The Effects of Causal Structure on Levels of Representation for Chinese Children's Narrative Comprehension_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	The Effects of Causal Structure on Levels of Representation for Chinese Children's Narrative Comprehension
書刊名：	中華心理學刊
作者：	曾玉村／陳沛嵐
作者(外文)：	Tzeng, Yuhtsuen／Chen, Pei-lan
出版日期：	2006
卷期：	48:2
頁次：	頁115-138
主題關鍵詞：	因果架構；閱讀表徵；文本表徵；情境模式；Causal structure；Reading comprehension；Text base representation；Situation model
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:101

本研究旨在探討因果架構對中文閱讀理解表徵的影響，進一步細分並檢驗其影響的表徵層次，以及這些因素受到發展的影響。實驗一分別抽取四、六年級各32名學生，讓學生閱讀研究者根據因果關係操弄而編成的階層版與序列版兩種因果架構文章，學生依據所形成的表徵來回答之後包含文本表徵與情境模式的閱讀理解測驗題。實驗二採取相同的實驗程序和人數，但改以包含特定寓意的文章作為操弄因果架構的材料，以期有利於形成較佳的情境模式。結果發現：第一、兩個實驗都證實因果架構對中文讀者閱讀表徵有影響，此說明了因果架構對中文理解的重要性。第二、兩個實驗的結果指出，階層版的因果架構有助於文本表徵的層次，這可能是因為它能使讀者較容易整合文章中的事件以幫助記憶，故有利於文本表徵的層次。同時也發現，階層版因果架構只有在包含特定意涵的文章中才有助於情境模式的層次，推測可能是因為閱讀這樣的文章較易激發讀者相關的背景知識和組織訊息，故能有利於情境模式的層次。第三、兩個實驗所觀察到的發展組型指出，四、六年級在文本表徵的表現上並無差異，但六年級在情境模式的表現上優於四年級。我們推論六年級可能在閱讀能力上具有較為純孰的整體性推論技能，使得他們得以整合文章各種訊息並且建立適當的情境模式。

以文找文

We tested whether causal structures of text affected Chinese readers and further examined this effect on two levels of representation for 4(superscript th) & 6(superscript th) grade students. Structures of texts were manipulated to create a hierarchical version in which all story episodes were organized by a major common goal and a sequential version in which each story episode was served by a distinctive goal. Experiment 1 revealed that hierarchical texts benefit Chinese readers than sequential versions for text-based representation but not for situation models. Experiment 2, using more authentic stories which carry clear moral, indicated that hierarchical stories benefit students for both levels of representation whereas the effect of grade appears for situation models only but not for text-based representation. Older readers did not differ from younger readers in text-based representation but performed better in situation models across two experiments. Causal structures of text are important for Chinese narrative comprehension and it depends on types of representation measured and student's grade level.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Zwaan, R. A.、Langston, M. C.、Graesser, A. C.(1995)。The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model。Psychological Science，6(5)，292-297。
2.	Zwaan, R. A.、Radvansky, G. A.(1998)。Situation models in languages and memory。Psychological Bulletin，123，162-185。
3.	Athey, I.(1983)。Language development factors related to reading development。Journal of Educational Research，76(4)，197-203。
4.	Beck, I. L.、McKeown, M. G.、Sinatra, G. M.、Loxterman, J. A.(1991)。Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility。Reading Research Quarterly，27，251-276。
5.	Black, J. B.、Bower, G. H.(1980)。Story understanding as problem solving。Poetics，9(1-3)，223-250。
6.	Bloom, C. P.、Fletcher, C. R.、van den Broek, P.、Reitz, L.、Shapiro, B. P.(1990)。An on-line assessment of causal reasoning during comprehension。Memory and Cognition，18(1)，65-71。
7.	Brown, A. L.、Day, J. D.(1983)。Macrorules for summarizing text: The development of expertise。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior，22，1-14。
8.	Cote, N. A.、Goldman, S. R.、Saul, E. U.(1998)。Students making sense of informational text:Relations between processing and representation。Discourse Processes，25(1)，1-53。
9.	Fletcher, C. R.、Bloom, C. P.(1988)。Causal reasoning in comprehension of simple narrative texts。Journal of Memory and Language，27，235-244。
10.	Fletcher, C. R.、Chrysler, S. T.(1990)。Surface forms, textbases, and situation models: Recognition memory for three types of textual information。Discourse Processes，13，191-205。
11.	Fletcher, C. R.、Hummel, J. E.、Marsolek, C. J.(1990)。Causality and the allocation of attention during comprehension。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition，16，233-240。
12.	Graesser, A. C.、Kassler, M. A.、Kreuz, R. J.、McLain-Alien, B.(1998)。Verification of statements about story worlds that deviate from normal conceptions of time: What is true about Einstein’s Dream?。Cognitive Psychology，35，246-301。
13.	Jarvella, R. J.(1971)。Syntatic processing of connected speech。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior，10，409-416。
14.	Kintsch, W.、van Dijk, T. A.(1978)。Towards a model of text comprehension and production。Psychological Review，85，363-394。
15.	Leon, J. A.、Perez, O.(2001)。The influence of prior knowledge on the time course of clinical diagnosis inferences: A comparison of experts and novices。Discourse Processes，57(2)，187-213。
16.	Li, W.(2004)。Topic chains in Chinese discourse。Discourse Processes，37，25-45。
17.	Linderholm, T.、Everson, G, M.、van den Broek, P.、Mischinski, M.、Crittenden, A.、Samuels, J.(2000)。Effects of causal text revisions on moreand less-skilled readers' comprehension of easy and difficult texts。Cognition and Instruction，18(4)，525-556。
18.	Liu, I. M.(1976)。Text writing and memory of knowledge。Chinese Journal of Psychology，18，1-18。
19.	Lutz, M. F.、Radvansky, G. A.(1997)。The fate of completed goal information in narrative comprehension。Journal of Memory and Language，36，293-310。
20.	Mani, K.、Johnson-Laird, P. N.(1982)。The mental representation of spatial descriptions。Memory and Cognition，10(2)，181-187。
21.	Mckoon, G.、Ratcliff, R.(1992)。Inferences during reading。Psychological Review，99，440-466。
22.	Morrow, D. G.、Greenspan, S. L.、Bower, G. H.(1987)。Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension。Journal of Memory and Language，26，165-187。
23.	O'Brien, E. J.、Myers, J. L.(1987)。The role causal connections in the retrieval of text。Memory and Cognition，15，419-427。
24.	Ohtsuka, K.、Brewer, W. F.(1992)。Discourse organization in the comprehension of temporal order。Discourse Processes，15，317-336。
25.	Perring, W.、Kintsch, W.(1985)。Proposition and situational representations of text。Journal of Memory and Language，24，503-518。
26.	Ratcliff, R.、McKoon, G.(1978)。Priming in item recognition: Evidence for the propositional structure of sentences。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior，17，403-417。
27.	Richards, E.、Singer, M.(2001)。Representation of complex goal structures in narrative comprehension。Discourse Processes，31(2)，111-135。
28.	Suh, S.、Trabasso, T.(1993)。Inferences during reading: Converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols, and recognition priming。Journal of Memory and Language，32，279-300。
29.	Tapiero, I.、van den Broek, P.、Quintana, M. P.(2002)。The mental representation of narrative texts as networks: the role of necessity and sufficiency in the detection of different types of causal relations。Discourse Processes，34(3)，237-258。
30.	van den Broek, P.(1988)。The effects of causal relations and hierarchical position on the importance of story statements。Journal of Memory and Language，27，1-22。
31.	Van den Broek, P.、Lorch, R. F.(1993)。Network representations of causal relations in memory for narrative texts: Evidence from primed recognition。Discourse Processes，16，75-98。
32.	Van den Broek, P.、Trabasso, T.(1986)。Causal networks versus goal hierarchies in summarizing text。Discourse Processes，9，1-15。
33.	Keenan, Janice M.、Baillet, Susan D.、Brown, Polly(1984)。The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior，23(2)，115-126。
34.	Trabasso, Tom、Van den Broek, Paul W.(1985)。Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events。Journal of Memory and Language，24(5)，612-630。
35.	Trabasso, Tom、Sperry, Linda L.(1985)。Causal Relatedness and Importance of Story Events。Journal of Memory and Language，24，595-611。
36.	Trabasso, Tom、van den Broek, Paul、Suh, So Young(1989)。Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories。Discourse Processes，12(1)，1-25。
37.	Goldman, S. R.、Varnhagen, C. K.(1986)。Memory for embedded and sequential story structures。Journal of Memory and Language，25(4)，401-418。
38.	Vidal-Abarca, E.、Martinez, G.、Gilabert, R.(2000)。Two procedures to improve instructional text: Effects on memory and learning。Journal of Educational Psychology，92(1)，107-116。
39.	Zwaan, R. A.、Magliano, J. P.、Graesser, A. C.(1995)。Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition，21(2)，386-397。
40.	Horiba, Y.(1993)。The role of causal reasoning and language competence in narrative comprehension。Studies in Second Language Acquisition，15，49-81。

