:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:基因轉殖植物的智慧財產權保護
書刊名:清華科技法律與政策論叢
作者:謝銘洋 引用關係宋皇志 引用關係
作者(外文):Shieh, Ming-yanSung, Huang-chih
出版日期:2004
卷期:1:1
頁次:頁165-190
主題關鍵詞:智慧財產權基因轉殖植物專利法品種法農民留種除外生沕資源之來源Intellectual propertyGene-modified plantsPatent lawPlant variety lawFarmers' privilegeGenetic resource
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:36
我國應否開放以基因轉殖植物為主要保護對象之植物專利,本文認為有再三斟酌之必要。本文建議在審查基因轉殖植物之相關發明時應將其是否違反道德或公序良俗納入考量。至於農民留種除外的議題,本文主張我國應該採取肯定的態度,一旦我國將來決定要開放植物專利,應該同時將農民留種除外條款同時納入專利法以做為配套措施。至於基因轉殖植物之專利申請是否應該揭露生物資源之來源,國際上普遍持肯定態度,但是否做為專利要件則爭議性甚大,猶有進一步研究之必要。
More consideration is needed to determine whether to protect plant varieties, most of which are gene-modified plants, by the patent law in Taiwan. This article suggests that the issues of moral and public order need to be considered while examining the patent applications relating to gene-modified plants. This article also suggests that the farmers' privilege should be implemented into the patent law to harmony with the patent protection of plant varieties, if plant varieties will be patentable in the future. Regarding the issue whether to disclose the genetic resource going along with the patent applications, it is well accepted by lots of countries. However, the argument is still very violent concerning whether the disclosure of genetic resource should be one element of patentability.
期刊論文
1.Whitaker, Damon J.(2002)。The Patentability of Embryonic Stem Cell Research Results。U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y,13,361。  new window
2.Ohlgart, Samantha M.(2002)。The Terminator Gene: Intellectual Property Rights vs. The Farmers' Common Law Right to Save Seed。Drake J. Agric. L.,7,473。  new window
3.van Overwalle, Geertrui(1999)。Patent Protection for Plants: A Comparison of American and European Approaches。J. L. & TECH.,39,143。  new window
4.Dastgheib-Vinarov, Sara(2000)。Comment: a Higher Nonobviousness Standard for Gene Patents: Protecting Biomedical Research from the Big Chill。Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review,4。  new window
5.Gitter, Donna M.(2001)。Led Astray by the Moral Compass: Incorporating Morality into European Union Biotechnology Patent Law。Berkeley Journal of International Law,19,1。  new window
6.張仁平(20010200)。臺灣生物技術專利保護之回顧與前瞻。萬國法律,115,80-88。  延伸查詢new window
7.Cantor, A. E.(2000)。Using the Written Description and Enablement Requirements to Limit Biotechnology Patents。Harvard Journal of Law and Technology,14,267。  new window
圖書
1.Correa, Carlos M.(2000)。Intellectual Property Rights, the WTO and Developing Countries。Zed Books Ltd。  new window
2.Gervais, Daniel J.(1998)。The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting History and Analysis。London:Sweet & Maxwell。  new window
其他
1.Background and the current situation on Article 27.3(b), traditional knowledge and biodiversity,http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/art27_3b_background_e.htm。  new window
2.智慧財產局九十三年工作計畫大綱,http://www.tipo,gov,tw/service/about/about_us/93年工作計畫大綱.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE