臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：由裁判理論的觀點析論United States v. American Library Association
書刊名：政大法學評論
作者：陳起行 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Chi-shing
出版日期：2007
卷期：96
頁次：頁1-55
主題關鍵詞：裁判理論；德渥金；哈伯瑪斯；情色資訊；網際網路；圖書館；軟體過濾器；Theory of adjudication；Dworkin；Habermas；Pornography；Internet；Library；Software filters
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:147
  • 點閱點閱:48
期刊論文
1.陳起行(20030900)。由Reno v. ACLU--案論法院與網際網路之規範。歐美研究，33(3)，599-628。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳起行(200112)。資訊著作的著作性與合理使用--事理、學理及法制面研究。政大法學評論，68，183-262。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.謝世民(20020600)。政治權力、政治權威與政治義務。政治與社會哲學評論，1，1-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Leiter, Brian(2003)。Beyond the Hart/Dworkin Debate: The Methodology Problem in Jurisprudence。The American Journal of Jurisprudence，48，17-51。  new window
5.Hamilton, M. A.、Godwin, M.、Kurnit, R. A.、Strossen, N.、Woodhouse, B. B.(1996)。Regulating the internet: Should pornography get a free ride on the information superhighway? A panel discussion。Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal，14，343-386。  new window
6.Schwarzschild, Maimon(2001)。Pluralism, Conversation, and Judicial Restraint。Northwestern University Law Review，95，961。  new window
7.Chayes, Abram(1976)。The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation。Harvard Law Review，89(7)，1281-1316。  new window
8.蘇永欽(19960700)。相鄰關係在民法上的幾個主要問題--並印證於Teubner的法律發展理論。法學叢刊，41(3)=163，1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Teubner, G.(1993)。Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modem Law。Law & Soc'y Rev.，17(2)，239。  new window
10.石元康(19980300)。道德、法律與社群--哈特[H.L.A. Hart]與德弗林[Patrick Devlin]的論辯。當代，9=127，30-43。  延伸查詢new window
11.莊世同(20000600)。論法律原則的地位：為消極的法律原則理論而辯。輔仁法學，19，1-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.顏厥安(20010500)。溝通、制度與民主文化--由哈伯瑪斯的法理論初探社會立憲主義。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，30(3)，1-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Black, J.(1996)。Constitutionalising Self-Regulation。The Modern Law Review，59，24-55。  new window
14.Bone, R.(1995)。Lon Fuller's theory of adjudication and the false dichotomy between dispute resolution and public law models of litigation。Boston University Law Review，75，1273-1320。  new window
15.Dworkin, Ronald M.(1967)。The Model of Rules。U. Chi. L. Rev.，35，14。  new window
16.Goldstein, P.(1997)。Copyright and Its Substitutes, the Kastenmeier Lecture。Wisconsin Law Review，865。  new window
17.Katsh, E.(1989)。The First Amendment and Technological Change: The New Media has a Message。George Washington Law Review，57，1459-1494。  new window
18.Marmor, A.(1991)。Coherence, Holism, and Interpretation: The Epistemic Foundations of Dworkin's Legal Theory。Law and Philosophy，10，383-412。  new window
19.MCCARTY, L. THORNE(199007)。Artificial Intelligence and Law: How to Get There from Here。Ratio Juris，3(2)，189-200。  new window
20.Fiss, Owen M.(1979)。Forward: The Forms of Justice。Harvard Law Review，93(1)，39-44。  new window
21.Pahel, K.(1985)。The Public Process of Moral Adjudication。Social Theory and Practice，11(2)，183-205。  new window
22.陳起行(20001200)。資訊隱私權法理探討--以美國法為中心。政大法學評論，64，297-341。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.陳起行(20020300)。美國法理學發展概述，1870-1970。政大法學評論，69，1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus(1958)。Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals。Harvard Law Review，71(4)，593-629。  new window
25.Fuller, Lon L.(1958)。Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart。Harvard Law Review，71(4)，630-672。  new window
26.Bennett, Robert W.(2001)。Counter-Conversationalism and the Sense of Difficulty。Northwestern University Law Review，95，845-906。  new window
27.Alexy, Robert、Peczenik, Aleksander(1990)。The Concept of Coherence And Its Significance for Discursive Rationality。Ratio Juris，3(1)，130-147。  new window
28.Levenbook, B.(1984)。The Role of Coherence in Legal Reasoning。Law And Philosophy，3，355-374。  new window
29.顏厥安(20020300)。規則、理性與法治。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，31(2)，1-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.陳起行(20010300)。Dworkin法理學、融貫與法資訊系統。政大法學評論，65，1-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.洪鎌德(20010200)。法律、道德、民主和法治國家的發展--哈伯瑪斯法律觀的析評。哲學與文化，28(2)=321，97-114+189。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.洪鎌德(20010300)。法律、道德、民主和法治國家的發展--哈伯瑪斯法律觀的析評。哲學與文化，28(3)=322，206-217。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Michelman, F.(1986)。Forward: Traces of Self-Government。Harvard Law Review，100，1-77。  new window
34.D'Agostino, F.(1989)。Adjudication as an Epistemological Concept。Synthese，79(2)，231-256。  new window
35.Eskridge, Frickey(1994)。Commentary: The Making of the Legal Process。Harvard Law Review，107，2031。  new window
36.Dworkin, R.(2004)。Hart's Postcript and the Character of Political Philosophy。Oxford Journal of Legal Studies，24(1)，1-37。  new window
37.Leiter, Brian(1996)。Heidegger and the Theory of Adjudication。The Yale Law Journal，106，253-277。  new window
38.Lyons, D.(1999)。Open Texture and the Possibility of Legal Interpretation。Law and Philosophy，18(3)，297-309。  new window
39.Shih, W.(2003)。Reconstruction Blue: A Critique of Habermasian Adjudication Theory。Suffolk University Law Review，36，331。  new window
40.Black, J.(2002)。Regulatory Conversations。Journal of Law and Society，29(1)，163-169。  new window
41.Etzioni, A.(2004)。Symposium: Do Children Have the Same First Amendment Rights as Adults? on Protecting Children from Speech。Chicago-Kent Law Review，79，27。  new window
42.Etzioni, A.(2004)。Symposium: Do Children Have the Same First Amendment Rights as Adults? Response。Chicago-Kent Law Review，79，299。  new window
43.Luban, D.(1998)。Symposium: Rediscovering Fuller's Legal Ethics。Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics，11，801。  new window
44.Farber, Nowak(1984)。The Misleading Nature of Public Forum Analysis: Content and Context in First Amendment Adjudication。Virginia Law Review，70，1219。  new window
45.Orts, E.(1993)。The Positive Law and Systemic Legitimacy: Comment on Hart and Habermas。Ratio Juris，6(3)，245-278。  new window
46.Morawetz, T.(1992)。Understanding Disgreement, the Root Issue of Jurisprudence: Applying Wittgenstein to Positivism, Critical Theory, and Judging。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，141，371。  new window
47.Michelman, Frank(1988)。Law's Republic。Yale Law Journal，97(8)，1493-1537。  new window
會議論文
1.Dreier, T.(1995)。Developments and Perspectives of Copyright: From Gutenberg to Data Highways。KnowRight'95 Conference on Intellectual Property Rights and New Technologies。München, Germany：Wien, Austria：Oldenbourg。31-50。  new window
圖書
1.Alexy, Robert(2002)。The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism。Oxford：Clarendon Press。  new window
2.Benhabib, S.(1985)。Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory。  new window
3.Coleman, J.(2001)。Hart's Postcript, Essays on the Postcript to the Concept of Law。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Honeyball, Walter(1998)。Integrity, Community and Interpretation--A Critial Analysis of Ronald Dworkin's Theory of Law。Ashgate/Dartmouth。  new window
5.Kramer, M.(1999)。In Defense of Legal Posutvism: Law without Trimmings。Oxford：Oxford University Pres。  new window
6.MacCormick, N.(1981)。H.L.A. Hart。London：Edward Arnold。  new window
7.Dworkin, Ronald(1977)。Taking Rights Seriously。London：Gerald Duckworth and Co Ltd.。  new window
8.陳起行(1999)。法形成與法典化--法與資訊研究。學林。  延伸查詢new window
9.Dworkin, Ronald(1986)。Law's Empire。Cambridge, Mass.：Harvard University Press。  new window
10.林立(20020000)。法學方法論與德沃金。臺北：學林文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Habermas, Jürgen、Rehg, William(1996)。Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
12.Rosenberg, Gerald N.(1991)。The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change?。University of Chicago Press。  new window
13.Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus、Bulloch, Penelope A.、Raz, Joseph(1994)。The Concept of Law。Clarendon Press：Oxford University Press。  new window
14.Alexy, Robert、Adler, Ruth、MacCormick, Neil(1989)。A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification。Clarendon Press。  new window
15.Lucy, W.(1999)。Understanding and Explaining Adjudication。Oxford, UK：Oxford University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Fuller, L.(2001)。The Forms and Limits of Adjudication。The Principles of Social Order, Selected Essays of Lon L. Fuller。Oxford：Hart Pubishing。  new window
2.Anderson, D.(1999)。The Failure of American Privacy Law。Protecting Privacy。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Fuller, L.(2001)。Mediation--Its Form and Functions。The Principles of Social Order, Selected Essays of Lon L. Fuller。Oxford：Hart Pubishing。  new window
4.Habermas, J.(1998)。Reply to Symposium Participants, Benjamin N.Cardozo School of Law。Habermas on Law and Democracy。Berkeley, CA：University of California Press。  new window
5.Alexy, R.(1988)。Legal expert systems and legal theory。Expert systems in law: Impacts on legal theory and computer law。Tübingen, Germany：Attempto。  new window
6.Kranich, N.(2001)。Libraries, the Internet and Democracy。Libraries and Democracy: The Cornerstones of Liberty。Chicago, IL：American Library Association。  new window
7.Lucy, W.(2002)。Adjudication。The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law。Oxford, UK：Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Chen, C.(2004)。The Internet as a Forum of Law。Law and Modernity: Particular Problems。Kraków, Poland：Polpress。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1149（臺灣：1141，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2096089 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67888258
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上