:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:科技設備監控運用於我國社區處遇可行性評述
書刊名:犯罪與刑事司法研究
作者:鄭添成
作者(外文):Cheng, Victor T. C.
出版日期:2005
卷期:4
頁次:頁167-207
主題關鍵詞:科技設備監控中間刑罰制裁措施觀護法可行性評估社區處遇Electronic monitoringIntermediate sanctionProbation codeFeasibility evaluationCommunity correction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:53
科技設備監控屬於刑罰「中間制裁措施」由於具有合理的價格(成本)、可反轉性、可區分性、與現存的矯治方案與機構目標甚為相容等因素,而逐漸受到國外刑事司法制度的青睞,成為近年來相當熱門的犯罪控制策略之一。本文從國外現行方案經驗,探討科技設備監控預防累、再犯之目標是否容易幸成,繼而檢視我國現有環境對累、再犯之受保護管束人所提供之監督、輔導與其實施情形,進而從中反映出國內未來運用科技設備監控在執行上應興革事項。 本文主要採取之研究方法為「文獻探討法」及「比較研究法」,藉由蒐集國外具實施科技設備監控經驗國家之方案評估研究及相關文獻,來進行彙整分析比較,並將科技設備監控相關問題以不同的面向來進行可行性評估論述。本文評述架構包括:(一)立法例及法令規定方面;(二)適用對象及使用範圍方面;包括科技設備監控適用於毒品犯尿液受驗人、家庭暴力及性侵害犯罪加害人、暴力犯罪受保護管束人之可行性,以及適用於其他犯罪類型之選擇標準等;(三)成本效益分析及財務分析方面;及(四)使用者主觀感受方面。 評估研究結果發現:科技設備監控是具備可行性的。監控基間不能太長,大多數研究認為60至90天的長度是最有效的,一旦監控時間超過3個月,受監控者的順從度即會急遽下降。此外,科技設備監控被證實可有效作為一種傳統監禁刑的替代刑。而使用者主觀評述在各國間也普遍獲致支持,並有平均約8成的高滿意度。 適用對象評述方面,以科技設備監控來提升毒品犯到驗率是可行的,如以科技設備監控作為附屬配套措施,並結合以長期戒癮處遇計畫為主的組合方案則被證實極具成效。暴力犯罪方面,科技設備監控與傳統保護管束之間,在成效上並未出現顯著差異。家庭暴力案件方面,科技設備監控的確會改善加害人與被害人之間的互動狀況,然而所可能造成的心理作用以及緊張關係的影響則仍曖昧未明。性侵害犯罪方面,以科技設備監控結合現行身心治療與輔導教育制度是目前所知較佳的處遇方式,可有效提升到院治療率並防止接近可能的被害人而達到防止再犯的效果。
The Electronic Monitoring (EM) is a kind of intermediate sanctions in the criminal justice system. It is popular and to be one of the current crime control strategies with the characteristics of reasonable prices, reversibility, divisibility, and compatible with the goal of contemporary correction policy. Today, there are at least 15 countries introduced the EM program in the criminal justice system in the world. The interaction and integration between technology (e.g. EM) and criminal justice is ongoing. Some innovated EM legalisms included in a legislative bill named “Probation Code” in Taiwan recently. The spirits of these EM legalisms is to improve the community security, and the applicative targets will be the offenders with serious criminal offense, high recidivist rate, and high risk to danger the community. The EM is an innovated program in the criminal justice system in Taiwan, and there are no related experiments or studies of the topic. The aim of the study is to analyze the feasibility of EM program in Taiwan from perspective. By using literature review and collective comparison, the practical experiences, effects and evaluation researches of EM program of other countries were collected and analyzed. The perspectives of this study including: (1) the EM definition and kinds of devices; (2) the EM laws and legislation; (3) the EM applicative targets; (4) the cost-benefit and financial analysis; and (5) the opinions of the EM program related public. The EM applicative targets were divided and discussed by the types of offense, which including the drug abuser, domestic violence offender, sex offender, violent offender, and other unclassified offenders.
期刊論文
1.楊士隆、鄭添成、陳英明(20030500)。性犯罪者之處遇與矯治制度。月旦法學雜誌,96,110-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Reichel, P. L.(1997)。Corrections: Philosophy, Practices, and Procedures。St. Paul, MN:West Publishing Company。  new window
其他
1.九福科技顧問有限公司(2004)。  延伸查詢new window
2.司法院(2001)。家暴案件加害人交保或飭回時,法院宜以電話傳真通知警察機關。  延伸查詢new window
3.內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會(2005)。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院主計處(2004)。  延伸查詢new window
5.李光輝(2005)。電子監控性侵害假釋犯可避免再犯罪。  延伸查詢new window
6.法務部(2004)。中華民國九十三年度法務行政一年。  延伸查詢new window
7.法務部(2004a)。犯罪狀況及其分析92年。  延伸查詢new window
8.法務部(2005)。法務部法務統計指標。  延伸查詢new window
9.法務部統計處(2004)。中華民國九十二年度法務統計年報。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃徵男(2004)。新加坡刑罰、獄政與青少年犯罪防治策略。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊士隆、林健陽(1997)。監獄受刑人擁擠之問題與對策。  延伸查詢new window
12.楊士隆、鄭瑞隆(2004)。台灣地區民眾對政府防治犯罪滿意度暨民眾被害之調查研究。  延伸查詢new window
13.魏士凱(2004)。電子監控之理論與實務。  延伸查詢new window
14.Boelens, R., U. Jonsson and D. Whitfield(2004)。Electronic Monitoring in Europe。  new window
15.Bonta, J., C. S. Wallace and J. Rooney(2000)。Can Electronic Monitoring Make a Differences? An Evaluation of Three Canadian Programs。  new window
16.Burke, P., L. Adams and N. Becki(1990)。Policy for Parole Release and Revocation。  new window
17.Crowe, A.H(2002)。Offender supervision with electronic technology。  new window
18.Dodgson, K., P. Goodwin, P. Howard and T. S. Llewellyn et al(2001)。Electronic monitoring of released prisoners: an evaluation of the Home Detention Curfew scheme。  new window
19.Finn, M.A. and S. S. Muirhead(2002)。The Effectiveness of Electronic Monitoring with Violent Male Parolees。  new window
20.Fong, T.(2003)。To keep one person in jail: a day。  new window
21.Haverkamp, R.(2001)。Attitudes towards Electronic Monitoring in Sweden and Lower Saxony/Germany。  new window
22.Mayer, M.(2004)。Evaluation of a Pilot Project in Electronic Monitoring。  new window
23.Nation Law Enforcement and Correction Technology Center(1999)。Keeping Track of Electronic Monitoring。  new window
24.SANA.(2004)。Singapore Anti-Narcotics Association。  new window
25.Snow, P.(1999)。Electronic Monitoring od Offenders。  new window
26.(2004)。英國BBC民調。  延伸查詢new window
27.(2004)。英國內政部官方網站。  延伸查詢new window
28.(2004)。英國內政部觀護處官方網站。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top