:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論我國監察權的演變與未來發展方向
書刊名:國家發展研究
作者:吳秀玲 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Hsiu-ling
出版日期:2006
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁29-66
主題關鍵詞:監察院監察權彈劾調查國會監察行政監察監察使The Control YuanControl powerImpeachmentInvestigationCongressional superintendenceOmbudsman institutionAdministrative control system
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:175
本文旨在探討我國監察權的演變與析論其未來的發展方向。首先,以歷史的研究途徑,究明我國憲法上監察權的淵源,包括傳統中國的監察制度、歐美的彈劾權,以及孫中山先生的主張。其次,從制度的研究途徑,歸納各國監察制度的類型-國會監察、監察使、行政監察和獨立的監察機關,並據以研判我國監察制度的屬性。接著,檢視憲改後我國監察權的變化,例如取消同意權和民代特權、提案彈劾的門檻提高、增列彈劾權行使的對象,以及不再單獨享有調查權等。最後,試擬各項監察院改革的方案,綜論我國監察權未來的發展方向。
The provisions of Articles 95, 96, and 97 of the Constitution of the Republic of China, and Article 7 of the Additional Articles of the Republic of China provide the Control Yuan with the powers of impeachment, censure, investigation, audit and proposing corrective measures. According to the Control Law, the Control Yuan and its members may accept petitions from the people, and its members may also make circuit supervision and inspections in different areas. This paper aims to explore how the Control Yuan systems work effectively and analysis on the orientation of the Control Yuan's Powers in Future. At first, making use of historic approach, the author briefly elucidates the historical background affecting the control powers of ROC's constitution. It has patterned some of its ideas from the traditional Chinese supervision or impeachment, the Western parliamentary or congressional impeachment, and The Power of Control by Dr. Sun Yat-sen. Likewise, dealing with the institutional approach, the writer inducts the types of supervise systems in various countries, included congressional superintendence, Ombudsman institution, administrative control system and independent organization of control and investigate the attribute of the powers of control, one of the five powers of the government specified in the Constitution of the ROC. Moreover, the author examines the variations and differences that prior to the proclamation on the revised constitution, such as nullifying endorsement and privileges of representative, putting to a higher threshold of the impeachment motion, adding the objects of applying impeachment, and having investigation solely responsible no more. Thus, the writer intents to provide four choices for the reform of the Control Yuan: (1) Shall be the highest control organ of the state; (2) Subordinate to the legislative system; (3) Be attached to administrative organization; (4) Abolish the Control Yuan. Some scholars believe, and institution reform experiences in many countries have demonstrated, that gradual reforms have a better chance of success. The control institution rooted in ancient Chinese history, the Western impeachment and Dr. Sun Yat-sen's unprecedented theory and created and empowered by our nation's Constitution as an integral part of Government. To effectively exercise control powers, the control institution will be creative in its work. The orientation and reform of control powers may have held the power of sanction or chastisement that reformers desire.
期刊論文
1.吳秀玲(19980400)。中共「行政監察法」評析。中國大陸研究,41(4),39-48+76。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lijphart, Arend(1998)。Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
2.王元俊(1992)。中國監督學。中國監督學。北京:東方出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.李惠宗(2001)。中華民國憲法概要--憲法生活之新思維。臺北:元照出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.董翔飛(2000)。中國憲法與政府(暨「大法官解釋文與我的不同意見書」)。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.李炳南(1998)。不確定的憲政:第三階段憲政改革之研究。臺北:揚智文化公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.林子儀、葉俊榮、黃昭元、張文貞(2003)。憲法-權力分立。臺北:新學林。  延伸查詢new window
7.林紀東(1993)。中華民國憲法逐條釋義。臺北市:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.浦興祖(1999)。中華人民共和國政治制度。上海:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.周繼祥(2000)。中華民國憲法概論。臺北:揚智。  延伸查詢new window
10.葉俊榮(2003)。民主轉型與憲法變遷。台北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
11.監察院國際事務小組(2003)。英國暨愛爾蘭監察工作。  延伸查詢new window
12.監察院國際事務小組(2006)。瑞典國會監察使。臺北:監察院。  延伸查詢new window
13.監察院國際事務小組(2005)。歐盟監察工作。台北:監察院。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Alatas, Syed Hussein(1990)。Corruption: Its Nature, Causes and Functions。  new window
2.Caiden, G. E.(1983)。International Handbooks of the Ombudsman。  new window
3.Holmes, Heslie(1993)。The End of Communist Power: Anti-Corruption Campaigns and Legitimation Crisis。  new window
4.Tseblis, George & Jeannette Money(1997)。Bicameralism。  new window
5.王元廷、高明秋、林燕華(2005)。國會對獨立機關監督之研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.皮純協等(1991)。中外監察制度簡史。  延伸查詢new window
7.任德厚(1981)。監察制度與政治防腐。  延伸查詢new window
8.吳秀玲(1994)。從憲改過程析論我國監察權最近之變革。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳秀玲(2007)。政府體制的設計和選擇--從五權憲法到現行憲法增修。  延伸查詢new window
10.李伸一(2006)。監察院的困境與突破。  延伸查詢new window
11.李炳南、楊智傑(2006)。第七次修憲過程瑕疵與正當性。  延伸查詢new window
12.李鴻禧等(2002)。台灣憲法之縱剖橫切。  延伸查詢new window
13.周陽山(2005)。芬蘭新憲法與憲政體制之變遷--兼論芬蘭監察使制度。  延伸查詢new window
14.周陽山(2007)。從「善治」看五權憲法。  延伸查詢new window
15.周陽山、李文郎(2006)。以色列審計長兼監察使--一項獨特的制度運作。  延伸查詢new window
16.周繼祥(2005)。政治學--21 世紀新觀點。  延伸查詢new window
17.柯瓊鳳(2003)。日本政府內控及檢查制度之研究。  延伸查詢new window
18.洪國興等(2006)。香港澳門監察業務與資訊科技之應用。  延伸查詢new window
19.孫中山著;秦孝儀主編(1989)。國父全集編輯委員會編。  延伸查詢new window
20.徐有守(2006)。考試監察兩權未來的發展。  延伸查詢new window
21.高永光主編(2006)。我國考試權與監察權之發展與變革。  延伸查詢new window
22.張治安(1991)。現行監察制度改革芻議。  延伸查詢new window
23.張榮林(1969)。中國憲法上監察權之研究。  延伸查詢new window
24.張劍寒(1967)。彈劾權。  延伸查詢new window
25.陳明通(2007)。內閣制中央政府:總統、國會、國務院關係。  延伸查詢new window
26.陳清雲(2004)。論立法機關之功能。  延伸查詢new window
27.賀凌虛(1967)。中國監察制度之沿革。  延伸查詢new window
28.賀凌虛(2004)。近代中國政治體制論集。  延伸查詢new window
29.黃越欽(1998)。各國監察制度之比較研究。  延伸查詢new window
30.雷震(1990)。雷震專論集--監察院之將來。  延伸查詢new window
31.監察院國際事務小組編譯(2002)。加勒比海國家監察制度。  延伸查詢new window
32.監察院國際事務小組編譯(2002)。阿根廷監察制度。  延伸查詢new window
33.監察院國際事務小組編譯(2004)。安地諾區域各國監察制度經驗比較。  延伸查詢new window
34.監察院國際事務小組編譯(2005)。巴拿馬護民官制度。  延伸查詢new window
35.監察院國際事務小組編譯(2006)。巴拉圭與西班牙護民官制度比較。  延伸查詢new window
36.監察院綜合規劃室(2007)。監察院工作概況:中華民國95 年1 月至12 月。  延伸查詢new window
37.趙榮耀主編(2005)。監察院國際事務工作紀要2002-2004。  延伸查詢new window
38.蔡志芳(1991)。「關於監察院制度問題」討論意見。  延伸查詢new window
39.鄭永年(1999)。論中共黨內集團腐敗的制度根源。  延伸查詢new window
40.薛春明等(2007)。巴拿馬共和國監察制度之運作。  延伸查詢new window
41.薩孟武(1960)。中華民國憲法概要。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top