:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Aiken內容效度係數和同質性信度係數在溫泉旅館業企業經營風險量表之運用
書刊名:管理實務與理論研究
作者:賴世國張家銘 引用關係
作者(外文):Lai, Shih-kuoChang, Chia-ming
出版日期:2007
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁64-75
主題關鍵詞:內容效度同質性信度溫泉旅館業企業經營風險量表Content validityHomogeneity reliabilityHot-spring hotel industriesEnterprise business risks scale
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:82
本研究主要目的在編製一份溫泉旅館業企業經營風險量表,以Aiken提出之內容效度係數與同質性信度係數量化統計方法,檢定溫泉旅館業企業經營風險量表是否具有良好的專家內容效度與同質性信度。本研究針對12位專家學者採問卷調查方式蒐集資料,以李克特(Likert Scale)五點計分評量法進行題項重要性的評定。研究結果顯示本量表各題項內容效度係數(V值)爲.71至.98間;同質性信度係數(H值)爲.57至.93間,所有題項均達顯著水準,具有極高的專家內容效度與同質性信度,同時整份量表的內容效度係數.864與同質性信度係數.787亦達顯著水準,表示本量表整體亦具有良好專家內容效度與同質性信度,故此量表可作爲一份具有效性與可靠性的衡量工具。
The purpose of this research was to develop an enterprise business risks scale for hot-spring hotel industries and to identify this scale with high qualitative content validity and homogeneity reliability by Aiken's two quantitative methods for computing content validity coefficient and homogeneity reliability coefficient. Questionnaire survey method was used to collect data from 12 experts used a five point Likert scale to judge the importance of each item in this research. The results of this study indicated that content validity coefficient (V value) for each item ranged from .71 to .98 and the whole scale was .864; meanwhile, homogeneity reliability coefficient (H value) ranged from .57 to .93 and the whole scale was .787. A high coefficient value with significant level indicated that the whole scale or each item had high content validity and homogeneity reliability. Accordingly, this scale was used to be a valid and reliable measurement instrument.
期刊論文
1.Ruefli, T. W.、Collins, J. M.、Lacugna, J. R.(1999)。Risk measures in strategic management research: auld lang syne。Strategic Management Journal,20(2),167-194。  new window
2.Noy, E.、Ellis, S.(2003)。Corporate risk strategy: Does it vary across business activities。European Management Journal,21(1),119-128。  new window
3.Aiken, L. R.(1985)。Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings。Educational and Psychological Measurement,45(1),131-142。  new window
4.余民寧(19930100)。次序性資料的內容效度係數和同質性信度係數之計算。測驗年刊,40,199-214。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Lawshe, C. H.(1975)。A quantitative approach to content validity。Personnel Psychology,28(4),563-575。  new window
6.Aiken, L. R.(1980)。Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires。Educational and Psychological Measurement,40(4),955-959。  new window
圖書
1.張春雄、林顯達、黃新宗、劉美芳(2003)。風險管理。台中市:吉田。  延伸查詢new window
2.龐奇、林世華、陳柏熹、黃寶園、傅瓊儀、趙如錦(2005)。社會科學研究法:量化與質化取向。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.余民寧(1997)。教育測驗與評量:成就測驗與教學評量。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
4.Mehrens, W. A.、Lehmann, I. J.(1991)。Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology。New York, NY:Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
5.周文欽(2004)。研究方法:實徵性研究取向。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
6.郭生玉(1990)。心理與教育測驗。臺北:精華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.張紹勳(2001)。研究方法。滄海書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析實務。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳英豪、吳裕益(1992)。測驗與評量。高雄:復文。  延伸查詢new window
10.Murphy, K. R.、Davidshofer, C. O.(1994)。Psychological testing: Principles and applications。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE