:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:環境與國土保安政策之法制分析--以非都市土地河川區之劃定為例
書刊名:臺北大學法學論叢
作者:陳明燦 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Ming-tsann
出版日期:2002
卷期:50
頁次:頁67-100
主題關鍵詞:河川區劃定政策財產權保障法制分析制度分析與發展架構理論Establishment policy for the river zoneProperty rights protectionLegal institution approachIAD
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:23
近幾年來政府每每在「大自然反撲」威脅下,特別重視環境與國土保安之落實,其中河川為天然洪水排洩之地區,基於維護民眾生命財產安全之需,政府實施「河川區」劃定政策乃屬必要。然由於事涉區內土地所有權人之權益至鉅,民眾抗爭時起,導致政府施政裹足不前,連帶影響「河川區」劃定政策之執行效力。本文有鑑於此,擬在「制度分析與發展架構」(Institutional Analysis and Development Framework;簡稱IAD)理論上,輔以法制分析就相關議題加以探討。在文章結構安排上,首先評介IAD等相關文獻,藉以作為本文之理論基礎,繼之,從河川區內土地所有權人之觀點,在「財產權保障」之基礎上研析「河川區」劃定政策之相關議題(爭點),最後本文試圖在IAD基點上,從法制與衝突解決觀點就上述議題提出淺見,以供主管機關未來實施「河川區」劃定政策之參考。
Recently, the Taiwan area is under the stronger pressure from the natural disaster. The Government, therefore, is try to solve this issue based on the environmental conservation policy and related measures. Meanwhile, the establishment of the “river zone” is become the most important instrument (management). However, few researchers have focused their attention on examining the important legal institutional challenges surrounding this ecosystem-based management. Though the enforcement of this management has much restriction on the private land-use in the “river zone”. This paper is therefore to analyze related issues based on the concept of the "IAD". In addition, the legal institution approach will be used in the analysis. The structure of this paper can be described as follows: first, the "IAD" and the related literatures will be also reviewed, second, some issues will be analyzed on the viewpoint of the “property rights protection”. At last, some important suggestions will be proposed for the Government.
期刊論文
1.林元興、李欽漢(19961200)。河川用地取得方式之研究。臺灣土地金融季刊,33(4)=130,23-43。  延伸查詢new window
2.Wiener, Jonathan Baert(1999)。Global environmental regulation: Instrument choice in legal context。The Yale Law Journal,108,677-800。  new window
3.Posner, R. A.(1983)。Statutory Interpretation: in the Classroom and in the Courtroom。The University of Chicago Law Review,50(2),800-822。  new window
4.張英磊(20010800)。由經濟分析之觀點談損害填補制度與行政管制之關係。月旦法學,75,128-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.羅傳賢(19900700)。行政聽證程序法制與民權保障。經社法制論叢,6,241-264。  延伸查詢new window
6.莊素珠(20010400)。河川區域內土地使用管制與所有權限制之研究--以山坡地國土保安用地為例。現代地政,21(4)=238,50-53。  延伸查詢new window
7.廖義男(19990400)。計畫確定程序規範之探討--行政程序法立法中爭論之議題。臺灣本土法學雜誌,1,20-36。  延伸查詢new window
8.謝婷士(20011200)。劃定土地使用分區「河川區」之探討。水利,11,116-124。  延伸查詢new window
9.Derzko, N. M.(1996)。Using Intellectual Property La and Regulatory Processes to Foster the Innovation and Diffusion of Environmental Technologies。The Harvard Environmental Law Review,20(1),3-59。  new window
10.Fiorino, D. J.(1999)。Rethinking Environmental Regulatory-Perspectives on Law and Government。The Harvard Environmental Law Review,23(2),1-30。  new window
11.Innes, R.(1999)。Self-Policing and Optimal Law Enforcement when Violator Remediation is Valuable。Journal of Political Economy,107(6),1305-1325。  new window
12.Keohane, N. O.、Revesz, R. L.、Stavins, R. N.(1998)。The Choice of Regulatory Instruments in Environmental Policy。Harvard Environmental Law Review,22(2),313-367。  new window
13.Spiller, P. T.(1999)。Strategic Instruments, Legal Structure and Game in Administrative Law。Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization,15(2),349-377。  new window
14.陳銘祥(19980100)。政策與法律。經社法制論叢,21,41-62。  延伸查詢new window
15.Imperial, Mark T.(1999)。Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: the institutional analysis and development framework。Environmental Management,24(4),449-465。  new window
學位論文
1.賴亞伶(1997)。台灣省有河川浮覆地管理與利用問題之研究(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡慧姿(2001)。九二一震災農村社區土地重劃衝突及管理模式之研究--以南投縣埔里鎮珠子山農村社區為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Scheberle, Denise(1997)。Federalism and Environmental Policy: Trust and the Politics of Implementation。Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press。  new window
2.Wright, Deil S.(1988)。Understanding Intergovernmental Relations。Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
3.內政部營建署綜合計畫組(2001)。區域計畫與河川區劃定之關係與宗旨。台北:內政部營建署。  延伸查詢new window
4.尤重道(1999)。特殊用地之使用管理:河川地、浮覆地、山坡地暨林業用地。台北:永然出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳明燦(2001)。財產權保障、土地使用限制與損失補償專書。台北:翰蘆出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.經濟部水利處(2000)。河川區劃定事宜說明概要。台北:經濟部水利處。  延伸查詢new window
7.Albrod, M.(1995)。Entschädigungsbedürftige Inhalts- und Schrankenbestimmungen des Eigentums nach Art. 14 I 1,2 GG. Europäische Hochschulschriften: Rhein 2, Rechtswissenschaft。Köln。  new window
8.Challen, R.(2000)。Institution, Transaction Costs and Environmental Policy。Edward Elgar。  new window
9.Mercuro, N.(1988)。Toward a Comparative Institutional Approach to the Study of Law and Economics。  new window
10.Miers, D. R.、Page, A. C.(1982)。Legislation。London:Sweet & Maxwell。  new window
11.行政院經濟建設委員會(1996)。國土綜合開發計畫。臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Klöpfer, M.、Klöpfer, M.(1993)。Langzeitverantwortung im Umweltstaat。Langzeitverantwortung im Umweltstaat。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top