本文從國際人權規劃建制力量角度出發，討論國際主要行為者對港人內部自決權利的態度政策變遷及其對香港選舉權利建構影響。研究發現，香港選舉權利變遷經驗突出國際人權規範社會化過程、自治體實踐經驗、地方行為體反對派內部次文化，共同影響港人對於內部自決權利之正當性認知。國際人權建制普遍對內部自決權利採取之和平民主論述，以及對於港人透過公民投票以爭取直接普選之民主參政權利的支持力量不足，促使香港特殊自治體制得以存續並呈現「資本主義代理民主」特色。

This paper examines the power of the international human rights regime by discussing key international actors' attitudes and policies toward the Hong Kong people's right to internal self-determination, meanwhile analyzing their impact on the construction of the right to election in Hong Kong. The case study of Hong Kong shows that cognition of the legitimacy of the right to self-determination is determined by international human rights norms socialization, experiences with autonomy and the subcultures of the local opposition. This paper argues that the international human rights regime holds only peaceful democratic attitude toward the right to internal self-determination. Thus, its insufficient support for Hong Kong people to claim their right to universal direct election through the referendum, turns out to allow Hong Kong's unique style of autonomy to persist with characteristics of a “capitalist proxy democracy.”