:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:A Study on Teachers' Perception of Strategy Use: Reading Strategy Instruction and Students' Motivation to Read
書刊名:國立虎尾技術學院學報
作者:柯美雲 引用關係
作者(外文):Ko, Mei-yun
出版日期:2002
卷期:5
頁次:頁202-212
主題關鍵詞:閱讀策略動機後設認知基模Reading strategiesMotivationMetacognitionSchemata
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:26
     在臺灣,非主修英語的學生對英語閱讀的態度是既被動又缺乏動機。最近第二外語之研究顯示,教授學生特定的閱讀策略可以增進學生閱讀理解能力,進而提昇學習動機。教師藉由喚醒學生對於閱讀過程與閱讀策略的後設認知,可達到增進閱讀能力之效果。有鑑於此,本研究以訪談的方式探討英文教師如何教授非主修英語的學生英文閱讀課程。本研究探討之問題有三:教師教授閱讀之方法為何?教師如何將閱讀策略融入教學?以及閱讀策略教學與學生閱讀動機之關係。研究結果顯示:教師能以英語作為互動工具,使學生更積極參與課堂活動。閱讀前活動,例如啟動學生基模,為閱讀過程中最重要的部份;其他活動如下組討論、小組報告、角色扮演,亦有助於閱讀動機之提昇。然而經由本研究發現,受訪教師皆不認為在閱讀課中有必要刻意教授閱讀策略,或讓學生了解後設認知活動。此一現象有待進一步探討。
     Many non-English majors in Taiwan have a passive attitude toward reading and lack motivation. Recent L2 research has suggested that teaching students specific reading strategies improves their reading comprehension and therefore increases their motivation for reading. Teachers could raise students' metacoginitve awareness of their reading processes or reading strategies to enhance proficiency. However, teachers' perception of strategy use affects how they engage in strategy teaching. Therefore I interviewed three Chinese teachers who taught reading to non-English majors in Taiwan. I looked into how they approach the reading class, how they incorporate reading strategies into their teaching and how they view reading strategy instruction and its relation to student motivation. Results showed that teachers can help students become active and engaged readers by using English as a means of interaction. Pre-reading activities such as activating students' schemata is considered as an essential part of reading teaching and as great motivators to reading. Besides, activities such as small group discussion, group presentation and role play can motivate students in the reading class. However, the results also showed that the teachers investigated consider it unnecessary to explicitly teach students reading strategies or engage students in that act of metacognition in their reading classes. This phenomenon invites further investigation.
期刊論文
1.Pressley, M.、Woloshyn, V.、Lysynchuk, L. M.、Martin, V.、Wood, E.、Willoughby, T.(1990)。A primer of research on cognitive strategy instruction: The important issues and how to address them。Educational Psychology Review,2(1),1-58。  new window
2.Bamford, Julian、Day, Richard R.(1998)。Teaching reading。Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,18,124-141。  new window
3.Anderson, N. J.(1991)。Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing。The Modern Language Journal,75(4),460-472。  new window
4.Block, E.(1986)。The comprehension strategies of second language readers。TESOL Quarterly,20(3),463-494。  new window
5.Anderson, N. J.(1994)。Developing active readers: a pedagogical framework for the second language reading class。System,22,177-194。  new window
6.Dole, J. A.、Brown, K. J.、Trathen, W.(1996)。The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension performance of at-risk students。Reading Research Quarterly,31,62-88。  new window
7.Hood, P.(1996)。Early foreign language reading competence: some issues and evidence。Language Learning Journal,13,16-18。  new window
8.Hudson, T.(1998)。Theoretical perspectives on reading。Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,18,43-60。  new window
9.Schunk, D. H.(1985)。Self-Efficacy and Classroom Learning。Psychology in the Schools,22(2),208-223。  new window
10.Flavell, John H.(1979)。Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry。American Psychologist,34(10),906-911。  new window
11.O'Malley, Joseph Michael、Chamot, Anna Uhl、Stewner-Manzanares, Gloria、Russo, Rocco P.、Küpper, Lisa(1985)。Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language。TESOL Quarterly,19(3),557-584。  new window
12.Dörnyei, Zoltán(1994)。Motivation and Motivating in the foreign language classroom。The Modern Language Journal,78(3),273-284。  new window
圖書
1.Irwin, J. W.(1991)。Teaching reading comprehension processes。Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
2.Brown, H. Douglas(2001)。Teaching by Principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy。New York:Longman。  new window
3.Omaggio-Hadley, A.(2001)。Teaching language in context。Boston, MA:Heinle & Heinle Publishers。  new window
4.Nuttall, C.(1996)。Teaching reading skills in a foreign language。Oxford:Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Limited。  new window
5.Nunan, David(1999)。Second language teaching & learning。Heinle & Heinle Publishers。  new window
6.Smith, F.(1971)。Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read。NY:Holt, Rinehart, and Winston。  new window
7.Oxford, Rebecca L.(1990)。Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know。Newbury House。  new window
8.Garner, R. M.(1987)。Metacognition and Reading Comprehension。Norwood, NJ:Ablex Publishing Corporation。  new window
9.Gardner, R.、Lambert, W.(1972)。Attitudes and motivation in second language learning。Rowley, MA:Newbury House。  new window
圖書論文
1.Goodman, K. S.(1970)。Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game。Theoretical models and processes of reading。Newark, DE:International Reading Association。  new window
2.Winograd, P.、Hare, V. C.(1988)。Direct instruction of reading comprehension strategies: The nature of teacher explanation。Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment instruction and evaluation。Academic Press。  new window
3.Flavell, J. H.(1976)。Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving。The Nature of Intelligence。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE