:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Income Inequality and Tenure Polarisation in Scotland
書刊名:長榮大學學報
作者:謝博明
作者(外文):Hsieh, Bor-ming
出版日期:2004
卷期:8:2
頁次:頁59-74
主題關鍵詞:所得不均等同家戶所得吉尼係數住宅權屬極化Income inequalityEquivalent household incomeGini-coefficientTenure polarisation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:21
本文主要分析蘇格蘭家戶所得與住宅權屬分配情形,並強調所得不均與住宅租買權屬的極化現象。本文利用15,000 筆以上之蘇格蘭家戶資料予以分析,其資料包含家戶之所得與住宅權屬與家戶人口特性等資料。所得資料在本文為家戶所得,並隨家戶大小與戶長之年齡而調整。家戶所得之調整係以麥克來蒙所得調整比例(McClements Sale) ,稱為「等同家戶所得」。本文運用所得五等分和吉尼係數分析五種不同之住宅權屬於蘇格蘭地區及其四個主要城市。經由研究結果發現,整個蘇格蘭地區(包含四個主要城市)存在著所得極化的情形,尤其以有貸款自用住宅家戶與公有出租住宅住戶之間最為明顯。有貸款的自用住宅家戶明顯的集中在高所得階層,反之,公有出租住宅住戶則是集中在最後百分之四十的所得分布階層。再者,分析各所得階層的權屬分布時,更明顯存在著有貸款自用住宅家戶與公有出租住宅住戶間所得的兩極化現象。對於此顯著的所得與住宅權屬的極化現象,蘇格蘭政府相關部門應予以重視並謀求改善對策。而此分析結果與相關對策亦可供國內住宅發展與政策擬定之參考。
This paper analyses the distribution of household income and tenure pattern in Scotland, emphasising income inequality and tenure polarisation. The paper is able to employ data on more than 15,000 Scottish households, including rich information of household income, tenure and demographic characteristics. The income used in this paper is household income and is adjusted by household size and householders’ age. Household income adjusted by the McClements scale is called ‘equivalent household income.’ This paper uses the income quintile share and the Gini-coefficient to analyse income inequality between five different tenures in the whole of Scotland level and in the four major city level. The results show that, in both the Scotland and the city levels, there exists a significant income polarisation between mortgaged owners and local authority tenants. The mortgaged owners are concentrated in upper income groups while local authority tenants are concentrated in the bottom two income quintile groups. Moreover, in the analysis of tenure distribution between income levels, the results show a clear picture of tenure polarisation, specifically for mortgaged owners and local authority tenants, within income quintile groups. The significance of income inequality and tenure polarisation has implications in Scotland’s housing policy. The results of income and tenure polarisation in Scotland and its policy reform also have implications to Taiwan’s housing development and housing policy.
期刊論文
1.Bentham, G.(1986)。Socio-tenurial polarisation in the United Kingdom, 1953-1983: the Income Evidence。Urban Studies,23,57-62。  new window
2.Burrows, R.、Ford, J.、Wilcox, S.(2000)。Half the poor? Policy responses to the growth of low-income home-ownership。Housing Finance Review,11-20。  new window
3.Central Statistical Office(1987)。The effects of taxes and benefits on household income。Economic Trends,405,100-117。  new window
4.Hamnett, C.(1984)。Housing the two nations: Social-tenurial polarization in England and Wales, 1961-81。Urban Studies,21,389-405。  new window
5.Hamnett, C.(1996)。Social Polarisation, Economic Restructuring and Welfare State Regimes。Urban Studies,33(8),1407-1430。  new window
6.Hancock, K.、Munro, M.(1992)。Housing subsidies, inequality and affordability: Evidence from Glasgow。Fiscal Studies,13,11-91。  new window
7.Holmans, A.(1978)。Housing tenure in England and Wales: The present situation and recent trends。Social Trends,9,10-14。  new window
8.Jenkins, S.(1991)。Income inequality and living standards: Changes in the 1970s and 1980s。Fiscal Studies,12,1-28。  new window
9.Jenkins, S.、Cowell, F.(1994)。Dwarfs and giants in the 1980s: Trends in the UK income distribution。Fiscal Studies,15,99-118。  new window
10.Robinson, R.、O'Sullivan, T.、Le Grand, J.(1985)。Inequality and housing。Urban Studies,22,249-256。  new window
11.Saunders, P.(1984)。Beyond housing classes: The sociological significance of private property rights in means of consumption。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,5,202-225。  new window
12.Tsaur, T. W.、Chang, J. R.(2000)。The allocation of family characteristics and the distribution of family income: The case of Taiwan。Arts and Social Science,10(3),344-361。  new window
13.Hamnett, Chris(1994)。Social Polarisation in Global Cities: Theory and Evidence。Urban Studies,31(3),401-424。  new window
14.Murie, A.(1991)。Divisions of homeownership: Housing tenure and social change。Environment and Planning,23,349-370。  new window
15.Hancock, K.(1993)。Can pay? Won't pay? or economic principles of affordability?。Urban Studies,30(1),127-145。  new window
會議論文
1.Hills, J.(2000)。Reviewing social housing finance。IPPR Social Housing Forum Discussion Paper。London:Institute of Public Policy Research。  new window
圖書
1.Bailey, N.(1999)。Edinburgh and Glasgow: Contrasts in competitiveness and cohesion. Interim Report of the Central Scotland Integrative Case Study。Glasgow:Department of Urban Studies,University of Glasgow。  new window
2.Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions(2000)。Quality and choice: A decent home for all,the housing green paper。London:DETR。  new window
3.Forrest, R.、Murie, A.、Williams, P.(1990)。Home ownership: Differentiation andfragmentation。London:Unwin Hyman。  new window
4.Hills, J.(1995)。Inquiry into income and wealth, Volume 2: A summary of the evidence。New York:Joseph Rowntree Foundation。  new window
5.Scottish Homes(1997)。Main report of 1996 Scottish house condition survey。Edinburgh:Scottish Homes。  new window
圖書論文
1.Gray, F.(1982)。Owner-occupation and social relations。Owner-occupation in Britain。London:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
2.Hills, J.(1998)。Housing: A decent home within the reach of every family?。The state of welfare: The economics of social spending。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Smith, R.(2000)。Allocating social housing: Trends, proposals and prospects。Housing Finance Review 2000/2001。New York:Joseph Rowntree Foundation。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE