19880100)。由皮亞傑認知發展理論, 談教育改革方向。臺灣教育,445,23-25。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Mislevy, R. J.、Bock, R. D.(1982)。Implementation of the EM algorithm in the estimation of item parameters: The BILOG computer program。Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference,(會議日期: July 27-30, 1982)。Wayzata, MN。  new window
2.陳昭地(2001)。臺灣參加TIMSS-R幾何主題測驗分析探討九年一貫數學領域圖形與空間能力指標。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Zimowski, M. F.、Muraki, E.、Mislevy, R. J.、Bock, R. D.(1996)。BILOG-MG: Multiple-group IRT analysis and test maintenance for binary items。Chicago, IL:Chicago Scientific Software International Inc.。  new window
2.Lord, Frederic M.、Novick, Melvin R.、Birnbaum, Allan(1968)。Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
3.Bloom, B. S.、Hastings, J. T.、Madaus, G. F.(1971)。Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.Krutetskii, V. A.、Kilpatrick, J.、Wirzup, I.、Teller, John(1976)。The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in School Children。Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.Crocker, L.、Algina, J.(1986)。Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory。Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
6.Lord, Frederic M.(1980)。Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
7.Hambleton, R. K.、Swaminathan, H.(1985)。Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications。Boston, Massachusetts:Kluwer-Nijhoff。  new window
8.Kolen, M. J.、Brennan, R. J.(1995)。Test Equating: Methods and Practices。New York:Springer-Verlag。  new window
9.臺北市政府教育局(1998)。國民中學學科基本能力測驗說明書(教師版)。國民中學學科基本能力測驗說明書(教師版)。臺北:教育局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top