臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：景觀環境的偏好、心理效益認知與生理反應之研究
書刊名：造園學報
作者：曾慈慧 引用關係／凌德麟／毛慧芬
作者(外文)：Tseng, Tzu-hui／Ling, Der-lin／Mao, Hui-fen
出版日期：2002
卷期：8:2
頁次：頁45-66
主題關鍵詞：景觀評估；生理心理學；心理效益認知；Landscape evaluation；Psychophysiology；Psychological benefit cognizance
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:301
景觀評估研究原多運用心理學與社會學研究法，近年來運用心理生理學(psycho-physiology)方式加以研究(Tarrant et al., 1994)。本研究以心理學、生理心理學(Psycho-physiology)來探討接受景觀環境刺激時景觀偏好與景觀生、心理學的相關性。 研究的研究結果發現： 1.自然向度的景觀偏好顯著大於人工向度，與Kaplan&Kaplan (1987)所提出的理論相同；而景觀環境開放與封閉向度則未獲統計驗證。 2.自然向度的心理效益反應明顯高於人工向度，與Ulrich(1979)、Kaplan(1989, 1995)的部分研究得到相互驗證；但開放-封閉向度中未獲得統計上的檢定顯著性。 3.景觀環境差異對生理反應值的假設這次未獲顯著驗證，但Wise and Rosenberg在1998年曾提出疏林風景可顯著降低生理壓力(Relf, 1992)。 4.景觀偏好與心理效益認知之間有顯著正相關，高偏好景觀環境通常也會帶來高的心理效益認知，如此可以經由視覺偏好而形成心理回饋。 5.自然與封閉景觀環境的偏好者的生理反應是較舒緩的，而人工與開放景觀環境的偏好者的生理反應是較緊張的。 自然類景觀環境在偏好、心理效益認知中比人工環境高，高偏好的景觀環境是規劃設計時所追求的目標，而自然與封閉景觀環境偏好者的生理反應是較舒緩，因而在規劃舒緩、放鬆的場所空間時，可考量自然與封閉的景觀環境。
Most landscape evaluation research is utilizing psychological and sociological science research methods; in addition, the psychophysiological methods have been gaining its popularity in recent years. This study is based on the fundamental concepts of psychology and psychophysiology to explore the relationship among landscape preference, physical response and psychological benefit cognizance after the subjects have been stimulated/influenced by landscape environment. The experiment results are as follows: 1.The subjects preferred a naturally formed landscape more than the artificaial one. This result matches the Kaplan&Kaplan Theory of 1987. However, the experiment result of the correlation between open landscape and enclos landscape was not statistically sig nificance. 2.The psychological benefit cognizance of naturally formed landscape is obviously higher than the artificial one. This result also coincides a portion of Ulrich's research in 1979 and Kaplan's research in 1989 and 1995. Nevertheless, similar to the result of samply audience, the empirical result of the correlation between open landscape and enclos landscape was not statistically significance either. 3.The result of physical response was not statistical significant enough to warrant a further study; however, Wise and Rosenberg has found that exposing the selected audience to the Savanna Landscape can reduce the sample audience's stress level tremendously. 4.There is a positive correlation between landscape preferenceand psychological benefit cognizance; the greater landscape preference, the greater the psychological benefit cognizance. Consequently, the higher the visual preference rewards the greater psychological benefits. 5.The physical response of the subjeces audience who prefere naturally formed and closure landscapes is more relaxed. On the other hand, for those who prefere artificial and open landscapes, they have more stressed physical responses.
期刊論文
1.Parsons, R.(1995)。Conflict between ecological sustainability and environmental aesthetics: conundrum, canard or curiosity。Landscape and Urban planning，32(3)，227-244。  new window
2.Tarrant, M. A.、Manfredo, M. J.、Driver, B. L.(1994)。Recollections of outdoor recreation experiences: a psycho physiological perspective。Journal of Leisure Research，26(4)，357-371。  new window
3.Barnhart, S. K.、Perkins, N. H.、Fitzsimonds, J.(1998)。Behaviour and outdoor setting preferences at a psychiatric hospital。Landscape and Urban Planning，42，147-156。  new window
4.Kaplan, R.(1973)。Some Psychological Benefits of Gardening。Environment and Behavior，5(2)，145-162。  new window
5.張俊彥(20000800)。造園設計中植栽色彩對觀賞者效益之研究。造園學報，7(1)，45-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Ulrich, R. S.(1979)。Visual Landscape and Psychological Well-being。Landscape Research，4(1)，17-23。  new window
7.Purcell, A.、Lamb, R.(1984)。Landscape perception: an examination and empirical investigation of two central issues in the area。Journal of Environment Management，19，31-63。  new window
8.Schroeder, H. W.(1990)。Perceptions and preferences of urban forest users。Journal of Arboriculture，16(3)，58-61。  new window
9.胡悅倫(19980400)。社會支持、作業難度對兒童壓力下生理反應之影響。Proceedings of the National Science Council. Part C, Humanities and Social Sciences，8(2)，195-225。  延伸查詢new window
10.張俊彥、曾慈慧(20000600)。醫院景觀環境差異對病人生心理反應之研究--以消化性潰瘍與膽（輸尿管）結石病患住院期間為例。中國園藝，46(2)，231-246。  延伸查詢new window
11.張俊彥、萬麗玲(20000800)。景觀型態對肌電值及注意力恢復能力之研究。造園學報，7(1)，1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Change, C. Y.、Perng, J. L.(1998)。Effect of landscape on psychological and physical responses。Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture，9(1)，73-76。  new window
