臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：由Reno v. ACLU一案論法院與網際網路之規範
書刊名：歐美研究
作者：陳起行 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Chi-shing
出版日期：2003
卷期：33:3
頁次：頁599-628
主題關鍵詞：裁判；網際網路；論述；線上爭議處理；Adjudication；Internet；Discourse；Online dispute resolution
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:96
  • 點閱點閱:76
資訊科技固然帶來許多規範上的挑戰，它也為法律形成創造了新的可能，因此，理出正確的方向十分重要。本文藉一九九七年Reno v. ACLU一案，由網際網路性質、權利意識與社會對話，以及裁判與法事實等三方面，探索法院與網際網路規範，並提出建構線上爭議處理機制，以期對於未來發展方向有所啟發。
Information technologies not only bring normative challenges, it also makes possible new ways of making laws. This article stimulates new thinking toward law making by commenting on the Reno v. ACLU case in 1997 from several perspectives: the nature of Internet, legal right versus social dialog, and legal facts of adjudication. In the conclusion, the idea of constructing online dispute resolution is introduced to suggest the possible improvement for future law making.
期刊論文
1.陳起行(200112)。資訊著作的著作性與合理使用--事理、學理及法制面研究。政大法學評論，68，183-262。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Nissenbaum, Helen(1998)。Protecting privacy in an information age: The problem of privacy in public。Law and Philosophy，17(5/6)，559-596。  new window
3.Hamilton, M. A.、Godwin, M.、Kurnit, R. A.、Strossen, N.、Woodhouse, B. B.(1996)。Regulating the internet: Should pornography get a free ride on the information superhighway? A panel discussion。Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal，14，343-386。  new window
4.Bone, R.(1995)。Lon Fuller's theory of adjudication and the false dichotomy between dispute resolution and public law models of litigation。Boston University Law Review，75，1273-1320。  new window
5.陳起行(20001200)。資訊隱私權法理探討--以美國法為中心。政大法學評論，64，297-341。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.劉靜怡(19980100)。從美國聯邦最高法院Reno v. ACLU判決談網路內容規範的過去、現在與未來。月旦法學，32，99-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Fuller, Lon L.、Winston, Kenneth I.(1978)。The Forms and Limits of Adjudication。Harvard Law Review，92(2)，353-409。  new window
8.顏厥安(20000900)。論證、客觀性與融貫性--由幾篇文獻檢討法律論證的基本問題。月旦法學，64，33-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳起行(20010300)。Dworkin法理學、融貫與法資訊系統。政大法學評論，65，1-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Aftab, P.、Savitt, N.(2001)。FTC Acts to protect children privacy online。New York Law Journal，April。  new window
11.Dworkin, R.(1995)。Constitutionalism and democracy。European Journal of Philosophy，3，2-12。  new window
12.Frosini, V.(1995)。Toward information law。Informatica E Diritto，5(2)，7-16。  new window
13.Hohfeld, W.(1917)。Fundamental legal conception as applied in judicial reasoning。The Yale Law Journal，26。  new window
14.Lessig, L.(1999)。Open Code and Open Societies: Values of Internet Governance。Chicago-Kent Law Review，74。  new window
15.McClain, L.(1993)。Rights and responsibility。Duke Law Journal，43。  new window
16.Ignatieff, M.、Parent, W. A.(1983)。A new definition of privacy for the Law。Law and Philosophy，2，305-338。  new window
17.Perritt, H., Jr.(2001)。Toward a hybrid regulatory scheme for the Internet。The University of Chicago Legal Forum，2001。  new window
18.Schauer, F.、Wise, V.(2000)。Interpreting legal citations: A symposium sponsored by the west group: Nonlegal information and the delocalization of law。Journal of Legal Studies，29，495-515。  new window
19.Wessel, M. R.、Wessel, R.(1986)。Alternative dispute resolution for the socio-scientific dispute。Journal of Law and Technology，1。  new window
會議論文
1.Dreier, T.(1995)。Developments and prospectives of copyright: From Gutenberg to data highways。The Know Right '95 Conference。Wien, Austria：Schriftenreihe der Osterreichischen Computer Gesellschaft。31-50。  new window
圖書
1.Horowitz, Donald L.(1977)。The Courts and Social Policy。Washington, DC：Brookings Institution。  new window
2.Katsh, Ethan、Rifkin, Janet(2001)。Online dispute resolution: Resolving conflicts in cyberspace。San Francisco, CA：John Wiley ＆ Sons, Inc.。  new window
3.Glendon, Mary Ann(1991)。Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse。New York：Free Press。  new window
4.翁岳生(1994)。法治國家之行政法與司法。月旦出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.林立(20020000)。法學方法論與德沃金。臺北：學林文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Dworkin, R.、Beaumont, G.、Tocqueville, A.(1979)。On the penitentiary system in the United States and its application in France。Carbondale：Southern Illinois University Press。  new window
7.Fuller, L.(1968)。Anatomy of the law。Anatomy of the law。Westport, CT。  new window
8.Habermas, Jürgen(1995)。Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy。Between facts and norms。United Kingdom。  new window
9.Hohfeld, W.(1986)。Rights and jural relations。Philosophy of law。CA。  new window
10.Korff, D.(1999)。The feasibility of a seamless system of data protection rules for the European Union。The feasibility of a seamless system of data protection rules for the European Union。EU。  new window
11.Tanaka, S.(1998)。Metamorphous of the legal systems: Toward a pluralistic coordinating forum。Das recht vor der herausforderung eines neuen jahrhundents: Erwartungen in Japan und Deutschland。Tübingen, Germany。  new window
其他
1.Davis, K. C.，ACLU(2001)。ACLU decries reported violence against Muslims and Arab Americans; joins authorities in urging tolerance and respect，沒有紀錄。  new window
2.Etzioni, A.，Buchanan, P.(1993)。On immigrants and people of color，沒有紀錄。  new window
3.Katsh, E.，Gallup Poll(2002)。Which freedoms will Americans trade for security?，0。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳起行(1997)。Multimedia and Its Copyright Implications。智慧財產權與國際私法：曾陳明汝教授六秩誕辰祝壽論文集。臺北市：國立臺灣大學法律學系。  延伸查詢new window
2.Alexy, R.(1988)。Legal expert systems and legal theory。Expert systems in law: Impacts on legal theory and computer law。Tübingen, Germany：Attempto。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1098（臺灣：1076，外國：22） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1641614 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67451009
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上