本文旨要探討中共行政監察制度中有關「國務院監察部」與「紀律檢查委員會」之執行狀況。首先，先從歷史研究途徑瞭解中共行政監察制度的淵源及理念。其次，採取文獻分析法，蒐集行政監察法制資料、報章媒體、資訊網際網路等資料，試圖從制度面瞭解中共行政監察體系多軌性。再者，檢視「國務院監察部」與「紀律檢查委員會」執法過程中所易出現之體制衝突或價值矛盾，尤其自1993年開始推行紀律檢查委員會和監察部合署辦公以來，面對中共政治體制所強調「以黨領政」，監察制度運作實況及利弊得失。最後，試研擬中共監察制度之改革建議，俾供未來立法之參考。

The main purpose of this article is to probe into the administrative supervision system of Chinese Communist Party on the execution status of the Ministry of Supervision of State Council and the Disciplinary Committee. Firstly, through historical research approach, the origin and the concept of the administrative supervision system of Chinese Communist Party could be understood. Secondly, the documentary analysis was adopted to gather the information of the legal system of the administrative supervision, which came from newspapers, magazines and internets. An attempt was made to understand the multiple tracks of the administrative supervision system of Chinese Communist party. Furthermore, the systematic conflict and the value contradiction, which were easily happened when ”The Ministry of Supervision of State Council” and ”The Disciplinary Committee” enforced the law, were surveyed. ”The Disciplinary Committee and the Ministry of Supervision working in the same office” was carried out since 1993. The political system of Chinese Communist Party emphasized ”Party dominates politics.” Under such supervision system and the actual operation status, its advantages and disadvantages were specially surveyed in this article. At last a reformation suggestion on Chinese Communist Party's supervision system was brought out for reference in future legislation.