13.Herzog, T. R.、Black, A. M.、Fountaine, K. A.、Knotts, D. J.(1997)。Reflection and Attentional Recovery as Distinctive Benefits of Restorative Environments。Journal of Environmental Psychology，17(2)，165-170。  new window
14.Ulrich, R. S.(1984)。View through a window may influence recovery from surgery。Science，224(4647)，420-421。  new window
15.Ulrich, R. S.(1986)。Human responses to vegetation and landscape。Landscape and Urban Planning，13，29-44。  new window
16.Kaplan, S.(1987)。Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective。Environment and Behavior，19(1)，3-32。  new window
17.張俊彥、曾慈慧(19991000)。太空劇場影片中景觀元素對觀眾生心理反應之研究。博物館學季刊，13(4)，99-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Kaplan, S.(1995)。The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework。Journal of Environmental Psychology，15(3)，169-182。  new window
19.Purcell, A. T.、Lamb, R. J.、Peron, E. Mainardi、Falchero, S.(1995)。Preference or preferences for landscape。Journal of Environmental Psychology，14(3)，57-63。  new window
20.Ulrich, R. S.(1981)。Natural versus urban scenes: Some psycho physiological effects。Environment and Behavior，13(5)，523-556。  new window
21.Zube, Ervin H.、Sell, James L.、Taylor, Jonathan G.(1982)。Landscape perception: Research, application and theory。Landscape Planning，9(1)，1-33。  new window
22.Hartig, Terry Alan、Mang, Marlis、Evans, Gary W.(1991)。Restorative effects of natural environment experiences。Environment and Behavior，23(1)，3-26。  new window
會議論文
1.歐聖榮、李美芬(2001)。景觀空間封閉感及偏好知覺之研究。2001休閒、遊憩、觀光研究成果研討會。臺中。87-105。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳炳錕、張俊彥(2001)。辦公室環境中窗景與植栽對使用者效益之研究。2001休閒、遊憩、觀光研究成果研討會。臺中。37-53。  延伸查詢new window
3.張俊彥、洪佳君(2001)。水景形式與生心理反應關係之研究。2001休閒、遊憩、觀光研究成果研討會。臺中。106-115。  延伸查詢new window
4.張俊彥、陳炳錕(2001)。辦公室環境中窗景與植栽對使用者效益之研究。2001休閒、遊憩、觀光研究成果研討會。臺中。161-181。  延伸查詢new window
5.Schroeder, H. W.(1986)。Psychological Value of Urban Trees: Measurement, Meanings, and Imagination。The Third National Urban Forestry Conference。Washington, DC：American Forestry Association。50-60。  new window
6.Ulrich, R. S.、Simons, R. F.(1986)。Recovery from stress during exposure to everyday outdoor environments。The Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association，(會議日期: Aprils 1986)。Washington, DC：EDRA。115-122。  new window
學位論文
1.謝昱男(2001)。檜木氣味對人體生理與心理反應之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱玫芳(1996)。勞工工作壓力之探討 專題一：勞工工作壓力量表之建立 專題二：勞工工作壓力心理生理反應測定與工作壓力量表臨界值之建立(碩士論文)。高雄醫學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Selye, H.(1974)。Stress without distress。Philadephia, PA：J.B. Lippincott。  new window
2.Kaplan, Rachel、Kaplan, Stephen(1989)。The experience of nature: A psychological perspective。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Ulrich, R. S.、Parsons, R.(1992)。Influences of passive experiences with plants on individual well-being and health。The Role of Horticulture in Human Well-being and Social Development。Timber Press。  new window
2.Ulrich, Roger S.(1983)。Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment。Human behavior and environment, vol.6: Behavior and natural environment。New York, NY：Plenum Press。  new window
3.Kaplan, R.(1992)。The psychological benefits of nearby nature。The role of horticulture in human well-being and social development: a national aymposium。New York。  new window
4.Dawson, M. E.、Schell, A. M.、Filion, D. L.(1990)。The electrodermal system。Principles of psychophysiology: Physical, social, and inferential element。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Haller, R.(1992)。Vocational, social and therapeutic programs in horticulture。The Role of Horticulture in Human Well-being and social development。Portland：Timber Press。  new window
6.Honeyman, M. K.(1992)。Vegetation and stress: A comparison study of varying amount of human well-being and social development。The Role of Horticulture in Human Wellbeing and social development。Portland：Timber Press。  new window
7.Kaplan, S.(1992)。The restorative environment: nature and human experience。The Role of Horticulture in Human Well-being and social development。Portland, OR：Timber Press。  new window
8.Knopf, R. C.(1987)。Human Behavior, Cognition, and Affect in the Natural Environment。Handbook of Environmental Psychology。New York：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
9.Relf, P. D.(1992)。People- plant relationship。The Role of Horticulture in Human Well-being and social development。Portland：Timber Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：867（臺灣：857，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2516201 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68317954
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上