:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:打破維持現狀的迷思:臺灣民眾統獨抉擇中理念與務實的兩難
書刊名:臺灣政治學刊
作者:耿曙劉嘉薇 引用關係陳陸輝
作者(外文):Keng, ShuLiu, Jia-weiChen, Lu-huei
出版日期:2009
卷期:13:2
頁次:頁3-56
主題關鍵詞:臺灣政治兩岸關係統獨議題民意調查理性抉擇象徵政治Taiwanese politicsCross-strait relationsUnification-independence issuePublic opinionRational choiceSymbolic politics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(27) 博士論文(4) 專書(2) 專書論文(3)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:27
  • 共同引用共同引用:1354
  • 點閱點閱:189
本研究主要聚焦者,在針對目前最廣爲接受的「統獨偏好六分類測量」中,每每超過六成民眾所偏好的「維持現狀」選項。作者試圖納入吳乃德所發展的「現實條件」,就傾向「維持現狀」者進行分解,析離其中「務實考量」的成份,根據其終極價值,建構一個基於「純粹理念」的統獨度量,並據此觀察台灣民眾的立場分佈。根據作者看法,統獨抉擇的分歧不只在趨統、趨獨的方向立場上,同時也反映爲是否具有「務實轉圓」的強度層面。基於上述認識,作者進一步探討不同身份特徵的台灣民眾,各基於何種考量,捨棄其統獨理念,轉趨於務實選項?基於上述目的,本文分爲下列五個部分。接續的第二節,將探討「統獨抉擇」的本質以及統獨度量的爭議。第三節將介紹本文邏輯,並據此發展出一個純粹基於「理念」的度量架構,再根據新度量來觀察台灣民眾「統獨理念」的分佈。緊隨其後的第四節,則將進一步分析台灣民眾傾向務實的緣由,並據此提出「戰爭風險」與「磨合成本」兩類考量,並各就台灣不同身份特徵的民眾,分析其轉趨務實選項的可能。最後的結論中,作者除總括本研究發現外,並期待學界針對「理念」與「務實」兩者的結構與動態進行研究,藉由其變化軌跡,蠡測兩岸的未來。
The position of the Taiwanese people over unification-independence issue assumes enormous practical importance and at the same time attracts numerous scholarly debates. The primary concern of these debates is how to clarify the issue entangled with "principles" and "pragmatism" and then uncover the genuine preferences of the Taiwanese people. For the purpose, lots of measurements have been developed and evaluated. The focus of the paper is those who prefer "status-quo" in the traditional unification-independence measurement. As our interviews suggest, the "status-quo" for many Taiwanese is more often a practical choice without enough alternatives than an expression of preference without substantial constraints. Given such understanding, the study thus introduces Wu's "conditional questions" to help separate people's preference from practicality. With both "genuine preferences" and "practical choice" at hand, the paper goes on to find out who persistently uphold their principles and who else withdraw and stay with a more practical "status-quo".
期刊論文
1.林繼文(20020500)。Electoral System, Voter Preferences, and The Fragmentation of Party System: The East Asian Cases。選舉研究,9(1),137-168。new window  new window
2.盛治仁(20011100)。即時資訊處理模型與投票行為研究的運用--以美國選民投票行為分析為例。選舉研究,8(2),31-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.翁秀琪、陳慧敏(20000700)。社會結構、語言機制與認同建構--大眾媒介如何「編織」美麗島事件並構塑民眾的族群與國家認同。傳播研究集刊,4,0+0_1-0_4+1-162。  延伸查詢new window
4.朱雲漢、林繼文(2001)。Political development in 20th-century Taiwan: State-building, regime transformation and the construction of national identity。The China Quarterly,165,102-129。  new window
5.Frauenfelder, M.(20011209)。Social Norms Marketing。New York Time Magazine,100。  new window
6.Chang, Mau-kuei(2005)。Taiwan's Nationalistic Politics and Its Difficult 'Status Quo'。The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies,21,91-124。  new window
7.黃智聰、程小綾(20051100)。經濟投票與政黨輪替--以臺灣縣市長選舉為例。選舉研究,12(2),45-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Hsieh, John Fuh-Sheng、Niou, Emerson M. S.(2005)。Measuring Taiwanese Public Opinion on Taiwanese Independence。China Quarterly,181,158-168。  new window
9.Lin, Tse-min、Chu, Yun-han、Hinich, Melvin J.(199607)。Conflict Displacement and Regime Transition in Taiwan: A Spatial Analysis。World Politics,48(4),453-482。  new window
10.Yu, Ching-hsin(2005)。The Evolving Party System in Taiwan, 1995-2004。Journal of Asian and African Studies,40(1/2),105-123。  new window
11.王德育、劉義周(2004)。Contending Identities in Taiwan: Implications for Cross- Strait Relations。Asian Survey,44(4),568-590。  new window
12.陳陸輝、耿曙(20080300)。政治效能感與政黨認同對選民投票抉擇的影響--以2002年北高市長選舉為例。臺灣民主,5(1),87-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Wu, Yu-Shan(200407)。Taiwanese Nationalism and Its Implications: Testing the Worst-Case Scenario。Asian Survey,44(4),614-625。  new window
14.王甫昌(20080600)。族群政治議題在臺灣民主化轉型中的角色。臺灣民主季刊,5(2),89-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Kahneman, D.、Tversky, A.(1979)。Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk。Econometrica,47(2),263-291。  new window
16.翁秀琪(20010700)。集體記憶與認同構塑--以美麗島事件為例。新聞學研究,68,117-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.陳陸輝、鄭夙芬(20031100)。訪問時使用的語言與民眾政治態度間關聯性之研究。選舉研究,10(2),135-158。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.王柏燿(20040500)。經濟評估與投票抉擇:以2001年立委選舉為例。選舉研究,11(1),171-195。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.吳乃德(19950400)。社會分歧和政黨競爭--解釋國民黨為何繼續執政。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,78,101-130。  延伸查詢new window
20.陳文俊(19951100)。統獨議題與選民的投票行為--民國八十三年省市長選舉之分析。選舉研究,2(2),99-136。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.陳陸輝(20001100)。臺灣選民政黨認同的持續與變遷。選舉研究,7(2),109-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.黃秀端(20081200)。政治權力與集體記憶的競逐--從報紙之報導來看對二二八的詮釋。臺灣民主季刊,5(4),129-180。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.張佑宗、趙珮如(20060600)。社會脈絡、個人網絡與臺灣2004年立法委員選舉選民的投票抉擇。臺灣民主季刊,3(2),1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.陳陸輝、周應龍(20040700)。臺灣民眾統獨立場的持續與變遷。東亞研究,35(2),143-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.盛治仁(20020300)。Cross-Strait Relations and Public Opinion on Taiwan。Issues & Studies,38(1),17-46。new window  new window
26.耿曙、陳陸輝、黃冠博(20061200)。Sense, Sensitivity, and Sophistication in Shaping the Future of Cross-Strait Relations。Issues & Studies,42(4),23-66。new window  new window
27.吳玉山(20014004)。兩岸關係中的中國意識與臺灣意識。中國事務,4,71-89。  延伸查詢new window
28.徐火炎(20041100)。臺灣結、中國結與臺灣心、中國情:臺灣選舉中的符號政治。選舉研究,11(2),1-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.吳乃德(19931100)。國家認同和政黨支持--臺灣政黨競爭的社會基礎。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,74,33-61。  延伸查詢new window
30.陳文俊(20030500)。藍與綠--臺灣選民的政治意識型態初探。選舉研究,10(1),41-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.黃囇莉(20071200)。M型政黨vs.鐘型意識--臺灣國族認同之意識型態及其心理基礎。中華心理學刊,49(4),451-470。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.盛杏湲(20020500)。統獨議題與臺灣選民的投票行為:一九九〇年代的分析。選舉研究,9(1),41-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.吳乃德(20051200)。麵包與愛情:初探臺灣民眾民族認同的變動。臺灣政治學刊,9(2),5-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.吳乃德(19960700)。自由主義和族群認同:搜尋臺灣民族主義的意識形態基礎。臺灣政治學刊,1,5-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.劉從葦(20061200)。臺灣政黨的政策位置:非介入式與介入式測量的比較研究。臺灣政治學刊,10(2),3-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.張茂桂、吳忻怡(19971200)。教育對於統獨傾向的作用。臺灣政治學刊,2,107-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.杜素豪、廖培珊(20071200)。態度量表的回答模式:以外來人口影響與兩岸統合兩題組為例。臺灣政治學刊,11(2),3-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.張佑宗(20060300)。選舉事件與選民的投票抉擇:以臺灣2004年總統選舉為分析對象。東吳政治學報,22,121-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.吳重禮、許文賓(20030600)。誰是政黨認同者與獨立選民?--以二〇〇一年臺灣地區選民政黨認同的決定因素為例。政治科學論叢,18,101-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.陳義彥、陳陸輝(20030900)。模稜兩可的態度還是不確定的未來:臺灣民眾統獨觀的解析。中國大陸研究,46(5),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.耿曙、陳陸輝(20031100)。兩岸經貿互動與臺灣政治版圖:南北區塊差異的推手?。問題與研究,42(6),1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.Liu, I-chou、Ho, Szu-yin(19990500)。The Taiwanese/Chinese Identity of the Taiwan People。Issues & Studies,35(3),1-34。new window  new window
43.蔡佳泓、王鼎銘、Tossutti, Livianna S.(20081200)。Between Independence and Unification: An Ordered Probit Analysis of Panel Survey Data on Taiwan's Constitutional Future。Issues & Studies,44(4),71-98。new window  new window
44.蔡佳泓、徐永明、黃琇庭(20070500)。兩極化政治:解釋臺灣2004總統大選。選舉研究,14(1),1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.盛杏湲、陳義彥(20030500)。政治分歧與政黨競爭:二○○一年立法委員選舉的分析。選舉研究,10(1),7-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
46.游清鑫(20021100)。政黨認同與政黨形象--面訪與焦點團體訪談的結合。選舉研究,9(2),85-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
47.林佳龍(19890300)。威權侍從政體下的臺灣反對運動:民進黨社會基礎的政治解釋。臺灣社會研究季刊,2(1),117-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
48.高恆信、李美枝(20000600)。臺灣地區人民之省籍、黨籍與政治意識型態在政治群體認同中的糾結。本土心理學研究,13,231-276。new window  延伸查詢new window
49.徐火炎(20051200)。認知動員、文化動員與臺灣2004年總統大選的選民投票行為--選舉動員類型的初步探討。臺灣民主季刊,2(4),31-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
50.王甫昌(19980700)。族群意識、民族主義與政黨支持:一九九○年代臺灣的族群政治。臺灣社會學研究,2,1-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
51.徐火炎(19960700)。臺灣選民的國家認同與黨派投票行為:一九九一至一九九三年間的實證研究結果。臺灣政治學刊,1,85-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
52.吳乃德(20021200)。認同衝突和政治信任:現階段臺灣族群政治的核心難題。臺灣社會學,4,75-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
53.Liu, I-chou(19960900)。Generational Discrepancies in Public Attitude on Taiwan's Unification Issue。Issues & Studies,32(9),103-121。new window  new window
54.陳東升、陳端容(20021200)。跨族群政治討論網絡的形成及其影響因素。臺灣社會學,4,119-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
55.王宏忠(2006)。〈我國選民配票行為之研究:以2001 年立法委員選舉為例〉。《東亞研究》,37(2),39-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
56.Chang, Andy G., and T. Y. Wang.(2005)。“Taiwanese or Chinese? Independence or Unification?”。Journal of Asian and African Studies,40 (1/2),29-49。  new window
57.Chu, Yun-han.(2004)。“Taiwan’s National Identity Politics and the Prospect of Cross-Strait Relations.”。Asian Survey,44 (4),484-512。  new window
58.Dittmer, Lowell.(2004)。“Taiwan and the Issues of National Identity.”。Asian Survey,44 (4),475-83。  new window
59.Dittmer, Lowell.(2005)。“Taiwan’s Aim-Inhibited Quest for Identity and the China Factor.”。Journal of Asian and African Studies,40 (1/2),71-90。  new window
60.Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng, and Emerson M. S. Niou.(1996)。“Salient Issues in Taiwan’s Electoral Politics.”。Electoral Studies,15 (2),219-35。  new window
61.Krosnick, Jon A., David S. Boninger, Yao C. Chuang, Matthew K. Berent, and Catherine G. Carnot.(1993)。“Attitude Strength: One Construct or Many Related Constructs?”。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,65 (6),1132-51。  new window
62.Lacy, Dean.(2001)。“A Theory of Nonseparable Preferences in Survey Responses.”。American Journal of Political Science,45(2),239-58。  new window
63.Lau, Richard R., Thad A. Brown, and David O. Sears.(1978)。“Self-Interest and Civilians’ Attitudes toward the Vietnam War.”。Public Opinion Quarterly,42 (4),464-83。  new window
64.Niou, Emerson M. S.(2004)。“Understanding Taiwan Independence and Its Policy Implications.”。Asian Survey,44 (4),555-67。  new window
65.Niou, Emerson M. S.(2005)。“A New Measure of Preferences on the Independence-Unification Issue in Taiwan.”。Journal of Asian and African Studies,40 (1/2),91-104。  new window
66.Quattrone, George A., and Amos Tversky.(1988)。“Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice.”。American Political Science Review,82 (3),719-36。  new window
67.Rigger, Shelley.(1999)。“Social Science and National Identity: A Critique.”。Pacific Affairs,72 (4),537-52。  new window
68.Rigger, Shelley.(2001)。“Maintaining the Status Quo: What It Means, and Why the Taiwanese Prefer It.”。Cambridge Review of International Affairs,14 (2),103-14。  new window
69.Sears, David O., Carl P. Hensler, and Leslie K. Speer.(1979)。“Whites’ Opposition to ‘Busing’: Self-Interest or Symbolic Politics?”。American Political Science Review,73 (2),369-84。  new window
70.Sears, David O., Richard R. Lau, Tom R. Tyler, and Harris M. Allen Jr.(1980)。“Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting.”。American Political Science Review,74 (3),670-84。  new window
71.Sears, David O., and Donald R. Kinder.(1985)。“Whites’ Opposition to Busing: On Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Group Conflict?”。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,48 (5),1141-47。  new window
72.Wang, T. Y.(2001)。“Cross-Strait Relations after the 2000 Election in Taiwan.”。Asian Survey,41 (5),716-36。  new window
73.Wang, T. Y.(2005)。“National Identity and Democratization in Taiwan: An Introduction.”。Journal of Asian and African Studies,40 (1/2),5-12。  new window
會議論文
1.Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng.(2005)。“The Uneasy Status Quo in the Cross-Strait Relations.”。Taipei。  new window
研究報告
1.黃紀、朱雲漢、胡佛、劉義周、陳義彥、陳文俊、黃秀端、徐火炎、吳玉山(2001)。臺灣選舉與民主化調查:民國九十年立法委員選舉全國大型民意調查研究 (計畫編號:NSC90-2420-H-194-001)。國立政治大學選舉研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.牛銘實、政治大學選舉研究中心(2008)。兩岸關係和國家安全民意調查。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Edelman, M. J.(1964)。The symbolic uses of politics。Chicago:University of Illinois Press。  new window
2.Corcuff, Stéphane(2002)。Memories of the Future: National Identity Issues and the Search for a New Taiwan。M. E. Sharpe。  new window
3.Cook, Karen Schweers、Levi, Margaret(1990)。The Limits of Rationality。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Doreian, Patrick、Fararo, Thomas(1998)。Problem of Solidarity: Theories and Models。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
5.Hechter, Michael(1987)。Principles of Group Solidarity。Berkeley, CA:University of California Press。  new window
