:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Assimilation and Rising Taiwanese Identity: Taiwan-born Immigrants in the United States, 1990-2000
書刊名:人口學刊
作者:宇宙姜蘭虹 引用關係
作者(外文):Yu, ZhouChiang, Nora Lan-hung
出版日期:2009
卷期:38
頁次:頁115-160
主題關鍵詞:臺灣認同臺灣出生的移民華裔同化理論雙世代法Taiwanese identityTaiwan-born immigrantsEthnic ChineseAssimilation theoryDouble-cohort method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:37
中文摘要 本文探討1990 年至2000 年間美國的人口普查中,為何有越來越 高比率移居美國的台灣出生移民認為自己是台灣人而不是華裔(ethnic Chinese)。此一趨勢似乎不符合同化理論(assimilation theory),其 主張當族裔群體在美國的時間越長,會使其更加脫離原本的族群政治 和身份認同。本研究所採用的雙世代法(double cohort method)使我 們能夠將時代效應(period effect)從期間效應(duration effect)中分 開出來討論,而時代效應在分析變化上較具有鑑別性。本研究結果發 現其中有很明顯的時間差異和地區變異。臺灣出生移民之中,老一輩 的、初到美國的、以及住在洛杉磯地區的移民,較傾向於認為自己是 台灣人而非華裔。相反地,台灣出生移民之中,具有較佳之英語能 力、較低教育程度,以及與來自中國大陸的華裔人士比鄰而居者,則 較不傾向於此身份認同。 此外,移入時的年紀是身份認同之形塑與轉變的重要關鍵,在年 輕時就移入美國的移民,認同自我身份為台灣人的傾向最低。隨著時 間的推移,台灣出生移民的涵化程度確實加深了。在1970 年代以前 抵達美國的年輕移民,最不可能在1990 年至2000 年間普查填表時從 華裔轉換成台灣人。然而,涵化作用並不會阻止移民在填寫的普查表 格上展現其對台灣身份的認同。對於這些台灣出生的移民來說,在普 查表格上表示其台灣認同,似乎是一種「反叛」或「覺醒」的行動, 象徵著自己對台灣同胞的支持,而此種行動深受台灣人意識抬頭的影響。全球化可能會使移民和其原居地保持前所未有的密切連繫,特別 是在危機時期。
Abstract This study examines why a growing percentage of Taiwan-born immigrants in the U.S. have identified themselves as Taiwanese rather than ethnic Chinese in the U.S. decennial censuses between 1990 and 2000. The trend appears inconsistent with the assimilation theory, which postulates that ethnic groups will become more detached from ethnic politics and identity the longer they stay in the United States. The application of a double cohort method enables us to separate the period effect from the duration effect, which is critical to analyzing the changes. Results show sharp temporal differentiation and large geographical variation. The older generation of Taiwanese immigrants and recent arrivals to the United States, as well as those who live in Los Angeles, are the most likely to regard themselves as Taiwanese rather than ethnic Chinese. In contrast, Taiwanborn immigrants who have greater English proficiency, who have less education, and who have [mainland] Chinese as their neighbors are less likely to do so. Moreover, age-at-arrival is a key determinant in identity formation and change. Those who came to the U.S. when they were young are least likely to regard themselves as Taiwanese. Over time, Taiwan-born immigrants have indeed become more acculturated. Young Taiwan-born immigrants who came to the U.S. before the 1970s are least likely to make a switch to Taiwanese during the period. However, acculturation alone does not prevent one from claiming Taiwanese identity on the census form. For Taiwan-born immigrants, writing in Taiwanese on the census form appears to be a "rebellious" or "awakening" act and a symbolic expression of solidarity with their compatriots in Taiwan, empowered by a growing sense of Taiwanese consciousness. Globalizationmay now have allowed immigrants to maintain a closer tie with their country of origin than before, especially in times of crisis.
期刊論文
1.Xie, Y.、Goyette, K.(1997)。The Racial Identification of Biracial Children with One Asian Parent: Evidence from the 1990 Census。Social Forces,76(2),547-570。  new window
2.Yu, Taifa(1999)。Relations between Taiwan and China after the Missile Crisis: Toward Reconciliation?。Pacific Affairs,72(1),39-56。  new window
3.Tseng, Y. F.(1995)。Beyond 'Little Taipei': The Development of Taiwanese Immigrant Businesses in Los Angeles。International Migration Review,29(1),33-59。  new window
4.Portes, A.、Zhou, M.(1993)。The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants。The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,530(1),74-96。  new window
5.Huang, Chi(2005)。Dimensions of Taiwanese/Chinese identity and national identity in Taiwan: a latent class analysis。Journal of Asian and African Studies,40(1/2),51-70。  new window
6.Okamura, Jonathan Y.(1981)。Situational ethnicity。Ethnic and Racial Studies,4(4),452-465。  new window
7.Yinger, J. Milton(1985)。Ethnicity。Annual Review of Sociology,11,151-180。  new window
8.Ryder, N. B.(1965)。The Cohort As A Concept in the Study of Social Change。American Sociological Review,30(6),843-861。  new window
9.Gans, Herbert J.(1979)。Symbolic Ethnicity: The Future of Ethnic Groups and Cultures in America。Ethnic and Racial Studies,2(1),1-20。  new window
10.Sutter, Robert(20020600)。The Bush Administration and U.S. China Policy Debate--Reasons for Optimism。Issues & Studies,38(2),1-30。new window  new window
11.王德育、張光華(20051200)。Ethnicity and Politics in Taiwan: An Analysis of Mainlanders' Identity and Policy Preference。Issues & Studies,41(4),35-66。new window  new window
12.Liu, I-chou、Ho, Szu-yin(19990500)。The Taiwanese/Chinese Identity of the Taiwan People。Issues & Studies,35(3),1-34。new window  new window
13.Tseng, Yen-fen(2000)。The Mobility of Entrepreneurs and Capital: Taiwanese Capital-Linked Migration。International Migration,38(2),143-168。  new window
14.Ambrosio, T. ed.(2002)。Ethnic identity groups and U.S. foreign policy. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Alba, R. D. and J. R. Logan. 1992. 'Assimilation and Stratification in theHomeownership Patterns of Racial and Ethnic Groups。International Migration Review,26(4):,1314-1341。  new window
15.Allen, J. P. and E. J. Turner.(1996)。Spatial Patterns of Immigrant Assimilation。Professional Geographer,48(2):,140-155。  new window
16.Allio, F.(2000)。The Dynamics of the Identity Issue in Taiwan Understanding Uniqueness, Diversity and the Whole.'。China Perspectives,28:,43-50。  new window
17.Avenarius, C.(2007)。Cooperation, Conflict and Integration among Sub-Ethnic Immigrant Groups from Taiwan.'。Population, Space and Place,13(2),95-112。  new window
18.Baum, J. and A. Sherry.(1999)。Identity Crisis'。Far Eastern Economic Review,162:,21-23。  new window
19.Carliner, G.(2000)。The Language Ability of U.S. Immigrants: Assimilation and Cohort Effects。International Migration Review,34(1):,158-182。  new window
20.Duncan, O. D. and S. Lieberson.(1959)。Ethnic Segregation and Assimilation。American Journal of Sociology,64(4),364-374。  new window
21.Ellis,M. and R.Wright.(1998)。When Immigrants Are Not Migrants: Counting Arrivals of the Foreign Born Using the U.S. Census.'。International Migration Review,32(1):,127-144。  new window
22.Eschbach, K. and C. Gomez.(1998)。Choosing Hispanic Identity: Ethnic Identity Switching among Respondents to High School and Beyond.'。Social Science Quarterly,79(1):,74-90。  new window
23.Farley, R.(1991)。The New Census Question About Ancestry: What Did It Tell Us。Demography,28(3):,411-429。  new window
24.Kuo,W. H.(1997)。Democratization and the Political Economy of Taiwan.'。International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society,11(1),5-24。  new window
25.Lieberson, S.(1965)。Bilingualism in Montreal: A Demographic Analysis.'。American Journal of Sociology,71(1):,10-25。  new window
26.Lieberson, Stanley(1985)。Unhyphenated Whites in the United States。Ethnic and Racial Studies,8(1),159-180。  new window
27.Lieberson, S. and M. C. Waters.(1993)。The Ethnic Responses of Whites: What Causes Their Instability, Simplification, and Inconsistency.'。Social Forces,72(2):,421-450。  new window
28.Lin, C. L. and B. Tedards.(2002)。Lee Teng-Hui: Transformational Leadershipin Taiwan's Transition.'。American Asian Review,20(2):,75-122。  new window
29.Lin, C. K. P.(2006)。Taiwan's Overseas Opposition Movement and Grassroots Diplomacy in the United States: The Case of the Formosan Associationfor Public Affairs.'。Journal of Contemporary China,15(46),133-159。  new window
30.Marsh, Robert M.(2000)。Taiwan's Future National Identity: Attitudes and Geopolitical Constraints。International Journal of Comparative Sociology,41(3/4),299-314。  new window
31.Martin, B. L.(1991)。From Negro to Black to African-American: The Powerof Names and Naming.'。Political Science Quarterly,106(1):,83-107。  new window
32.Meisner, M.(1963)。The Development of Formosan Nationalism。.' The China Quarterly,15,91-106。  new window
33.Myers, D. and S. W. Lee.(1996)。Immigration Cohorts and Residential Overcrowding in Southern California.'。Demography,33(1):,51-65。  new window
34.Myers, D. and S. W. Lee.(1998)。Immigrant Trajectories into Homeownership:A Temporal Analysis of Residential Assimilation.'。International Migration Review,32(3):,593-625。  new window
35.Nagata, J. A.(1974)。What Is a Malay? Situational Selection of Ethnic Identityin a Plural Society。American Ethnologist,1(2):,331-350。  new window
36.Qian, Z. C.(2004)。Options: Racial/Ethnic Identification of Children of Intermarried Couples.'。Social Science Quarterly,85(3):,746-766。  new window
37.Rigger, S.(1997)。'Competing Conceptions of Taiwan's Identity: The Irresolvable Conflict in Cross-Strait Relations.'。Journal of Contemporary China,6(15):,307-319。  new window
38.Rigger, S.(2000)。'Taiwan's Turnaround.'。Current History .,99(638),280-284。  new window
39.Ryder, N. B.(1955)。'The Interpretation of Origin Statistics.'。Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science,21(4):,466-479。  new window
40.Shain, Y.(1994)。Ethnic Diasporas and United States Foreign Policy.'。Political Science Quarterly,109(5):,811-841。  new window
41.Smith, T. W.(1992)。'Changing Racial Labels: From Colored to Negro to Black to African-American.'。Public Opinion Quarterly,56(4):,496-514。  new window
42.Stephan, C. W. and W. G. Stephan.(2000)。'The Measurement of Racial and Ethnic Identity.'。International Journal of Intercultural Relations,24(5):,541-552。  new window
43.Wang, F. C.(2005)。From Chinese Original Domicile to Taiwanese Ethnicity:An Analysis of Census Category Transformation in Taiwan。Taiwanese Sociology,9:,59-117。  new window
44.Wang, T. Y.(2000)。One China, One Taiwan': An Analysis of the Democratic Progressive Party's China Policy.'。Journal of Asian and African Studies,35(1):,159-182。  new window
45.White, M. J., A. E. Biddlecom, and S. Guo.(1993)。'Immigration, Naturalization, and Residential Assimilation among Asian Americans in 1980。Social Forces,72(1):,93-117。  new window
46.Wu, N. T.(2005)。Romance and Bread: A Preliminary Study of the Identity Change in Taiwan.'。Taiwan Political Science Review,9(2),5-39。  new window
47.Wu, Y. S.(2001)。Liang' an Guanxi Zhong De Zhongguo Yishi Yu Taiwan Yishi (The Chinese/Taiwanese Identity in Cross-Straits Relations).'。China Affairs Quarterly,4:,71-89。  new window
48.Yu, Z.(2006)。A Different Path to Homeownership: The Case of Taiwanese Immigrants in Los Angeles.'。Housing Studies,21(4):,555-584。  new window
會議論文
1.Massey, D. S. and I. Redstone.(2003)。Coming to Stay: An Analysis of the U.S. Census Question on Year of Arrival。Minneapolis,。  new window
研究報告
1.Fisher, G. M.(1992)。The Development of the Orshansky Poverty Thresholds and Their Subsequent History as the Official U.S. Poverty Measure.。  new window
2.Myers, D.(2004)。Cohorts and Socioeconomic Progress。New York City and Washington DC。  new window
3.Overseas Chinese Affairs Commission.(2002)。Estimation of the Overseas Chinese Population from Taiwan, Mainland China, and Hong Kong-Theory and Experiment.。Taipei, R.O.C.,。  new window
4.Overseas Compatriot Affairs Commission.(2006)。Qualitative Research of Adaptation and Development of Taiwanese Immigrants in Los Angeles。Taipei, R.O.C.:。  new window
5.Ruggles, S., M. Sobek, T. Alexander, C. A. Fitch, R. Goeken, P. K. Hall, M.King, and C. Ronnander.(2003)。Integrated Public Use Microdata Series:Version 3。Minneapolis, MN。  new window
6.U.S. Census Bureau.(2003)。Census 2000, Public Use Microdata Sample, (PUMS), United States.。Washington D.C。  new window
圖書
1.Chen, Hsiang-shui(1992)。Chinatown No More: Taiwan Immigrants in Contemporary New York。Ithaca, N.Y.:Cornell University Press。  new window
2.Alba, R. D.、Nee, V.(2003)。Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Sharman, Lyon(1934)。Sun Yat-Sen, His Life and Its Meaning: a Critical Biography。New York:John Day。  new window
4.Shain, Yossi(1999)。Marketing the American Creed Abroad: Diasporas in the U.S. and Their Homelands。Cambridge, UK; New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Phillips, Steven E.(2003)。Between Assimilation and Independence: The Taiwanese Encounter Nationalist China, 1945-1950。Stanford, Calif.:Stanford University Press。  new window
6.Alba, Richard D.(1990)。Ethnic Identity: the transformation of white America。New Haven, CT:Yale University Press。  new window
7.Lien, Pei-te、Conway, M. Margaret、Wong, Janelle(2004)。The Politics of Asian Americans: Diversity and Community。New York:Routledge。  new window
8.Wachman, Alan M.(1994)。Taiwan: National Identity and Democratization。M. E. Sharpe。  new window
9.Waters, Mary C.(1990)。Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America。University of California Press。  new window
10.Brown, Melissa J.(2004)。Is Taiwan Chinese? The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities。University of California Press。  new window
11.Gordon, Milton Myron(1964)。Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins。Oxford University Press。  new window
12.Barth, Fredrik(1998)。Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference。Long Grove, IL:Waveland Press。  new window
13.Bell, D.(1975)。Ethnicity and Social Change。Ethnicity:Theory and Experience。Cambridge,Mass。  new window
14.Gans, H. J.(1982)。The Urban Villagers: Group and Class in the Life of Italian-Americans。New York:The Free Press。  new window
15.Geertz, C.(1963)。'The Integrative Revolution。Old Societiesand New States; the Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa。New York,。  new window
16.Glazer, N. and D. P. Moynihan.(1975)。Introduction。Ethnicity:Theory and Experience。Cambridge。  new window
17.Holdaway, J.(2007)。China: Outside the People's Republic of China。The New Americans : A Guide to Immigration since 1965。Cambridge, Mass.:。  new window
18.Hung, A.(2004)。Rising Taiwan Identity Helps Chen's Party in Poll. Reuters.Isaacs, H. R. 1975 . 'Basic Group Identity: The Idols of the Tribe。Ethnicity: Theory and Experience,。Cambridge, Mass。  new window
19.Kertzer, D. I. andD.Arel.(2002)。Census and Identity: The Politics of Race, Ethnicity, and Language in National Census。Cambridge, UK; New York,。  new window
20.Lieberson, S.(1963)。Ethnic Patterns in American Cities。Glencoe, IL:。  new window
21.Marquand, R. M.(2004)。Tug-of-War for Taiwan's Identity。Boston。  new window
22.Marsh, R. M.(2002)。National Identity and Ethnicity in Taiwan: Some Trendsin the 1990s.'。Memories of the Future: NationalIdentity Issues and the Search for a New Taiwan。NY; London。  new window
23.Ministry of Interior.(2002)。Taiwan Demographic Fact Book。Taipe:。  new window
24.U.S. Department of Homeland Security.(2008)。Yearbook of Immigration Statistics: 2007。Washington, D.C.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Williams, J. F.(2003)。Who are the Taiwanese? Taiwan in the Chinese diaspora。The Chinese diaspora: Space, place, mobility, and identity。New York:Rowan & Littlefield。  new window
2.Portes, Alejandro(1995)。Economic Sociology and the Sociology of Immigration: A Conceptual Overview。The Economic Sociology of Immigration: Essays on Networks, Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship。New York, NY:Russell Sage Foundation。  new window
3.Barth, F.(2000)。Boundaries and Connections。Signifying Identities: Anthropological Perspectives on Boundaries and Contested Values。London:Routledge。  new window
4.Corcuff, S.(2002)。Taiwan's 'Mainlanders', New Taiwanese?。Memories of the Future: National Identity Issues and the Search for a New Taiwan。Armonk, NY:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
5.Greeley, A. M.(1974)。Ethnicity in the United States: A Preliminary Reconnaissance。Wiley Series in Urban Research。New York:Wiley。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE