:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:發展錨定式科學寫作模式之行動研究
書刊名:科學教育學刊
作者:林雅慧張文華張惠博
作者(外文):Lin, Ya-huiChang, Wen-huaChang, Huey-por
出版日期:2007
卷期:15:5
頁次:頁491-520
主題關鍵詞:科學寫作錨定Science writingAnchoring
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:35
在涵化入科學社群的過程中,語言扮演一個關鍵的角色。學習者可以運用寫作的語言作為工具,來學習與建構其對科學的理解。本行動研究即希望發展出協助學生經由寫作學習科學的教學模式,並透過設計的寫作任務協助學生建構對科學概念的理解。研究者們先運用單元概念關係圖分析教學單元,而後設計連續性的寫作任務,並探究一班四年級二十六位學生在每個寫作任務期間所呈現的寫作表徵及影響寫作的原因。第一階段的研究發現約有92% 的學生傾向於在寫作文本中描述可觀察的現象與操弄過的經驗,但缺乏描述先前學習單元中所學習的定義或專有術語,而且也很少對兩個或以上的因素做整合性的說明。第二階段,研究者設計錨定式科學寫作模式,以學習者在先前學習單元中所獲得的具體學習經驗當做錨定物,促使學習者反思與轉化他們對於科學概念的理解,由此提升了學生整合觀察的現象與專有術語或定義的學習成效。本研究之成果可供科學教師參酌,設計協助學生經由寫作學習科學的系列教學活動。
Language plays a critical role in enculturating learners into science communities. Written language could be used as a tool in science learning and constructing understandings. This study employed the writing tasks to facilitate students' understandings and coordinate the evidences and theories. The tasks were designed and sequenced in each science unit followed a content analysis by applying concept mapping strategy. This study explored the characteristics of writing representations for 26 4th graders' and generated the influencing factors in the writing sessions. The first study found that around 92% of the 4th graders tended to incorporate observable phenomena and manipulating their experiences instead of applying definitions and terms from previous lessons. The authors proposed a model of situated science writing for the study in the second stage, and found that students applied their concrete learning experiences from previous lessons as the anchors inducing their reflection and transforming their understandings. The data indicated that the model is successful in increasing students' learning on connecting observed phenomena and the specialized terms or definitions.
期刊論文
1.Hand, B.、Prain, V.、Trobe, L.、Lawrence, C.、Yore, L. D.(1999)。A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy。International Journal of Science Education,21(10),1021-1035。  new window
2.林雅慧、張文華、林陳涌(20030300)。國小低年級學生參與科學對談的類型之研究。科學教育學刊,11(1),51-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Bangert-Drowns, R. L.、Hurley, M. M.、Wilkinson, B.(2004)。The Effects of School-based Writing-to-learn Interventions on Academic Achievement: A Metaanalysis。Review of Educational Research,74(1),29-58。  new window
4.Keys, C. W.、Hand, B.、Prain, V.、Collins, S.(1999)。Using the Science Writing Heuristic as a Tool for Learning from Laboratory Investigations in Secondary Science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,36(10),1065-1084。  new window
5.Yore, L. D.、Bisanz, G. L.、Hand, B. M.(2003)。Examining the Literacy Component of Science Literacy: 25 Years of Language Arts and Science Research。International Journal of Science Education,25(6),689-725。  new window
6.Wiley, J.、Voss, J. F.(1999)。Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text。Journal of Educational Psychology,91,301-311。  new window
7.Klein, P. D.(2006)。The challenges of scientific literacy: From the viewpoint of second-generation cognitive science。International Journal of Science Education,28(2/3),143-178。  new window
8.Sandoval, W. A.、Millwood, K. A.(2005)。The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations。Cognition and Instruction,23(1),23-55。  new window
9.Duschl, R. A.、Osborne, J.(2002)。Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education。Studies in Science Education,38(1),39-72。  new window
10.Bloom, J. W.(1995)。Assessing and Extending the Scope of Children's Contexts of Meaning: Context Map as a Methodological Perspective。International Journal of Science Education,17(2),167-187。  new window
11.Keys, C. W.(2000)。Investigating the Thinking Processes of Eighth Grade Writers during the Composition of a Scientific Laboratory Report。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(7),676-690。  new window
12.Keys, C. W.(1999)。Language as an Indicator of Meaning Generation: An Analysis of Middle School Students' Writing Discourse about Scientific Investigations。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,36(9),1044-1061。  new window
13.Klein, P. D.(1999)。Reopening Inquiry into Cognitive Process in Writing-to-learn。Educational Psychology Review,11(3),203-270。  new window
14.Patterson, E. W.(2001)。Structuring the Composition Process in Scientific Writing。International Journal of Science Education,23(1),1-16。  new window
15.Hand, B.、Prain, V.(2002)。Teachers Implementing Writing-to-learning Strategies in Junior Secondary Science: A Case Study。Science Education,86(6),737-755。  new window
16.Bloom, J. W.(1992)。The Development of Scientific Knowledge in Elementary School Children: A Context of Meaning Perspective。Science Education,76(4),399-413。  new window
17.Shepardson, D. P.、Britsch, S. J.(2001)。The Role of Children's Journals in Elementary School Science Activities。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38(1),43-69。  new window
18.Hand, B.、Yang, E. M.(2004)。Using a Science Writing Heuristic to Enhance Learning Outcomes from Laboratory Activities in Seventh-grade Science: Quantitative and Qualitative Aspects。International Journal of Science Education,26(2),131-149。  new window
會議論文
1.Lin, Y. H.、Chang, W. H.(2002)。An Elementary Teacher's Action Research on Scaffolding Students in Talking Science。0。  new window
2.Lin, Y. H.、Chang, W. H.(2003)。An Elementary Teacher's Action Research on Engaging Students in Talking Science。0。  new window
研究報告
1.Bell, B.、Bareiss, R.、Beckwith, R.(1993)。The Role of Anchored Instruction in the Design of a Hypermedia Science Museum Exhibit。0。  new window
學位論文
1.蔡志賢(2003)。科學寫作融入國小自然科教學的行動研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳水煌(2003)。科學寫作促進學生科學概念學習之研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.王金泉(2005)。九年級學生科學寫作與學習成就之探討-以「溫度與熱」為例,0。  延伸查詢new window
4.李美惠(2005)。科學寫作在自然科學教學與評量的應用-以電影中酸鹼現象之觀察與解釋為例,0。  延伸查詢new window
5.羅廷瑛(2004)。兩種建構取向教學模式對國小學生「自然與生活科技領域」科學學習表現之影響,0。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wallace, C. S.、Hand, B.、Prain, V.(2004)。Writing and Learning in the Science Classroom。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Bybee, Rodger W.(1997)。Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices。Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann。  new window
3.Driver, R.、Leach, J.、Millar, R.、Scott, P.(1996)。Young People's Images of Science。Open University Press。  new window
4.Glynn, S. M.、Yeany, R. H.、Britton, B. K.、王美芬、熊召弟、段曉林、熊同鑫(1996)。科學學習心理學。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bereiter, Carl、Scardamalia, Marlene(1987)。The Psychology of Written Composition。Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
6.黃瑞琴(2005)。質的教育研究方法。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Wellington, J. J.、Osborne, J.(2001)。Language and literacy in science education。Open University Press。  new window
8.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
9.Carr, Wilfred、Kemmis, Stephen(1986)。Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research。Falmer Press。  new window
10.Patton, Michael Quinn、吳芝儀、李奉儒(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.Cervetti, G. N.、Pearson, P. D.、Bravo, M. A.、Barber, J.(2005)。Reading and Writing in the Service of Inquiry-based Science。Reading and Writing in the Service of Inquiry-based Science。0。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top