會議論文
1.	Tzeng, Y.、Chen, M.(2002)。The role of causal structure for Chinese narrative comprehension。The Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse。Chicago, IL。
2.	Tzeng, Y.、Chen, M.、Chen, P.(2006)。Children's comprehension of Chinese narratives with causal but without anaphoric coherence。Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse。Minneapolis, MN。

圖書
1.	Graesser, A. C.、Clark, L. C.(1985)。Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge。Noewood, NJ：Ablex。
2.	Schank, R. C.、Abelson, R.(1977)。Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc。
3.	Chall, J. S.(1996)。Stages of reading development。Fort Worth, TX：Qrlando, FL：Harcourt, Brace and World：Harcourt Brace。
4.	Johnson-Laird, Philip Nicholas(1983)。Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Harvard University Press。
5.	Kintsch, Walter(1998)。Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition。Cambridge University Press。
6.	van Dijk, Teun Adrianus、Kintsch, Walter(1983)。Strategies of discourse comprehension。Academic Press。
7.	Kintsch, Walter(1974)。The representation of meaning in memory。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。

圖書論文
1.	Fletcher, C. R.(1994)。Levels of representation in memory for discourse。Handbook of Psycholinguistics。Academic Press。
2.	Fletcher, C. R.、Chrysler, S. T.、van den Broek, P. W.、Deaton, J. A.、Bloom, C. P.(1994)。he role of co-occurrence, co-reference, ad causality in the coherence of conjoined sentences。Sources of coherence in reading。Hillsdale, NJ：Erlbaum。
3.	Graesser, A. C.、Olde, B.、Klettke, B.(2005)。How does the mind construct and represent stories?。Narrative Impact。Mahwah, NJ：LEA。
4.	van den Broek, P. W.(1994)。Comprehension and memory of narratives texts: Inferences and coherence。Handbook of Psycholinguistics。New York：Academic Press。
5.	Li, Charles N.、Thompson, Sandra A.(1976)。Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language。Subject and Topic。Academic Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	兒童閱讀歷程的代名詞與因果推論發展研究：橫切與個別差異的分析
2.	讀懂最重要：提升素養促進學習的教育精髓

1.	鷹架概念構圖教學模式的建立與實施成效研究
2.	文章的因果架構對不同年齡成人讀者理解表徵影響之研究

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