:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:加倍自然產支付能否降低剖腹產比例?
書刊名:臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者:韓幸紋 引用關係連賢明 引用關係
作者(外文):Han, Hsing-wenLien, Hsien-ming
出版日期:2010
卷期:29:3
頁次:頁218-227
主題關鍵詞:剖腹產支付標準誘發性需求Cesarean sectionMedical paymentInduced demand
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:27
  • 點閱點閱:79
期刊論文
1.駱明慶(20071200)。臺灣總生育率下降的表象與實際。研究臺灣,3,37-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Gruber, J.、Owings, M.(1996)。Physician financial incentives and cesarean section delivery。Rand Journal of Economics,27,99-123。  new window
3.陳杰峰、邱文達(20080700)。實證醫學之知識轉譯地圖。臺灣醫學,12(4),455-460。  延伸查詢new window
4.Brown, H. S., III(1996)。Physician Demand for Leisure: Implications for Cesarean Section Rates。Journal of Health Economics,15,233-242。  new window
5.Chou, Y. J.、Huang, N.、Lin, I. F.(2006)。Do physicians and their relatives have a decreased rate of cesarean section? A 4-year population-based study in Taiwan。Birth,33,195-202。  new window
6.Dubay L.、Kaestner R.、Waidmann T.(1999)。The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates。J Health Econ,18,491-522。  new window
7.羅紀琼(20030400)。良辰吉時與剖腹生產。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,22(2),134-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Gruber J, Kim J, Mayzlin D.(1999)。Physician fee and procedure intensity: the case of cesarean delivery。J Health Econ,18,473-90。  new window
9.Grant D.(2009)。Physician financial incentives and cesarean delivery: new conclusions from the healthcare cost and utilization project。J Health Econ,28,244-50。  new window
10.Rice T.(1983)。The impact of changing medicare reimbursement rates on physician-induced demand。Med Care,21,803-15。  new window
11.Stafford RS.(1990)。Cesarean section use and source of payment: analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts。Am J Public Health,80,313-5。  new window
12.Keeler E, Fok T.(1996)。Equalizing physician fees had little effect on cesarean rates。Med Care Res Rev,53,465-71。  new window
13.Tsai YW, Hu TW.(2002)。National health insurance, physician financial incentives, and primary cesarean deliveries in Taiwan。Am J of Public Health,92,1514-7。  new window
14.蔡雅慧、黃國哲、宋永魁(2006)。實施「前胎剖腹產之陰道生產」論病例計酬對醫師執行剖腹產後自然產之影響。台灣衛誌,25,283-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.立法院(2007)。立法院公報委員會記錄。立法院公報,96,239-41。  延伸查詢new window
16.Lo JC.(2008)。Financial incentives do not always work-anexample of cesarean sections in Taiwan。Health Policy,88,121-9。  new window
17.鍾聿琳(1998)。產科照護之再省思—由減少剖腹產談。護理雜誌,45,61-5。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Toffel SM, Placek PJ, Liss T.(1980)。Trends in the United States cesarean section rates and reasons for the 1980-85 rise。Am J Public Health,77,955-9。  new window
19.Spetz J, Smith MW, Ennis SF.(2001)。Physician incentives and the timing of cesarean sections: evidence from California。Med Care,39,536-50。  new window
20.Burns L, Geller S, Wholey D.(1995)。The effect of physician factors on the cesarean section decision。Med Care,33,365-82。  new window
21.Murray S.(2000)。Relation between private health insurance and high rates of cesarean section in Chile: qualitative and quantitative study。Br Med J,321,1501-5。  new window
22.Lin HC, Xirasagar S, Tung YC.(2006)。Impact of a cultural belief about ghost month on delivery mode in Taiwan。J Epidemiol Community Health,60,522-6。  new window
23.黃俊哲、黃光華、鍾信成、蘇燕雲、楊長興(2008)。知情消費者與機構所在地區對剖腹生產醫療利用之探討。澄清醫護管理雜誌,4,24-33。  延伸查詢new window
24.Baicker K, Buckles KS, Chandra A.(2006)。Geographic variation in the appropriate use of cesarean delivery。Health Aff,25,355-67。  new window
25.Mitler LK, Rizzo JA, Horwitz SM.(2000)。Physician gender and cesarean sections。J Clin Epidemiol,53,1030-5。  new window
26.Ghetti C Chan BK Guise JM.(2004)。Physicians' responses to patient-requested cesarean delivery。Birth,31,280-4。  new window
27.Lin HC, Xirasagar S.(2005)。Maternal age and the likelihood of a maternal request for cesarean delivery: a 5-year population-based study。Am J Obstet Gynecol,192,848-55。  new window
28.Hsu KH Liao PJ Hwang CJ.(2008)。Factors affecting Taiwanese women’s choice of cesarean section。Soc Sci Med,66,201-9。  new window
29.黃俊元、楊銘欽、陳維昭(1997)。產婦特性與採用剖腹產:以台大醫院為例。中華衛誌,16,309-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.Henry OA, Kimberly DG, Calvin JH, Lawrence DP.(1995)。Using ICD-9 codes to identify indications for primary and repeat cesarean sections: agreement with clinical records。Am J Pub Health,85,1143-5。  new window
31.Gregory KD, Korst LM, Gornbein JA, Platt LD.(2002)。Using administrative data to identify indications for elective primary cesarean delivery。Health Serv Res,37,1387-401。  new window
32.Epstein AJ, Nicholson S.(2009)。The formation and evolution of physician treatment styles: an application to cesarean sections。J Health Econ,28,1126-40。  new window
33.Kessler DP, McClellan MB.(1996)。Do doctors practice defensive medicine?。Q J Econ,111,353-90。  new window
34.Tussing AD, Wojtowycz MA.(1997)。Malpractice, defensive medicine, and obstetric behavior。Med Care,35,172-91。  new window
35.Rock SM.(1988)。Malpractice premiums and primary cesarean section rates in New York and Illinois。Public Health Rep,103,459-63。  new window
36.Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM, et al.(2005)。Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment。JAMA,293,2609-17。  new window
37.羅紀琼、劉素芬(2004)。院所競爭對醫療處置之影響—以剖腹產為例。台灣衛誌,23,71-9。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.Lo JC.(2003)。Patients’ attitudes vs. physicians’ determination:implications for cesarean sections。Soc Sci Med,57,91-6。  new window
39.Liu CN Yang MC.(2003)。Rethinking “woman’s choice” of cesarean delivery。Am J Public Health,93,1036-7。  new window
40.Burns L, Geller S, Wholey D.(1995)。The effect of physician factors on the cesarean section decision。Med Care,33,365-82。  new window
會議論文
1.楊哲銘(2000)。TQIP區域性資料報告。台北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.徐金源(2004)。降低不必要的剖腹產策略建議。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.古智愷(2002)。醫師與醫院管理者對剖腹產管理指標認知、態度及行為之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃俊元(1995)。影響剖腹產利用之相關因素探討:以某醫學中心為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學管理學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.林阿明(2006)。健保調高自然產給付對剖腹產率之影響研究,台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃源甫(2004)。台灣醫院績效評估及管理,新竹。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳志忠(2006)。懷孕期間身體質量指數變化與初次非計畫性剖腹生產風險之相關性研究,台北。  延伸查詢new window
6.嚴庚辰(2008)。論醫療糾紛之民事損害賠償-以產科上肩難產醫師之民事損害賠償責任為中心,雲林。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.吳嘉苓(2000)。產科醫生遇上迷信婦女?台灣高剖腹產率論述的性別、知識與權力。性/別政治與主體形構。台北:麥田。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE