臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：Comparison Affective Dispositions Toward Critical Thinking Across Chinese and American Baccalaureate Nursing Students
書刊名：The Journal of Nursing Research
作者：葉美玲 引用關係／陳興夏 引用關係
作者(外文)：Yeh, Mei-ling／Chen, Hsing-hsia
出版日期：2003
卷期：11:1
頁次：頁39-46
主題關鍵詞：情意特質；批判性思維；跨文化研究；Affective dispositions；Critical thinking；Cross-cultural study
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:29
　　　　　本跨文化研究旨在瞭解與比較臺灣與美國護理學生的批判性思維情意特質。本研究以方便取樣自臺灣與美國護理學院中，分別取得214與196位三、四年級的護理學生。"California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory" (CCTDI) 用於測量批判性思維之情意特質。本研究對象中，臺灣學生的年齡自19至28歲 (M = 22, SD = 1.87)，而美國學生的年齡自20至51歲 (M = 28, SD = 6.08)。臺灣學生的七項情意特質皆於標準之上，除了尋求真理、系統性與成熟度三項特質以外。美國學生僅尋求真理特質低於標準，其他的特質皆達標準。臺灣與美國護生的每個次量表(特質)的項目平均值達統計上的顯著差異 [F(1, 408) = 54.11, p < .01]，跨越次量表亦然 [F(6, 2448) = 905, p < .01]。其中尋求真理 [t(408) = 14.70, p < .001]、公正無私 [t(408) = 6.17, p < .001]、分析性 [t(408) = 4.73, p < .001]、成熟度 [t(408) = 10.46, p < .001] 等皆達統計上的顯著差異。此研究提供了相關資訊使之能瞭解臺灣與美國護理學生的批判性思維情意特質，其中的不同或許源自於文化、教與學習慣上的差異。
　　　　　The purpose of this cross-cultural study is to understand and compare affective dispositions toward critical thinking across Chinese and American cultures. Two convenience samples of 214 and 196 undergraduate nursing students were obtained in Taiwan and the USA, respectively. The California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory (CCTDI) was used to measure critical thinking dispositions. The ages of the students in these samples ranged from 19 to 28 (M = 22, SD = 1.87) for the Chinese sample, and from 20 to 51 (M = 28, SD = 6.08) for the American. For the Chinese sample, all means of the seven subscale scores were above 40, except for truth seeking, systematicity and maturity. For the American sample, all means of the seven subscale scores were above 40, except for truth seeking. The mean item responses for each subscale were significantly different between the two samples [F(1, 408) = 54.11, p < .01] and across the subscales [F(6, 2448) = 905, p < .01]. Significant differences between the two samples were also found in truth-seeking, t(408) = 14.70 (p < .001), open-mindedness, t(408) = 6.17 (p < .001), systematicity, t(408) = 4.73 (p < .001) and maturity, t(408) = 10.46 (p < .001). The findings provide information to understand affective dispositions toward critical thinking in either Chinese or American students. The differences may contribute to the cultural differences shown in their dispositions.
