臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：The New Legal Paradigm of Jean Cohen and Its Implication for Public Online Dispute Resolution
書刊名：歐美研究
作者：陳起行 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Chishing
出版日期：2007
卷期：37:4
頁次：頁513-533
主題關鍵詞：自發性；自律；戶生性；法律原則；公共線上爭議解決；Reflexive；Self-regulation；Co-original；Legal principle；Public online dispute resolution
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:42
寇恩 (Jean Cohen) 改善屠布涅 (Gunther Teubner) 的自發性法律，以確保自律不會背離社會公共意見以及法律原則的要求。本文探討寇恩的法律理論以及史東 (Susan Sturm) 運用相容的理論解讀性騷擾這項美國第二代勞動歧視法律的發展。作者並且進一步指出，德渥金 (Ronald Dworkin) 的裁判理論可以藉由寇恩的法律典範加強社會對話，而後者的理論也會因此更形完整。最後，本文建議發展公共線上爭議解決機制，做為落實寇恩法律典範重要的一步。
Cohen improves Teubner’s reflexive legal paradigm to insure self-regulation stays in contact with the society-wide formation of public opinion and legal principles. This article discusses Cohen’s paradigm and Sturm’s analysis of the sexual harassment issue as the second generation of labor discrimination, which is compatible to Cohen’s model. The author then illustrates how an improvement of Dworkin’s theory of adjudication that emphasizes the inclusion of social dialogue can strengthen Cohen’s paradigm, and how the development of public online dispute resolution can be an important step towards realizing Cohen’s ideal.
期刊論文
1.陳起行(20030900)。由Reno v. ACLU--案論法院與網際網路之規範。歐美研究，33(3)，599-628。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Balkin, Jack M.(2004)。Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society。New York University Law Review，79，1-58。  new window
3.Teubner, G.(1983)。Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law。Law & Society Review，17，239-286。  new window
4.Fiss, Owen(1995)。Emerging Media Technology and the First Amendment: In Search of a New Paradigm。The Yale Law Journal，104，1613-1618。  new window
5.Katsh, E.(1989)。The First Amendment and Technological Change: The New Media has a Message。George Washington Law Review，57，1459-1494。  new window
6.Perritt, Demand Henry(2000)。Dispute Resolution in Cyberspace: Demand for New Forms of ADR。Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution，15，675-703。  new window
7.Goldstein, Paul、Goldstein, P.(1997)。Copyright and Its Substitute。Wisconsin Law Review，1997，865-865。  new window
8.Sturm, S.(1991)。A Normative Theory of Public Law Remedies。The Georgetown Law Journal，79，1357-1446。  new window
9.Lodder, A. R.、Zeleznikow, J.、Lodder, Arno R.、Zeleznikow, John(2005)。Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Support Systems in a Three-step Model。Harvard Negotiation Law Review，10，287-337。  new window
10.Schultz, T.(2004)。Does Online Dispute Resolution Need Governmental Intervention? the Case for Architectures of Control and Trust。North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology，6，71-106。  new window
11.Ramasastry, Anita(2004)。Government-to-Citizen Online Dispute Resolution: A preliminary Inquiry。Washington Law Review，79，159。  new window
12.Etzioni, A.(2004)。On Protecting Children from Speech。Chicago-Kent Law Review，79，3-53。  new window
13.Etzioni, A.(2004)。Response。Chicago-Kent Law Review，79，299-313。  new window
14.Sturm, S.(2001)。Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach。Columbia Law Review，101，458-568。  new window
15.Ponte, L.(2002)。The Michigan Cyber Court: A Bold Experiment in the Development of the First Public Virtual Courthouse。North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology，4，51-91。  new window
圖書
1.Fuller, Lon(2001)。The Principles of Social Order: Selected Essays of Lon L. Fuller。Portland, OR：Hart Publishing。  new window
2.Cohen, Jean L.(2002)。Regulating Intimacy: A New Legal Paradigm。Princeton University Press。  new window
3.Katsh, Ethan、Rifkin, Janet(2001)。Online dispute resolution: Resolving conflicts in cyberspace。San Francisco, CA：John Wiley ＆ Sons, Inc.。  new window
4.Dworkin, Ronald(1977)。Taking Rights Seriously。London：Gerald Duckworth and Co Ltd.。  new window
5.Cohen, Jean L.、Arato, Andrew(1992)。Civil Society and Political Theory。MIT Press。  new window
6.Habermas, Jürgen、Rehg, William(1996)。Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
7.Ehrlich, Eugen(1975)。Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law。New York, NY：Arno。  new window
8.Teubner, G.(1998)。De Collisione Discursuum, Communicative Rationalities in Law, Morality, and Politics。Habermas on Law and Democracy。Berkeley, CA。  new window
9.Lodder, A. R.、Huygen, P. E. M.(2001)。eADR: A Simple Tool to Structure the Information Exchange between Parties in Online Alternative Dispute Resolution。Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2001: The Fourteenth Annual Conference。Amsterdam, Netherlands。  new window
10.Chen, C.(2007)。U.S. v. American Library Association: A Critical Analysis Based on the Theory of Adjudication。Essays on Important Decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court: 2000-2003。Taipei。  new window
圖書論文
1.Chen, C.(2004)。The Internet as a Forum of Law。Law and Modernity: Particular Problems。Kraków, Poland：Polpress。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1035（臺灣：1005，外國：30） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2156165 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67957645
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上