:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:比較不同生產方式婦女產後60天內的門診醫療利用
書刊名:臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者:陳楚杰 引用關係劉得泰王本仁 引用關係陳靖宜張琇珺
作者(外文):Chen, Chu-chiehLiu, Te-taiWang, Pen-jenChen, Chin-yiChang, Hsiu-chun
出版日期:2009
卷期:28:1
頁次:頁16-25
主題關鍵詞:生產方式產後醫療利用Delivery methodPostpartumMedical utilization
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:79
目標:本研究旨在比較不同生產方式婦女產後60天內的門診醫療利用。方法:本研究材料來自國家衛生研究院發行之20萬人全民健康保險承保抽樣歸人檔於1996-2003年之申報資料,以4,995位產婦為研究對象,並採用二部模型對產後有就醫的產婦進行分析,比較不同生產方式婦女產後60天內的門診醫療利用。結果:剖腹產婦女產後60天內有就醫者的平均門診就醫次數及門診就醫費用均高於自然產婦女,且平均門診就醫間隔天數則比自然產婦女短。結論:剖腹產可能會增加產後60天內門診醫療利用。
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the mode of delivery and utilization of ambulatory care by women at 60-days postpartum. Methods: Claims data between 1996 and 2003 for a representative sample of 200,000 people randomly selected from all beneficiaries enrolled in Taiwan's NHI program in 2000 were analyzed. A total of 4,995 women were included to estimate ambulatory care utilization 60-days postpartum with the different modes of delivery using a two part model. Results: Women at 60-days postpartum with Caesarean delivery had higher average numbers of outpatient visits and expenditures with shorter intervals between visits, than women with vaginal births. Conclusions: The findings indicated that ambulatory care utilization may increase among women with Caesarean delivery at 60-days postpartum.
期刊論文
1.羅紀琼(20030400)。良辰吉時與剖腹生產。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,22(2),134-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Andersen, Ronald M.(1995)。Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter?。Journal of Health and Social Behavior,36(1),1-10。  new window
3.黃俊元、楊銘欽、陳維昭(19970800)。產婦特性與採用剖腹產:以臺大醫院為例。中華公共衛生雜誌,16(4),309-318。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Liu S, Heaman M, Joseph KS, et al.(2005)。Risk of maternal postpartum readmission associated with mode of delivery。Obstet Gynecol,105,836-42。  new window
5.Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Martin DP, EasterlingTR.(2000)。Association between method of delivery and maternal re-hospitalization。JAMA,283,2411-6。  new window
6.Webb DA, Robbins JM.(2003)。Mode of delivery and risk of postpartum rehospitalization。JAMA,289,46-7。  new window
7.Hemminki E, Shelley J, Gissler M.(2005)。Mode of delivery and problems in subsequent births: a register based study from Finland。Am J Obstet Gynecol,193,169-77。  new window
8.Allen VM, O’Connell CM, Farrell SA, Baskett TF(2005)。Economic implications of method of delivery。Am J Obstet Gynecol,193,192-7。  new window
9.Petrou S, Henderson J, Glazener C.(2001)。Economic aspects of caesarean section and alternative modes of delivery。Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol,15,145-63。  new window
10.Madlon-Kay DJ, DeFor TA.(2005)。Maternal postpartum health care utilization and the effect of Minnesota early discharge legislation。J Am Board Fam Pra,18,307-11。  new window
11.Meikle S F, Lyons E, Hulac P, Orleans M.(1998)。Rehospitalizations and outpatient contacts of mothers and neonates after hospital discharge after vaginal delivery。Am J Obstet Gynecol,179,166-71。  new window
學位論文
1.趙天麗(1996)。剖腹產之費用結構、醫療因素與非醫療因素之相關研究-以某醫學中心為例,台中市。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳怡秀(1996)。自然生產論病例計酬制對醫療資源耗用之影響-以三家醫學中心為例,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾億郎(1999)。全民健保「論病例計酬制」實施對剖腹產醫療資源耗用影響之研究,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
4.徐美菁(1998)。台北巿孕婦生產住院日型態與其出院後醫療健康照護利用之相關研究,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張珏(2003)。婦女與健康初版。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Stephenson P.(1992)。International Differences in the Use of Obstetrical Interventions。Copenhagen。  new window
3.蘇純閨(2000)。產科學(上冊)初版。台北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE