:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論WTO多邊架構下以特定服務部門為基礎之競爭規範:以GATS電信參考文件為核心
書刊名:政大法學評論
作者:彭心儀 引用關係
作者(外文):Peng, Shin-yi
出版日期:2003
卷期:76
頁次:頁307-366
主題關鍵詞:世界貿易組織服務貿易總協定電信參考文件電信服務部門競爭規範與貿易競爭政策WTOGATSReference paperBasic telecommunications servicesCompetition and tradeCompetition policy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:108
  • 點閱點閱:41
     就法制面觀察,我國電信相關法制似已銜接GATS電信參考文件之基本電信服務監管架構原則。但近年來,外國電信業者對於我國電信服務產業競爭規範,多所質疑,我國應檢討相關競爭政策,以完全符合GATS之要求。此外,我國對於正在進行中之美墨關於電信服務產業競爭規範之爭議,應有高度注意,以確保我國未來在WTO多邊體制下之權益。 WTO架構下以特定服務部門為基礎之競爭規範,對於該特定產業之市場競爭秩序,有其正面實質意義。以電信參考文件為例,首先,將該文件納入額外承諾欄之WTO會員,必須在內國法制實現競爭之防護、網路互連合理化、以及普及服務義務透明化等競爭政策。再者,過去如美國有效競爭準則等雙邊機制,已被GATS電信參考文件所取代,使電信服務產業之競爭規範由雙邊模式轉移到多邊架構之下。 然而,近年相關貿易爭端也呈現了GATS電信參考文件之侷限性。競爭政策之國際化有其本質上之困難。本文針對「特定部門方式」之競爭規範,分析其可行性。在由管制規避與管制俘虜等論點切入後,本文認為,WTO應以整合角度處理競爭政策,提出一套全面的實體競爭規範,並強調在多邊架構下促進競爭政策對於國際貿易發展之整體貢獻。
     We have made significant progress in bringing our telecommunications laws and regulations into compliance with our commitments under the GATS. However, more work needs to be done to effectively prevent anticompetitive practices. Particular attention should be given to the ongoing dispute between the U.S. and Mexico being brought before the WTO. It is a good opportunity for the "Reference Paper" to actually go through the dispute resolution process so that some sort of precedent exists and we can obtain a surer understanding of what the actual meaning of the Reference paper. Most governments included commitments on regulatory disciplines based on a Reference Paper which defines competition safeguards, interconnection guarantees, licensing criteria, independence of regulators from operators, and other principles for the regulatory framework for basic telecommunications services. The U.S. ECO test, for example, has been modified by the 1997 Foreign Entry Order. The Reference Paper, therefore, is revolutionary. Domestic competition policies regarding telecommunications services are being multilateralized. This article discusses the limits of the sector-specific competition rules under GATS. Sectoral approaches can serve as a model for the future liberalization of other regulated industries. The sector-sepcific competition rules are, however, exposed to the risks of regulatory bypass and regulatory capture. Substantive competition principles should be applicable to all economic sectors under the WTO to enhance the integration of trade and competition rules in the multilateral framework.
Other
1.羅昌發(199404)。貿易與競爭之法律互動。  延伸查詢new window
期刊論文
1.高凱聲(19990100)。論電信事業價格調整上限管制制度。經社法制論叢,23,31-59。  延伸查詢new window
2.Peng, Shin-Yi(2003)。Universal Telecommunications Service in China: Trade Liberalization, Subsidy, and Technology in the Making of Information Equality in the Broadband Era。Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal,4。  new window
3.羅昌發(20020700)。競爭法與競爭政策之國際合作:我國經驗之回顧與前瞻。公平交易季刊,10(3),145-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.楊光華(20011200)。服務貿易總協定與我國入會承諾。月旦法學,79,28-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Abu-Akeel, Aly K.(1999)。Definition of Trade in Services under the GATS: Legal Implications。George Washingdom Journal of International Law and Economic,32,189-210。  new window
6.劉崇堅、莊懿妃(1996)。電信産業普及服務。經社法制論叢,17/18。  延伸查詢new window
7.彭心儀(2002)。由資訊通信法制之發展趨勢論數位落差之消弭。經社法制論叢,29,259-298。  延伸查詢new window
8.彭心儀(2001)。評析WTO爭端解決小組對於「美國貿易法第三0一至三一0條款」案之報告。進口救濟論叢,18,93-131。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊光華(2002)。競爭法與競爭政策之國際合作。公平交易季刊,10(3),161-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Addis, A.(2000)。Who's Afraid of Foreigners? The Restrictions on Alien Ownership of Electronic Media。Columbia Human Rights Law Review,32。  new window
11.Collins, K.(2000)。International Accounting Rate Reform: The Role of International Organizations and Implications for Developing Countries。Law and Policy in International Business,31,1077。  new window
