:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中國「資訊作戰」的類型分析
書刊名:遠景基金會季刊
作者:呂爾浩魏澤民
作者(外文):Lu, Erh-haoWei, Tse-min
出版日期:2006
卷期:7:3
頁次:頁187-229
主題關鍵詞:中國資訊作戰資訊戰常規資訊戰非常規資訊戰資訊作戰類型分析ChinaInformation operationInformation warfareConventional information warfareUnconventional information warfareTypological analysis of information operation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:30
自20世紀90年代末期以降,中國成為東亞新興強權,而有所謂「中國威脅論」論調產生,其中「資訊戰」和「資訊作戰」能力是評估共軍軍事力量的重要因素。因此,本文旨在對「資訊戰」和「資訊作戰」進行系統化認識,作為了解中國「資訊戰」和「資訊作戰」能力的知識基礎。經過文獻分析,本文認為「資訊作戰」可區分為「常規/非常規」、「攻擊/防衛」兩組概念,這兩組概念交織成「攻擊常規資訊作戰」、「防衛常規資訊作戰」、「攻擊非常規資訊作戰」和「防衛非常規資訊作戰」等四種「類型學」。本文以此作為理論分析架構,並據以檢視共軍發展「資訊作戰」的思維。本文研究發現,經由上述類型分析,「攻擊常規資訊作戰」、「防衛非常規資訊作戰」由於累積相當多先進國家政府與軍隊的實際經驗,因而受到中國官方的實際支持;而「防衛常規資訊作戰」和「攻擊非常規資訊作戰」則僅具高度實驗性,故其理論意義遠大於實質意義。
China has become the new power in East Asia after the 90s of 20th century. A so-called “The China Threat” hence occurred. The most important forces of People’s Liberation Army are “Information Warfare” and “Information Operation.” But governmental and scholarly communities in every country do not have a common formula for this phenomenal interpretation. Upon the quest, this article intends to acquaint with “Information Warfare” and “Information Operation” for having the fundamental understanding of the two forces. Through documental analysis, this article figures out that “Information Warfare” can be included in “Information Operation.” “Information Operation” could be split into two sets of concepts: “Conventional/Unconventional” and “Attacking/Offensive." The theory of this thesis is constructed of these two sets concepts which interwoven into four “types”: “Attacking Conventional Information Operation,” “Offensive Conventional Information Operation,” “Attacking Unconventional Information Operation” and “Offensive Unconventional Information Operation.” Within the theoretical structure, this article examines how People's Liberation Army develops “Information Operation” ideology. The research discovers the following results: “Attacking Conventional Information Operation” and “Offensive Unconventional Information Operation” do really be supported by China’s government through typological analysis because the two types accumulate many experiences from progressed nations’ government and army. However, “Offensive Conventional Information Operation” and “Attacking Un­conventional Information Operation” are highly experimental. Their theoretical meaning exists highly above the actual meaning.
期刊論文
1.Arquilla, John、Ronfeldt, David(1993)。Cyberwar Is Coming!。Comparative Strategy,12(2),141-165。  new window
2.寇健文(20010300)。中共對網路資訊傳播的政治控制。問題與研究,40(2),33-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.劉鴻基(1998)。試論有中國特色的新軍事革命。国防大学学报,104,62-65。  延伸查詢new window
4.王保存(2003)。直面軍事變革-競逐信息戰「高地」。瞭望周刊。  延伸查詢new window
5.毛江華、胡英(2003)。中國信息安全元年。计算机世界报,41。  延伸查詢new window
6.鍾卓新(2002)。「911」之後的美國資訊安全措施。计算机安全,9。  延伸查詢new window
7.Hebert, Adam J.(2001)。Smaller Bombs for Stealthy Aircraft。Air Force Magazine,84(7),42-44。  new window
8.Rhea, John(2001)。Asymmetric Warfare。Military & Aerospace Electronics,12(1),6-9。  new window
9.Thelen, Kathleen(1999)。Historical Institutional in Comparative Politics。Annual Review of Political Science,2,369-404。  new window
10.Thomas, Timothy L.(2001)。China's Electronic Strategies。Military Review,81(3),32-54。  new window
11.Thomas, Timothy L.(2001)。Deciphering as Asymmetry's World Game。Military Review,81(4),32-38。  new window
12.Whitehead, Yu-Lin G.(1997)。Information as a Weapon Reality versus Promises。Aerospace Power Journal,11(3),40-54。  new window
會議論文
1.Doty, T.(1997)。Internet Security: Vulnerabilities, Threats and Mitigation。0。  new window
學位論文
1.曹邦全(2001)。中共信息戰之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.沈大偉、國防部(2004)。現代化中共軍力進展、問題與前景。現代化中共軍力進展、問題與前景。臺北:國防部史政編譯室。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hundley, Richard O.(1999)。Past Revolutions, Future Transformations: What can the History of Revolutions in Military Affairs Tell Us about Transforming the U. S. Military?。Santa Monica, CA:Rand。  new window
3.Libicki, Martin C.(1995)。What Is Information Warfare?。What Is Information Warfare?。Washington, DC:Center for Advanced Concepts and Technology/ Institute for National Strategic Studies/ National Defense University。  new window
4.沈偉光(1997)。新戰爭論。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.喬良、王湘穗(1999)。超限戰:兩個空軍大校對全球化時代戰爭與戰法的想定。北京:解放軍文藝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.U.S. Department of Defense(2004)。Annual report on the military power of the People's Republic of China。Washington, D.C.。  new window
7.林中斌(1999)。核霸:透視跨世紀中共戰略武力。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.U.S. Department of Defense(1998)。Joint Publication 3-13: Joint Doctrine for Information Operations。Washington, DC:Joint Chiefs of Staff Publication。  new window
9.平可夫(1995)。僵局:兩岸情事。台北:新新聞文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.Pillsbury, Michael(2000)。China Debates the Future Security Environment。Washington, D.C.:National Defense University Press。  new window
11.Peters, B. Guy(1998)。Comparative Politics: Theory and Methods。New York:New York University Press。  new window
12.Toffler, Alvin、Toffler, Heidi、傅凌(1994)。新戰爭論。臺北:時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.(2000)。國家信息安全報告。國家信息安全報告。北京。  延伸查詢new window
14.Molander, R. C.(2000)。戰略性資訊作戰的崛起。戰略性資訊作戰的崛起。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.王保存(2003)。世界新軍事革命新論。世界新軍事革命新論。北京。  延伸查詢new window
16.王普豐(1995)。信息戰爭與信息革命。信息戰爭與信息革命。北京。  延伸查詢new window
17.毛澤東(1976)。毛澤東選集,第2卷。毛澤東選集,第2卷。北京。  延伸查詢new window
18.李英明(2000)。中國發展高科技「信息戰」及對我國建立安全稽核制度影響之研究。中國發展高科技「信息戰」及對我國建立安全稽核制度影響之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.周榮庭(2002)。信息國防論。北京:軍事科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.沈偉光(1990)。新戰爭論。新戰爭論。杭州。  延伸查詢new window
21.沈偉光(2004)。解密信息安全。解密信息安全。北京。  延伸查詢new window
22.張召忠(2004)。打贏信息化戰爭。打贏信息化戰爭。北京。  延伸查詢new window
23.張新華(2004)。信息安全:威嚇與戰略。信息安全:威嚇與戰略。上海。  延伸查詢new window
24.Burles, Mark、Shulsky, Abram(2000)。中國動武方式。中國動武方式。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
25.Cole, Bernard、Godwin, Paul(2000)。二十一世紀臺海兩岸軍隊。二十一世紀臺海兩岸軍隊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
26.Magsig, Daniel E.(1997)。資訊作戰譯文彙集,I。資訊作戰譯文彙集,I。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
27.The Wihte House(2003)。確保安全網路空間的國家戰略。確保安全網路空間的國家戰略。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
28.Waltz, Edward(2004)。信息戰原理與實踐。信息戰原理與實踐。北京。  延伸查詢new window
29.周碧松、於巧華(1999)。新軍事革命的基本目標。中共「新軍事革命問題專輯」。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
30.解大軍(1999)。淺談知識經濟及其對軍事革命的影響與挑戰。中共「新軍事革命問題專輯」。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
31.樓海強(1997)。威懾理論與理論威懾。共軍「信息戰」研究專輯。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
32.Alberts, Richard、Hayes, E.(2003)。Power to the Edge: Command and Control in the Information Age。Power to the Edge: Command and Control in the Information Age。Washington, DC。  new window
33.Army Training and Doctrine(2003)。Transforming the Arm TRADOC's First Thirty Years 1973-2003。Transforming the Arm TRADOC's First Thirty Years 1973-2003。Virginia, USA。  new window
34.Department of Homeland Security(2005)。Evaluation of DHS' Information Security Program for Fiscal Year 2005。Evaluation of DHS' Information Security Program for Fiscal Year 2005。Washington, DC。  new window
35.Director for Strategic Plans and Policy, J5 Strategy Division(2000)。Joint Vision 2020。Joint Vision 2020。Washington, DC。  new window
36.Harknett, Richard J.(1996)。Information Warfare and Defense。Information Warfare and Defense。0。  new window
37.(1996)。Strategic Information Warfare: A New Face of War。Strategic Information Warfare: A New Face of War。Santa Monica, CA。  new window
38.Miler, John(1996)。Information Warfare: Issues and Perceptions。Sun Tzu Art of War in Information Warfare。Washington, DC。  new window
其他
1.王普豐(2003)。現代資訊戰研究中若干問題之我見,0。  延伸查詢new window
2.石寶華(2000)。伊拉克戰爭引發的思考:加強信息化條件人民戰爭戰法研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
3.何佩琪(2004)。國土安全計劃帶來的資安效應,0。  延伸查詢new window
4.何德全,吳世忠(2001)。2000年國內外信息安全概況,0。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bajkowski, Julian(2004)。Big Brother IT Budget,0。  new window
6.Cox, Christopher(1999)。Report of the Select Committee on U.S. Natural Security and Military/Commercial Concerts with PRC,0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Mulvenon, James(1999)。The PLA and Information Warfare。The People's Liberation Army in the Information Age。Santa Monica, CA:RAND。  new window
2.Arquilla, John、Ronfeldt, David(2001)。The Advent of Netwar。Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime and Militancy。Rand。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top