期刊論文
1.Colucciello, M. L.(1997)。Critical thinking skills and dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students - A conceptual model for evaluation。Journal of Professional Nursing，13(4)，236-245。  new window
2.Facione, N. C.、Facione, P. A.、Sanchez, C. A.(1994)。Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: The development of the California critical thinking disposition inventory。Journal of Nursing Education，33(8)，345-350。  new window
3.Facione, N. C.、Facione, P. A.(1995)。Externalizing the critical thinking in knowledge development and clinical judgment。Nursing Outlook，44(3)，129-136。  new window
4.Facione, Peter A.、Sánchez, Carol A.、Facione, Noreen C.、Gainen, Joanne(1995)。The disposition toward critical thinking。The Journal of General Education，44(1)，1-25。  new window
5.Behrens, P. J.(1996)。The Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal and academic performance of diploma school students。Journal of Nursing Education，35(1)，34-36。  new window
6.Colucciello, M. L.(1999)。Relationships between critical thinking dispositions and learning styles。Journal of Professional Nursing，15(5)，294-301。  new window
7.Facione, N. C.、Facione, P. A.(1996)。Assessment design issues for evaluating critical thinking in nursing。Holistic Nursing Practice，10(3)，41-53。  new window
8.Gross, Y. T.、Takazawa, E. S.、Ross, C. C.(1987)。Critical thinking and nursing education。Journal of Nursing Education，26(8)，317-323。  new window
9.Howenstein, M. A.、Bilodeau, K.、Brogna, M. J.、Good, G.(1996)。Factors associated with critical thinking among nurses。Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing，27(3)，100-103。  new window
10.Ip, W. Y.、Lee, D. T. F.、Lee, I. F. K.、Chau, J. P. C.、Wootton, Y. S. Y.、Chang, A. M.(2000)。Disposition toward critical thinking: A study of Chinese undergraduate nursing students。Journal of Advanced Nursing，32(1)，84-90。  new window
11.Kataoka-Yahiro, M.、Saylor, C.(1994)。A critical thinking model for nursing judgment。Journal of Nursing Education，33(8)，351-356。  new window
12.Tiessen, J. B.(1987)。Critical thinking and selected correlates among baccalaureate nursing students。Journal of Professional Nursing，2(2)，118-123。  new window
13.Yeh, M. L.(2001)。Assessing reliability and validity of Chinese version of California critical thinking dispositions inventory。International Journal of Nursing Studies，39，1-10。  new window
14.Walsh, C. M.、Hardy, R. C.(1999)。Dispositional differences in critical thinking related to gender and academic major。Journal of Nursing Education，38(4)，149-155。  new window
會議論文
1.Sanchez, C. A.、Reise, S. P.、Facione, P. A.、Facione, N. C.(1994)。Personality correlates of critical thinking in college students。Los Angeles, CA。  new window
圖書
1.American Psychological Association(1990)。Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction。Millbrae, CA：The California Academic Press。  new window
2.Facione, P. A.,、Facione, N. C.(1992)。Test manual: The California critical thinking dispositions inventory。Millbrae, CA：California Academic Press。  new window
3.Fairbank, John King、Reischauer, Edwin O.、Craig, Albert M.(1989)。East Asia: Tradition and transformation。Boston, MA：Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
4.Facione, N. C.(1995)。Critical thinking and clinical judgment: Goals 2000 for nursing science。Critical thinking and clinical judgment: Goals 2000 for nursing science。San Diego, CA。  new window
5.Facione, P. A.(1991)。Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts。Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts。Millbrae, CA。  new window
6.Hu, J. C.(1995)。A brief introduction to the Republic of China。A brief introduction to the Republic of China。Taipei。  new window
7.Kuo, E.(1989)。My country: Questions and answers about the Republic of China on Taiwan。My country: Questions and answers about the Republic of China on Taiwan。New York, NY。  new window
8.Nan, H. C.(1982)。New interpretations of the analects of Confucius。New interpretations of the analects of Confucius。Taipei。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
1. 臺灣與美國小學教學現況比較：曾任兩地導師的現場觀察
2. A Comparative Analysis on the Treatment of Market Manipulation Under Regulation of Futures Market between U.S. and Taiwan
3. A Comparative Study on the Patentability and Patent Scope of Transgenic Animals: The United States, the European Union and Taiwan
4. 社會關係的類型和效應：臺灣、美國、中國大陸的三地比較
5. 高級中等學校學生批判思考態度量表發展之研究
6. Remedies of Patent Infringement--A Focus on Comparative Study for Taiwanese Corporation's Patent Litigation in the U.S. Market
7. 臺灣與美國青少年心理健康泛文化比較之研究
8. Learning Style and Personality Type Profiles of Hospitality Undergraduate Students of Taiwan and the United States
9. 美國與臺灣在家教育制度之比較研究--從家長教育權的觀點分析
10. A Comparative Analysis of Job Characteristics, Job Satisfaction, and Intention to Leave in Knowledge Workers and Blue-Collar Workers in Taiwan and the U.S.
11. A Comparative Case Study of Educational Policies between Taiwan Aborigines and American Indians
12. One Aspect of Taiwanese and American Sense of Humor: Attitudes toward Pranks
13. Director's Liability toward the Corporation for Breaching the Duty of Care: Comment on the Current Taiwanese Law from a Comparative Law Study on Case and Statutory Laws in the United States
14. 多元文化教育的發展--美國的經驗與臺灣的反思
15. A Comparison of Death Penalty Opinion Among University Students in the United States and Taiwan
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1092（臺灣：1086，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2564847 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68365472
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上