12.Kenefick, P. W.(2000)。A Step in the Right Direction: The FCC Provides Regulatory Relief in International Settlements and International Services Licensing。CommLaw,8。  new window
13.Kennedy, K. C.(2001)。Foreign Direct Investment and Competition Policy at the World Trade Organization。The George Washington International Law Review,33。  new window
14.Lake, C. D.(2000)。Comments Regarding the General Agreement on Trade in Services。Law and Policy in International Business,31。  new window
15.Paladini, V. M.(1996)。Foreign Ownership Restrictions Under Section 310(B) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996。Boston University International Law Journal,14。  new window
16.Schmidt, E. W.(1997)。International Telecommunications Transactions: A Critique of the FCC's 'Effective Competitive Opportunities Analysis'。Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law,7。  new window
17.Sidak, J. G.(1998)。Deregulation and Managed Competition in Network Industries。Yale Journal on Regulation,15。  new window
18.Sidak, J. Gregory、Rohlfs, Jeffrey H.(2002)。Exporting Telecommunications Regulation: The United States-Japan Negotiations on Interconnection Pricing。Harvard International Law Journal,43(2),317。  new window
會議論文
1.彭心儀(2003)。WTO之GATS協定與資訊通信科技:視聽服務貿易自由化下之文化政策爭議。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃立(1999)。OECD對競爭政策的處理及其對多邊體制之影響。沒有紀錄。207-246。  延伸查詢new window
3.Brinkmann, K.(2001)。The Year in Wireless Telecommunications。沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書
1.JACKSON JOHN H. et al.,(1995)。International Economic Regulations。沒有紀錄。  new window
2.Benjamin, S. M.、Lichtman, D. G.、Shelanski, H. A.(2001)。Telecommunications Law and Policy。Durham, NC:Carolina Academic Press。  new window
3.羅昌發(199910)。國際貿易法。月旦出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.張新平(19960000)。世界貿易組織下之服務貿易。臺北:月旦出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.彭心儀(2002)。美國資訊通信法案例評析:1991-2002 案例精選。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃立、李貴英、林彩瑜(2001)。WTO:國際貿易法論。臺北:元照出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Spiwak, Lawrence J.(2000)。The Telecoms Trade War: The United States, The European Union, and the World Trade Organization。  new window
8.Hoekman, Bernard M.、Kosteck, Michel M.(1995)。The Political Economy of the World Trading System: From GATT to WTO。Oxford University Press。  new window
9.羅昌發(1994)。美國貿易法中三0一報復條款之研究。美國貿易救濟制度:國際經貿法研究(一)。0。  延伸查詢new window
10.交通部電信總局(2001)。電信自由化工作小組議題與結論。電信自由化工作小組議題與結論。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳國慈(2001)。科技企業與智慧財產。科技企業與智慧財產。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳櫻琴(1999)。國際組織競爭議題-兼論臺灣產業國際競爭觀點。商事法暨財經法論文集:王仁宏教授六十歲生日祝賀論文集。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
13.彭心儀(2003)。「第三代行動通信業務管理規則」總評-無線通信業者所面臨之問題與建議,電信法制新紀元。「第三代行動通信業務管理規則」總評-無線通信業者所面臨之問題與建議,電信法制新紀元。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
14.Jenny, F.(1999)。Globalization, Competition and Trade Policy: Issues and Challenges。Towards WTO Competition Rules。沒有紀錄。  new window
15.Cass, Ronald A.(1998)。International Trade in Telecommunications。  new window
16.Huber, P.(1997)。Pricing。Law and Disorder in Cyberspace-Abolish the FCC and Let Common Law Rule the Telecommunications。沒有紀錄。  new window
17.Kennedy, K. C.(2001)。Competition Law and the World Trade Organization: The Limits of Multilateralism。London:Sweet & Maxwell。  new window
其他
1.Yue, W. C.(1994)。The International Regulation of Trade,沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書論文
1.劉孔中(2001)。電信管制革新政策與法規之檢討。管制革新。台北:中央研究院人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Petersmann, E. U.(1999)。Competition-Oriented Reforms of the WTO World Trade System-Proposals and Policy Options。Towards WTO competition Rules。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE