:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小兒童讀經教學之個案研究--以福智教育園區國小二年級為例
書刊名:慈濟大學人文社會科學學刊
作者:彭妮絲 引用關係
作者(外文):Peng, Ni-Se
出版日期:2006
卷期:5
頁次:頁111-145
主題關鍵詞:文化典範兒童讀經基模善行實踐德育Cultural paradigmChildren's classic-readingSchemaCharity practiceMoral education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:14
經典閱讀向來為傳統中國蒙學教育的一環,欲透過經典令童子學習先人的智慧並涵養道德。然而就在一些人致力推廣讀經之際,也有諸如「欲速則不達」、「揠苗助長」、「推擠其他書籍的閱讀」等不同的聲音:本研究即欲探討以讀經為正式課程的教學實施狀況、兒童初習讀經的態度及其成效,藉以澄清或證實上述的質疑。本研究對象為福智教育園區國小部二年級生,透過觀察、訪談及文獻蒐集與分析,呈現實施兒童讀經班級的教師之教學信念,以及學生的學習、閱讀實景,結論並顯示讀經教育可提升他學科的學習。此外並就兒童讀經教育應如何開展等相關議題,提出兒童讀經活動可行之實施策略,以作為未來相關機構辦理讀經方案之參考。
Reading the classics has been an essential part of the children's education in Chinese tradition. They would like children to read the classics and thereby learn the wisdoms from the ancients and cultivate their moral sense. However, while some people have been doing their best to spread this idea, there are also some criticisms on it, such as 'haste brings no success', 'being overenthusiastic will do harm to it', and 'the other necessary readings will be crowded out', etc. The purpose of this study was to explore the elementary school in which the classic-reading was regarded as a core course. We examined (1) the teaching and learning practice and (2) the attitudes of children who are beginners to the classic-reading. The consequences of this educational project and achievements of these children were the living evidence to close this debate. We took the second-year pupils at the Elementary School in Fu Chih Education Park as a case study. Based on observations, interviews, and literature reviews, the ideas of teachers of these classes and the real picture of students' learning activities, we knew that such educational project would facilitate students' learning of other subjects. Besides, the issue of how to develop children's classic-reading education was discussed and we also provided some useful strategies for other institutions which would propose the same project in the future.
期刊論文
1.王財貴(1998)。一日一書運動--「讀經」姊妹篇。讀經通訊,12,版1。  延伸查詢new window
2.王財貴(2001)。英語英文讀經教育之基本理論。讀經通訊,25。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱淳良(1994)。儒家倫理思想與三字經的道德教育。高等師範教育研究,5,77-78。  延伸查詢new window
4.福智之友編輯室(2003)。打造我們的家。福智之友,143。  延伸查詢new window
5.Rupley, W. H.、Logan, J. W.、Nichols, W. D.(1998)。Vocabulary instruction in a balanced reading program。The Reading Teacher,52(4),336-346。  new window
6.王財貴(19950600)。國小施行「讀經」教育之理論、實務、及疑難之解答。國教輔導,34(5)=307,12-23。  延伸查詢new window
7.蘇麗娟(19960600)。兒童讀經之推行與研究。國教輔導,35(5)=313,27-31。  延伸查詢new window
8.王財貴(20010900)。小學讀經教學之基本理念及施教方案。文教新潮,6(3),15-20。  延伸查詢new window
9.李威熊(19830200)。經學精神的重振。孔孟月刊,21(6),63-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.吳世雄(19980900)。論認知心理學的記憶原理對漢字教學的啟迪。華文世界,89,46-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.彭妮絲(20040700)。朱熹童蒙教育思想研究。環球技術學院學報,4,25-35。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.王財貴(1999)。臺灣的讀經運動--讀經推展的現況與展望。全國兒童讀經教師研習會。文化復興運動總會臺灣省分會。  延伸查詢new window
2.林登順(1999)。試論國小課程中之讀經教育。第二屆台灣儒學研究國際學術研討會。台南:國立成功大學。681-696。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.胡志偉、顏乃欣(1992)。閱讀中文的心理歷程:80年代研究的回顧與展望。台北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.周淑惠(1999)。一位國小教師國語科教學信念之研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳敏惠(2002)。兒童讀經實施策略之研究--以福智文教基金會為例(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東縣。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊旻芳(2001)。五位兒童讀經教師之教學信念(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.張樹枝(2001)。國民小學兒童讀經教學成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.柯欣雅(2002)。近十年台灣兒童讀經教育的發展﹝1991-2001﹞(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳美錦(1991)。反孔廢經運動之興起(1894∼1937)(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
7.王怡方(1999)。兒童讀經之態度、教學過程與成效之研究--以台中縣三所小學為例(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.福智文教基金會(1998)。落實國民小學德育教學推廣計畫教師手冊。臺北:圓音。  延伸查詢new window
2.福智文教基金會(1999)。福智文教基金會簡介。臺北:福智。  延伸查詢new window
3.福智文教基金會(2000)。福智教育園區簡介。臺北:福智。  延伸查詢new window
4.翟本瑞(1999)。兒童讀經運動的教育學反省意義。臺北:行政院國科會。  延伸查詢new window
5.釋日常(1999)。爲什麼要落實德育教學--杏壇飄香。台北:福智之聲。  延伸查詢new window
6.Mann, L.、Sabatino, D. A.、黃慧真(1994)。認知過程的原理:補救與特殊教育上的運用。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.王財貴(1995)。兒童讀經教育說明手冊。臺中:國立台中師範學院語文教學研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
8.Bogdan, Robert C.、Biklen, Sari K.(1992)。Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
9.張春興、林清山(1983)。教育心理學。台北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.王文科(2000)。質的研究的問題與趨勢。質的研究方法。高雄:麗文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Rumeihart, D. E.、Norman, D. A.(1978)。Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three modes of learning。Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Rumelhart, David E.(1980)。Schemata: The building blocks of cognition。Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognition psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence and education。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.Rumelhart, David E.、Ortony, Andrew(1977)。The representation of knowledge in memory。Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top