:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國家人權機構作為違憲審查的替代方案?
書刊名:法政學報
作者:楊智傑 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Chih-chieh
出版日期:2005
卷期:19
頁次:頁173-202
主題關鍵詞:國家人權機構違憲審查人權委員會監察院National human rights institutionJudicial reviewHuman rights commissionOmbudsman
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:16
本文乃欲研究國家人權機構作為違憲審查替代方案的可能性。首先本文先簡單釐清人權委員會與監察院定位之爭,提出另一觀點,認為可以將兩機構合併。以做為目前權限爭議的解決之道。接著則繼續比較人權委員會與違憲審查兩者在維護人權上的功能,本文認為,在人權保障的功能上,違憲審查的效果比仌權委員會差,卻要耗費比較多的資源成本,故本文大膽建議以人權委員會作為違憲審查的替代方案。
I want research the possibility that national human rights institutions replace of judicial review. First part of this article, I try to explain the difference and the sameness of human rights commission and the ombudsman, and offer the alternative solution to figure out the power-conflict problem between the two institutions. Second part of this article, I try to analysis the functions of judicial review and human rights commission. I propose that the human rights protection function of judicial review is less than of human rights commission, but the cost of judicial review is more than of human rights commission.
期刊論文
1.張文貞(20041200)。新世紀臺灣憲改的制度選擇--論監察院、考試院與國民大會的存廢。月旦法學,115,209-225。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇友辰(20021200)。論國家人權委員會的角色與地位。國家政策季刊,1(2),1-32。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊智傑(2003)。評蘇永欽教授《走入新世紀的憲政主義》。台灣本土法學,44,237-244。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hertogh, Marc(1998)。The Policy Impact of the Ombudsman and the Administrative Courts: A Heuristic Model。INT'L OMBUDSMAN Y.B.,2,63。  new window
5.Hertogh, Marc、Oosting, Marten(1996)。Introduction: The Ombudsman and the Quality of Government。EUR. Y.B. COMP. GOV'T & PUB. ADMIN.,3,259。  new window
6.Gannett, Jennifer(2003)。Providing Guardianship of Fundamental Rights and Essential Government Oversight: An Examination and Comparative Analysis of the Role of Ombudsman in Sweden and Poland。New Eng. J. Int'l & Comp. L.,9,519。  new window
7.Sarkin, Jeremy(1998)。The Development of a Human Rights Culture in South Africa。Human Rights Qua.,20,629。  new window
8.魏千峰(20001200)。南非新憲法下之人權保障。思與言,38(4),117-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Hucker, John(1997)。Antidiscrimination Laws in Canada: Human Rights Commisions and Search for Equality。Human Rights Quarterly,19,564-566。  new window
10.Weinrib, Lorraine Eisenstat(1999)。Canada's Constitutional Revolution: from Legislative to Constitutional State。Isr. L. Rev.,33,13。  new window
11.張志明(20020700)。由美國聯邦最高法院與德國聯邦憲法法院墮胎判決論國家義務之不同觀點--憲法權利之消極性與積極性。憲政時代,28(1),110-130。  延伸查詢new window
12.葉俊榮(20020900)。行政院組織改造的目標、原則及推動機制。國家政策季刊,1,1-22。  延伸查詢new window
13.Reif, Linda C.(2000)。Building Democratic Institutions: The Role of national Human Rights Institutions in Good Governance and Human Rights Protection。Harvard Human Rights Journal,13。  new window
14.洪家殷、蘇永欽(19940700)。從監察院之地位,論監察權對司法權行使之界限--以彈劾權行使之原因為對象。憲政時代,20(1),20-40。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.廖福特(2003)。聯合國對國家人權委員會之推動與實踐。人權的歷史與理論學術研討會,政治大學歷史學系、國史館及國家人權紀念館籌備處舉辦 (會議日期: 2003/12/06-12/07),8-11。  延伸查詢new window
2.湯德宗(2003)。論違憲審查制度之改進。第四屆憲法解釋之理論與實務研討會,中研院社科所主辦 (會議日期: 2003年9月27日),34-36。  延伸查詢new window
3.任冀平、謝秉憲(199912)。政治或司法:我國違憲審查權定位之研究。《跨世紀的政治願景》學術研討會,東海大學政治學系主辦 (會議日期: 1999年12月)。台中:東海大學政治學系。23-24。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.楊智傑(200306)。反違憲審查之研究--分析美國批判違憲審查論述與運用(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.高忠義(2003)。落空的期待。商周。  延伸查詢new window
2.Rosenberg, G. N.(1991)。The hollow hope。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.Lane, Jan-Erik、Ersson, Svante、何景榮(2002)。新制度主義政治學。韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.楊智傑(20030605)。大法官有這麼偉大嗎?。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Hadden, Tom(2000)。The Role of a National Commission in the Protection of Human Rights。Human Rights Commissions and Ombudsman Offices。Kluwer Law International。  new window
2.Hossain, Kamal(2000)。[Human Rights Commissions and Ombudsman Offices] Introduction。Human Rights Commissions and Ombudsman Offices。Kluwer Law International。  new window
3.Stjernquis, Nils(1992)。Judicial Review and the Rule of Law: Comparing the United States and Sweden。Compatative Judical Review and Public Policy。  new window
4.Buss, William G.(1999)。A Comparative Study of the Constitutional Protection of Hate Speech in Canada and the United States: A Search for Explanations。Constitutional Dialogues in Comparative Perspective。  new window
5.Burdekin, Brain(2000)。Human Rights Commissions。Human Rights Commissions and Ombudsman Offices。Kluwer Law International。  new window
6.Besselink, Leonard F. M.(2000)。Types of National Institutions for Protection of Human Rights and Ombudsman Institutions: An Overview of Legal and Institutional Issues。Human Rights Commissions and Ombudsman Offices。Kluwer Law International。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top