:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣消費不均度的變化
書刊名:社會科學論叢
作者:洪明皇 引用關係
作者(外文):Hong, Ming-hwang
出版日期:2012
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁73-103
主題關鍵詞:消費不均吉尼係數分解經濟福利臺灣Consumption inequalityDecomposition of the Gini coefficientEconomic well-beingsTaiwan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:91
  • 點閱點閱:219
本研究以台灣1980-2007年家庭收支調查為實證資料,利用吉尼係數分解與計算百分位家戶所得與消費成長率,探討1990年代中期以後總消費不均度下降的原因。主要研究發現有兩項:一、總消費不均度下降的主要原因,是保健與房租支出對總消費不均度具平均化的作用,且其不均貢獻度愈來愈大。保健支出份額上升,與台灣人口老化及1995年實施的全民健保險制度有關。二、台灣1996年以來總消費不均度下降的現象並非好事。總消費不均度之所以下降,是因為絕大多數家戶的所得無成長而造成整體消費變異性不大,尤其是低所得家戶的所得無成長但保健與房租支出卻相當高。
This study selected information from the Family Income and Expenditure Survey from 1980 to 2007 as empirical data. We decomposed the Gini coefficients and calculated the percentile distribution of the growth rates of household income and expenditure to identify the reasons for the decline in total consumption inequality since the mid-1990s. The results of this study are presented below. First, medical and rent expenses had an equalizing effect on total consumption inequality. The increasing consumption inequality share of medical and health expenses in Taiwan is related to an aging population and the implementation of National Health Insurance in 1995. Second, the decline in total consumption inequality since 1996 is not a positive phenomenon. Most households have experienced an economic decline since 1996. This lack of income growth has limited the growth of total consumption, leading to invariable household expenditure. Particularly, low-income households are spending a substantially greater portion of their income on medical and rent expenses although their income has had minimal growth.
期刊論文
1.孫煒、Gindling, T. H.(20001200)。Educational Expansion and Earnings Inequality in Taiwan: 1978-1995。人文及社會科學集刊,12(4),597-629。new window  new window
2.Buhmann, Brigitte、Rainwater, Lee、Schmaus, Guenther、Smeeding, Timothy M.(1988)。Equivalence Scales, Well-Being, Inequality, and Poverty: Sensitivity Es-timates Across Ten Countries Using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) Data-base。Review of Income & Wealth,34(2),115-142。  new window
3.王永慈(19951200)。我國直接稅的所得再分配效果--兼論等值量表的敏感性。國立臺灣大學社會學刊,24,211-237。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳孟甫、林弘文(20070600)。1994-2005年臺灣家庭所得不均度的分解與變化分析。臺灣經濟論衡,5(6),1-22。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳建良(20070600)。1980年至2000年臺灣擁屋家戶儲蓄行為之變遷:分量迴歸分析的新發現。住宅學報,16(1),57-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Lerman, Robert I.、Yitzhaki, Shlomo(1985)。Income inequality effects by income source: A new approach and applications to the United States。The Review of Economics and Statistics,67(1),151-156。  new window
7.洪明皇、鄭文輝(2007)。所得定義與均等值設定對經濟福利不均的測量影響。經濟研究,45(1),11-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.彭素玲、郭迺鋒、周濟、方文秀(200903)。人口年齡結構、所得分配與產業結構轉型對臺灣民間消費與總體產出之影響。臺灣經濟預測與政策,39(2),51-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.曹添旺(19960900)。臺灣家庭所得不均度的分解與變化試析,1980-1993。人文及社會科學集刊,8(2),181-219。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.王德睦、何華欽、呂朝賢(20030400)。兒童與成人基本生活費用的差異。調查研究,13,5-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.于宗先(2008)。M型社會的隱憂。經濟前瞻,119,91-95。  延伸查詢new window
12.Cutler, David M.、Katz, Lawrence F.(1992)。Rising Inequality? Changes in the Distribution of Income and Consumption in the 1980's。American Economic Review,82(2),546-551。  new window
13.Attanasio, Orazio、Berloffa, Gabriella、Blundel, Richard l、Preston, Ian.(2002)。From Earnings Inequality to Consumption Inequality。Economic Journal,112(418),52-59。  new window
14.Barreti, Garry、Crossley, Thomas、Worswick, Christopher(2000)。Consumption and Income Inequality in Australia。Economic Record,76(33),116-138。  new window
15.Blundell, Richard、Preston, Ian.(1998)。Consumption Inequality and Income Un-certainty。Quarterly Journal of Economics,113(2),603-640。  new window
16.Blundell, Richard、Pistaferri, Luigi、Preston, Ian.(2008)。Consumption Inequality and Partial Insurance。American Economic Review,98(5),1887-1921。  new window
17.Casado, Jose Maria.(2011)。From Income to Consumption: Measuring Households Partial Insurance。Empirical Economics,40(2),471-495。  new window
18.Fei, John C. H.、Rains, Gustav、Kuo, Shirley W. Y.(1978)。Growth and the Family Distribution of Income by Factor Components。The Quarterly Journal of Economics,92(1),17-53。  new window
19.Garner, Thesia I.(1993)。Consumer Expenditure and Inequality: An Analysis Based on Decomposition of the Gini Coefficient。Review of Economics and Statistics,75(1),134-138。  new window
20.Gouveia, Miguel、Tavares, Jose.(1995)。The Distribution of Household Income and Expenditure in Portugal: 1980 and 1990。Review of Income and Wealth,41(1),1-17。  new window
21.Lopez-Feldman, Alejandro(2006)。Decomposing Inequality and Obtaining Marginal Effects。The Stata Journal of Marriage and the Family,6(1),106-111。  new window
22.McGregor, Patrick、Borooah, Vani.(1992)。Is Low Spending or Low Income a Better Indicator of Whether or Not a Household is Poor: Some Results from the 1985 Family Expenditure Survey。Journal of Social Policy,21(1),53-69。  new window
23.Slesnick, Daniel T.(1994)。Consumption, Needs and Inequality。International Economic Review,35(3),677-703。  new window
24.Zaidi, M. Asghar、Vos, Klaas de.(2001)。Trends in Consumption-based Poverty and Inequality in the European Union during the 1980s。Journal of Population Economics,14(2),367-390。  new window
會議論文
1.鄭文輝(2007)。台灣社會福利制度的演進。2007年海峽兩岸財稅學術研討會--建立繁榮、安定的福利社會研討會。瀋陽:中華財政學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱敬一、鄭保志(2006)。哲人日已遠,典型在夙昔:紀念費景漢院士。台北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.行政院主計處(2008)。人力運用調査報告。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院主計處(2010)。98年家庭收支調査報告。台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.Deaton, Angus、Zaidi, Salman(2002)。Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis。Washington, DC。  new window
圖書
1.Li, He(2000)。Political Economy of Income Distribution:A Comparative Study of Taiwan and Mexico。Policy Studies Journal。  new window
2.于宗先、王金利(20090000)。臺灣人口變動與經濟發展。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李瑞中(2009)。2020年的人口社會結構預測報告。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.Brewer, Mike、Goodman, Alissa、Leicester, Andrew.(2006)。Household Spending in Britan. What Can It Teach Us about Poverty。Bristol, UK。  new window
5.Friedman, Milton.(1957)。A Theory of Consumption Function。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
6.Fei, John C. H.、Rains, Gustav、Kuo, Shirley W. Y.(1979)。Growth and Equity: The Taiwan Case。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Crossley, Thomas F.、Pendakur, Krishna(2006)。Consumption Inequality in Can-ada。Dimensions of In-equality in Canada。Vancouver, Canada。  new window
8.Johnson, David、Shipp, Stephanie.(1995)。Trends in Inequality Using Consumer Expenditures: 1960 to 1993。Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods。  new window
其他
1.中華民國統計資訊網(專業人士)(2009)。社會指標-人口統計表,http://www.stat.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=538&CtUnit=375&BaseDSD=7, 20090408。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪明皇,陳昭榮,葉炫偵(2009)。台灣的新貧現象與消費不均度 $a1997-2007,台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院主計處(2008)。社會指標統計年報2007,台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.(2006)。Impacts of Poli-cies on Poverty: The Definition of Poverty,http://www.fao.org/tc/easypol/out-put/search_by_topics.asp, 20070903。  new window
5.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.(2006)。Equivalence Sca-le: Subjective Methods,http://www.fao.org/tc/easypol/output/search_by_top-ics.asp, 20070903。  new window
6.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.(2006)。Policy Impacts on Inequality: Decomposition of Income Inequality by Income Sources,http://www.fao.org/tc/easypol/output/search_by_topics.asp, 20070903。  new window
圖書論文
1.Modigliani, Franco、Brumberg, R.(1954)。Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-section Data。Post Keynesian Economics。New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE