臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國小師資生應用Big6技能於自然領域探究式教學的學習與改進
書刊名：科學教育學刊
作者：盧秀琴／戴文雄
作者(外文)：Lu, Chow-chin／Tai, Wen-hsiung
出版日期：2012
卷期：20:2
頁次：頁171-192
主題關鍵詞：Big6技能；師資生；探究式教學；錨定式教學；Big6 skills；Pre-service teachers；Inquiry teaching；Anchored instruction
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:71
  • 點閱點閱:154
本研究以91名師資生為研究對象，探討他們如何應用Big6技能於自然領域進行探究式教學(著重在錨定式教學)，同時比較自然系與非自然系背景，是否會影響其專業成長。首先教授理論課程，其次觀摩3部教學案例，接著應用Big6技能設計教案、修正教案，然後進行微型教學和國小試教。結果顯示：(1)師資生感受Big6技能之搜尋策略、取得資訊與使用資訊等學習最為深刻。(2)自然系師資生應用Big6技能設計教案優於非自然系師資生，主要在於搜尋策略、取得資訊與整合資訊。(3)有52.1%師資生進行探究式教學時，能利用圖片傳達提問效果、或從圖片尋找並印證科學、以及創造出問題解決的情境。(4)有25.8%師資生不瞭解國小學童的背景知識，無法將影片內容結合課程播出，無法指導學童參與實驗設計，產生科學知識的另有概念。
In this research we investigated how ninety-one pre-service elementary teachers used Big6 skill in learning and improving their science inquiry teaching (with a focus on anchored instruction). We also explored whether their learning background as science and non-science majors affected their professional growth. First, the researcher taught theoretical courses including showing pre-service teachers three teaching case films. Then, the researcher asked pre-service teachers to use Big6 skills when designing and implementing their teaching plans. Last, the researcher had them teach in micro-teaching and elementary schools. The results showed that (1) Pre-service teachers developed a strong commitment to using Big6 skill to identify teaching strategies, to collect information and to use the information which they had collected. (2) Pre-service teachers who had a science learning background designed better teaching plans than non-science background pre-service teachers. Science background teachers could better search teaching strategies, collect information and integrate varied information, by using Big6 skills in designing their teaching plans. (3) 52.1% of pre-service teachers could use pictures to convey questions or to confirm scientific inferences. When they used the Inquiry teaching method to teach students, they could also design a problem based learning situation. (4) 25.8% of pre-service teachers did not understand elementary school students’ knowledge background, This created a problem for combining the teaching movie with science contexts, and made these teachers unable to direct some students experiments, causing students to develop alternative conceptions of science phenomena.
期刊論文
1.劉世雄(20000800)。國小教師運用資訊科技融入教學策略之探討。資訊與教育，78，60-66。  延伸查詢new window
2.張國恩(19990800)。資訊融入各科教學之內涵與實施。資訊與教育，72，2-9。  延伸查詢new window
3.溫嘉榮、施文玲、林鳳釵(20041200)。中小學教師應具備之資訊素養能力指標之研究。高雄師大學報．教育與社會科學類，17，97-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Corbin, J. M.、Strauss, A. L.(1990)。Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria。Qualitative Sociology，13(1)，3-21。  new window
5.徐新逸、吳佩謹(20020300)。資訊融入教學的現代意義與具體作為。教學科技與媒體，59，63-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.McClure, Charles R.(1994)。Network Literacy: A Role for Libraries?。Information Technology and Libraries，13(2)，115-125。  new window
7.張順發、羅希哲(2005)。教師教學資訊 素養與教學效能關係之研究。教育經營與管理研究集刊，1，73-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林菁(2010)。利用Big6問題解決模式教導大一學生資訊素養之行動研究。教學科技與媒體，91，37-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.徐新逸(1995)。如何借重電腦科技來提升問題解決的能力？--談「錨式情境教學法」之理論基礎與實例應用(下)。教學科技與媒體，21，47-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林雅慧、張文華、張惠博(2007)。發展錨定式科學寫作模式之研究。科學教育學刊，15(5)，491-520。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Arp, L.、Woodard, B. S.(2002)。Recent trends in formation literacy and instruction。Reference and User Services Quarterly，42(2)，124-132。  new window
12.Backhouse, B.(2003)。Information and communication technology integration: Beyond the early adopters。TechTrends，47(3)，5-8。  new window
13.Hakkarainen, P.(2009)。Designing and implementing a PBL course on educational digital video production: Lessons learned from a design-based research。Educational Technology Research & Development，57(2)，211-228。  new window
14.Lu, C. -G.、Tsai, C.-W.、Hong, J.-C.(2008)。Use root cause analysis teaching strategy to train primary pre-service science teachers。US-China Education Review，5(12)，47-53。  new window
15.Mittenneyer, D.(2005)。Incoming first year undergraduate students: How information literate are they?。Education for Information，23(4)，203-232。  new window
會議論文
1.吳美美(1999)。從擴散原理論教師的資訊素養。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lu, C.-C.(2012)。Building “5 Why scaffolding guided questioning” elementary science teaching case films。Honolulu, HI。  new window
3.Lu, C,C.、Tai, W.-H.(2010)。Premice teachers' professional growth of Big6 skills-information technology integrated into elementary science instruction as an example。Taipei, Taiwan。  new window
圖書
1.Eisenberg, M. B.、Berkowitz, R. E.(2003)。The Definitive Big6 Workshop Handbook。Worthington, OH：Linworth。  new window
2.Eisenberg, M. B.、Berkowitz, R. E.(1999)。Teaching information & technology skills: The big6 in elementary schools。Linworth。  new window
3.Kuhlthau, C. C.、Maniotes, L. K.、Caspari, A. K.(2007)。Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century。Westport, CT：Libraries Unlimited。  new window
4.Chiappetta, E. L.、Koballa, T. R., Jr.、Collette, A. T.(1998)。Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools。Upper Saddle River, NJ：Merrill PrenticeHall。  new window
5.教育部(2008)。「提升臺北國民小學校長及教師資訊素養與資訊科技應用能力培訓」實施計畫。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.Callison, D.、Preddy, L.(2006)。The blue book on information age inquiry, instruction, and literacy。Westport, CT。  new window
7.Yang, J.-H.、Huang, I. T.-C.、Aldridge, J. M.(2002)。Investigating factors that prevent science teachers from creating positive learning environments in Taiwan。Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective。River Edge, NJ。  new window
其他
1.National Forum on Information Literacy(1998)。A Progress Report on Information Literacy: An Update on the American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report，http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/progressreport。  new window
2.International Society for Technology in Education(1999)。ISTE recommended Foundations in Technology for all Teachers，http://www. iste.org/Projects/Tech-Standards/Found.html。  new window
3.教育部(2001)。中小學資訊教育總藍圖，台北：教育部。，http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/b0089/guideline(9006).pdf， 2009/05/28。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Rockman, I. F.(2004)。Introduction: The importance of information literacy。Integrating information literacy into the higher education curriculum: Practical models for transformation。San Francisco：Jossey- Bass。  new window
2.王美芬(2007)。國小科學教師的實習歷程與輔導策略。科學教師之路--由實習輔導到專業成長。臺北市：心理。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1306（臺灣：1291，外國：15） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67416323
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上