The system of dissenting opinion writing originated from Anglo-American law areas has been partially accepted by Germany, Japan, and some international judicial organizations after World War II. In Taiwan, the Justices of Constitutional Court adopted this system at 1958. So far, the decisions of other courts have not implemented that system yet. However, members of the Civil Service Protection and Training Commission can also publish their dissenting opinions in civil service protection cases since 1996. The main questions of this research are to introduce the meaning, nature and functions of the Dissenting Opinions Writing System, to carry on some relevant statistics related to the dissenting opinions of civil service protection cases with SPSS, and to analyze the main different points of view between the majority opinions and the dissenting opinions. This research uses the analytic approach of documents and content analysis method to analyze 88 civil service protection cases which have published dissenting opinions. According to this research, the dissenting opinions of civil service protection cases relatively incline to maintain the rights and interests of public employees rather than to support the decisions of administrative organizations. Based upon the research findings, information and suggestions will be offered to the Civil Service Protection and Training Commission in order to do better jobs in the future and to improve the personnel administration in Taiwan.