6.Hardin, Russell(2002)。Trust and Trustworthiness。New York, NY:Russell Sage Foundation。  new window
7.Chai, Sun-ki(2001)。Choosing an Identity: A General Model of Preference and Belief Formation。Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan Press。  new window
8.游盈隆(1996)。民意與台灣政治變遷--1990年代台灣民意與選舉政治的解析。台北:月旦出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.胡佛(1998)。政治學的科學研究(三):政治參與與選舉行為。臺北市:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.Wachman, Alan M.(1994)。Taiwan: National Identity and Democratization。M. E. Sharpe。  new window
11.Hardin, Russell(1995)。One for all: The Logic of Group Conflict。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
12.Becker, Gary Stanley(1976)。The Economic Approach to Human Behavior。University of Chicago Press。  new window
13.江宜樺(19980000)。自由主義、民族主義與國家認同。臺北:揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.王甫昌(20030000)。當代臺灣社會的族群想像。臺北市:群學出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.沈玉慧、Parris H. Chang, and MartinL. Lasater.(1995)。《如果中共跨過台灣海峽:國際間將作何反應?》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃俊傑(2000)。〈歷史經驗與國家認同:海峽兩岸文化交流及其展望〉。《台灣意識與台灣文化》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
17.Bizer, George Y., Penny S. Visser, Matthew K. Berent, and Jon A. Krosnice.(2004)。“Importance, Knowledge, and Accessibility: Exploring the Dimensionality of Strength-Related Attitude Properties.”。Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change。Princeton, NJ。  new window
18.Hardin, Russell(1988)。Morality within the Limits of Reason。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
19.Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng.(1995)。“Chiefs, Staffers, Indians, and Others: How Was Taiwan’s Mainland China Policy Made?”。Inherited Rivalry: Conflict across the Taiwan Straits。Boulder, CO。  new window
20.Myers, Ramon H.,、Jialin Zhang.(2006)。The Struggle across the Taiwan Strait: The Divided China Problem。Stanford, CA:Hoover Institution Press。  new window
21.Niou, Emerson M. S.(2008)。“The China Factor in Taiwan’s Domestic Politics.”。Democratization in Taiwan: Challenges in Transformation。Aldershot, UK and Burlington, VT。  new window
22.Rigger, Shelley.(2007)。“Strawberry Jam: National Identity, Cross-Strait Relations and Taiwan’s Youth.”。Is There a Greater China Identity? Security and Economic Dilemma。Taipei, Taiwan。  new window
23.Sears, David O., and Carolyn L. Funk.(1991)。“The Role of Selfinterest in Social and Political Attitude.”。Advances in Experimental Social Psychology。Orlando, FL。  new window
圖書論文
1.吳乃德(1997)。國家認同和民主鞏固:衝突、共生與解決。民主鞏固或崩潰:臺灣二十一世紀的挑戰。臺北市:月旦出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.王振寰(2002)。台灣的威權體制與民主轉型。台灣社會。台北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳玉山(19990000)。臺灣的大陸政策:結構與理性。爭辯中的兩岸關係理論。臺北:五南圖書出版有限股份公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王甫昌(1998)。台灣族群政治的形成與表現:一九九四年台北市長選舉結果之分析。民主、轉型?台灣現象。臺北:桂冠出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Sears, David O.(1993)。Symbolic Politics: A Socio-Psychological Theory。Explorations in Political Psychology。Durham, NC:Duke University Press。  new window
6.Sears, David O.(2001)。The Role of Affect in Symbolic Politics。Citizens and Politics: Perspectives from Political Psychology。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.吳乃德(1993)。省籍意識、政治支持和國家認同--臺灣族群政治理論的初探。族群關係與國家認同。臺北:業強。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.張茂桂(1993)。省籍問題與民族主義。族群關係與國家認同。臺北:業強出版社:國家政策中心。  延伸查詢new window
9.Krosnick, Jon A.、Petty, Richard E.(1995)。Attitude Strength: An Overview。Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE