:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:敵意併購防禦措施之研究--以財務性防禦措施中之毒藥丸為主要範圍
書刊名:臺北大學法學論叢
作者:林國彬 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Kuo-bin
出版日期:2009
卷期:71
頁次:頁81-125
主題關鍵詞:敵意併購防禦措施財務性防禦措施毒藥丸表決權型毒藥丸財務型毒藥丸可轉換特別股毒藥丸認股權毒藥丸對外認股毒藥丸對內認股毒藥丸債性毒藥丸永久型毒藥丸長效型毒藥丸附認股權公司債毒藥丸Hostile take-overDefense measurementFinancial defense tacticsPoision pillVoting pillEconomic pillConvertible preferred stock pillStock purchase pillFlip-over pillFlip-in pillBack-end pillDead-hand pillNo hand-pillDebenture with warrant pill
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:50
  • 點閱點閱:296
期刊論文
1.Kahan, Marcel、Rock, Edward B.(2002)。How I learned to stop worrying and love the pill: Adaptive responses to takeover law。University of Chicago Law Review,69,871-915。  new window
2.林國彬(20070400)。敵意併購防禦措施之研究--黃金降落傘(Golden Parachute)。萬國法律,152,9-25。  延伸查詢new window
3.Velasco, J.(2002)。The Enduring Illegitimacy of the Poison Pill。Journal of Corporation Law,27,381-423。  new window
4.林國彬(20071200)。董事忠誠義務與司法審查標準之研究--以美國德拉瓦州公司法為主要範圍。政大法學評論,100,135-214。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃銘傑(20060200)。我國公司法制關於敵意併購與防衛措施規範之現狀與未來。月旦法學,129,134-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Carney, William J.、Silverstein, Leonard A.(2003)。The Illusory Protections of the Poison Pill。Notre Dame Law Review,79,179/ 181-182。  new window
7.Chittur, Krishnan(1985)。Wall Street's Teddy Bear: The 'Poison Pill' as a Takeover Defense。Journal of Corporation Law,11,25/ 27-29。  new window
8.Cox, Laura L.(1989)。Poison Pill: Recent Development in Delaware Law。University of Cincinnati Law Review,58,611/ 614。  new window
9.Denkewalter, J. Kurt(1989)。Poison Pill: Is the Flip-In Flipping Out?。University of Dayton Law Review,14,701-702。  new window
10.Gilson, Ronald J.、Kraakman, Reinier(1989)。Delaware's Intermediate Standard for Defensive Tactics: Is There Substance to Proportionality Review?。Business Lawyer,44,247-247。  new window
11.Harsh, Lucas O.(2000)。Dead Hand Poison Pill: Will Georgia Corporations Continue to Issue a Lethal Dose?。Georgia State University Law Review,16,665-665。  new window
12.Helman, Robert A.、Junewicz, James J.(1987)。A Fresh Look at Poison Pills。Business Lawyer,42,771-771。  new window
13.Linda, Xueqing, Jr.)(2000)。A New Look at Dead Hand Provisions in Poison Pill: Are They Per Se Invalid after Toll Brothers and Quickturn?。Saint Louis University Law Journal,44,223-223。  new window
14.Fleischer, Arthur, Jr.、Sussman, Alexander R.(2000)。Takeover Defense。Aspen Law and Business,1,5-43。  new window
15.Letsou, Peter V.(2000)。Are Dead Hand ( and No Hand ) Poison Pill Really Dead?。University of Cincinnati Law Review,68,1101-1101。  new window
16.Lipton, Martin(2002)。Pills, Polls, and Professors Redux。University of Chicago Law Review,69,1037/ 1043。  new window
17.Nathan, Charles M.、Clifford, Alicia M.(2004)。Poison Pill and Poison Pill Policies: Current Environment and Options。PLI / CORP,1460,765/ 768。  new window
18.Notes, Student、Lieberman, Neil(2008)。Justice Jackson in the Boardroom: A Proposal for Judicial Treatment of Shareholder-approved Poison Pill。Columbia Business Law Review,2008,360-361。  new window
19.Velasco, Julian(2003)。Just Do It: An Antidote to the Poison Pill。Emory Law Journal,52,849-850。  new window
20.Wingerson, Mark R.、Dorn, Christopher H.(1992)。Institutional Investors in the U.S. and the Repeal of Poison Pill: A Practitioner's Perspective。Columbia Business Law Review,1992,223-223。  new window
學位論文
1.劉彥皇(2007)。公司敵意併購防禦措施之研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.賴英照(2006)。股市遊戲規則--最新證券交易法解析。台北:賴英照。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fletcher, William Meade(2008)。Fletcher cyclopedia of the law of corporations。Thomson Reuters/West。  new window
3.Bryan, Joy Marlene(2005)。Corporate Anti-takeover Defenses: The Poison Pill Device。Corporate Anti-takeover Defenses: The Poison Pill Device。  new window
4.Rachelson, Aaron(2008)。Corporate Acquisitions, Mergers, and Divestitures。Corporate Acquisitions, Mergers, and Divestitures。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE