:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論建立資訊時代「公共領域」之重要性及具體建議
書刊名:國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者:劉孔中 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Kung-chung
出版日期:2006
卷期:35:6
頁次:頁1-35
主題關鍵詞:公共領域重製權補償金制度智慧財產權著作權著作法專利權專利法商標權商標法合理使用TRIPS協定政府資訊公開法伯恩公約Public domainCopyright substitution leviesIntellectual property rightsCopyrightPatentTrademarkFair useTRIPs agreementBerne conventionFree culture
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(3) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:83
在資訊時代,非實體面向的公共領域面臨嚴重流失的問題,因此本文的主旨在於闡述非建立實體面向公共領域的重要性,並提出建立與維護該領域之具體建議,包括:1、在憲法層次理應建立一個由所有人享有、可提供所有人集體自由的公共領域,使之成為憲法保障的法律概念及法律制度,用以平衡私益與公益。每當國家在順從少數人私益而承認新的智慧財產權時,就有義務從維護公共領域的角度探討如何使公共領域不受到該智慧財產權的不利影響,從而採取措施防止之。2、以某種形式的重製權補償金制度維護公共領域,即在既有的各種著作權外,再增加著作權人一項收入,使著作權人能從原本無法實現其權利(限於事實上及法律上困難-隱私權)的家中重製行為中獲到補償。補償的機制是透過著作權共同管理團體運作,所有費用最後都是由消費者承擔,只不過其支出被化整為零分散到各種行為之中。消費者支付補償金之後,其個人非營利之重製行為,完全不受著作權人重製權的限制。3、廢除非營利目的非法重製之刑事責任。4、建構取得資訊的良好法制環境。5、國家應將其掌握之資源多投入公共領域,釋出國有的著作權,要求公立教學及研究機構及人員應將其研究成果提供或將取得資料限期公開。
The information era is paradoxically facing the danger of an ever-shrinking public domain, which is vital to the creation, accumulation, dissemination and enjoyment of works and the furtherance of mankind. This paper endeavors to stress the importance of maintaining public domain and to envision concrete suggestions to its success. It comes up with the following: 1. To conceptualize and institutionalize public domain at the level of Constitution, so as to strike a fine balance between public and private interest. Whenever private copyright gets expanded, public interest shall be counter-balanced by taking into consideration of the need of a healthy public domain. 2. To introduce copyright substitution levies as an extra source of income for copyright holders as premises for legalizing private reproductions, which are anyway beyond the reach of law. 3. To abolish criminal penalty for private and non-commercial reproductions. 4. To create a legal environment that is conducive to the acquirement of information. 5. To release works owned by public sector into public domain via Creative Common mechanism.
期刊論文
1.Lange, David(1981)。Recognizing the Public Domain。Law and Contemporary Problems,44(4),147-178。  new window
2.陳家駿(20051200)。從臺北地院KURO案刑事判決談P2P網站著作權爭議。全國律師,9(12),21-33。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉孔中(20051200)。從著作權共同管理之發展趨勢檢討我國著作權共同管理團體之法制。全國律師,9(12),4-20。  延伸查詢new window
4.呂佩芳、楊智傑(2005)。「釋放部份著作權」之法律經濟分析。智慧財產權,81,96-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳洸嶽(2004)。非對等當事人間之資訊提供義務的確立。律師雜誌,293,41-50。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉孔中(2002)。論商標部分審查制度及其在我國之採行。月旦法學,90,140-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.劉孔中(2005)。著作權法有關技術保護措施之研究-歐盟及德國之借鏡。月旦法學,119,70-90。  延伸查詢new window
8.Benkler, Yochai(2003)。Through the Looking Glass: Alice and the Constitutional Foundations of the Public Domain。Law and Contemporary Problems,66(1/ 2),173-224。  new window
9.Kur, Annette(2004)。A New Framework for Intellectual Property Rights - Horizontal Issues。International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law,35,6-6。  new window
10.Lange, David(2003)。The Public Domain: Rethinking the Public Domain。Law and Contemporary Problems,66,473-473。  new window
11.Lessing, Lawrence(2005)。The Public Domain - Here Today, Gone Tomorrow。Foreign Policy。  new window
12.劉孔中(2005)。Of the Latest and Future Taiwanese IP Pilgrimage After Acceding Into the WTO。清華科技法律與政策論叢,2(3),5-44。  new window
13.Nimmer, David(2003)。"Fairest of Them All" and Other Fairy Tales of Fair Use。Law and Contemporary Problems,66,263-287。  new window
14.Sun, Haochen(2005)。Copyright Under Siege: An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Copyright Protection in the context of Global Digital Divide。International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law,35,192-192。  new window
圖書
1.Lessig, Lawrence(2004)。Free Culture, How Big Media Uses Technology and Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity。Free Culture, How Big Media Uses Technology and Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity。New York:Penguin Press。  new window
2.Fisher, William W. III(2004)。Promises to Keep: Technology, Law, and the Future of Entertainment。Stanford University Press。  new window
3.Bodenhausen, Georg H. C.(1991)。Guide to the Application of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property as Revised at Stockholm in 1967。WIPO。  new window
4.Vaidhyanathan, Siva(2001)。Copyrights and copywrongs: The rise of intellectual property and how it threatens creativity。New York, NY:New York University Press。  new window
5.Cornish, William(2004)。Intellectual Property - Omnipresent, Distracting, Irrelevant。Intellectual Property - Omnipresent, Distracting, Irrelevant。Oxford。  new window
6.McCarthy, Thomas(1996)。Thomas McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition。St. Paul, MN:West Group。  new window
7.Schmid、Wirth(2004)。Urheberrechtsgesetz。Urheberrechtsgesetz。0。  new window
8.World Intellectual Property Organization(1978)。Guide to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works。Guide to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works。0。  new window
其他
1.Machlup, Fritz(1958)。An Economic Review of Patent System,0。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE