:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:英國政府眼中的臺灣地位:法律與政策
書刊名:臺灣國際法季刊
作者:王冠雄李明峻
作者(外文):Wang, Kuan-hsiungLi, Ming-juinn
出版日期:2009
卷期:6:2
頁次:頁29-52
主題關鍵詞:臺灣英國中共國際法承認TaiwanUKPRCInternational lawRecognition
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:80
英國外交政策向以彈性著稱,其為西方國家中第一個宣布承認中華人民共和國政府,然而由於聯合國中中國代表權席位的問題,以及英國仍然維持與台灣的關係(即使是非官方的),使得英國與中共之間的正式外交關係一直到1972年方才確定,而英國方於同年關閉在台灣淡水的領事館。本文之目的乃在觀察英國的彈性外交作爲,特別是其在處理台海兩岸之間關係上所展現的現實性。首先,本文將再檢視以1953年Civil Air Transport Inc. v. Central Air Transport Corporation案爲首的諸項判例,藉此觀察英國在處理國際法議題中關於政府承認回溯效力問題之態度。其次,英國行政部門在處理對台關係時,其所建立的若干不同性質的機構也是本文所欲觀察的對象,這些機構在實質上維繫英國與台灣之間的關係。本文作者認爲由於英國執著於傳統國際法的規範,使得英國與台灣之間仍難建立正式的外交關係。然而,台灣是一個民主、法治、尊重人權、文明進步的國家,若能持續維持此一特色,則在持續與英國的交往上,將可處於有利之局面。
United Kingdom was the first western country of recognizing the government of the People's Republic of China when the latter established in October 1949. However, due to the issue of Chinese seat in the United Nations and the relations between the UK and the government of the Republic of China (Taiwan), both the UK and the PRC did not establish their official diplomatic relations until 1972 when the UK removed its consulate in Tamsui, Taiwan. This paper is going to observe the UK's diplomatic flexibility especially in dealing with the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. Firstly, the case of Civil Air Transport Inc. v. Central Air Transport Corporation (1953) was re-examined so that the consideration of retroactivity of the principle of continuity in state succession could be perceived. Secondly, some of the developments made by the administrative section of the UK were analyzed, such as different organs and mechanism were established so that the substantial relations, although still unofficial, could be maintained. The author concludes that it is difficult to established official relations between Taiwan and the UK owing to the latter's strict perspectives on related principles of the international law. Nonetheless, it is still practicable to say that both sides could improve their relations if Taiwan could demonstrate its improvement on democracy, liberty, and human rights protection.
期刊論文
1.Constantinescu, Dumitru、Brooks, David(200904)。U.S., Canadian and EU Approaches to China’s Economic Rise: Continuity of Traditional Transatlantic Ties or Competing Special Relationships?。Policy Brief,9。  new window
2.陳榮宗(19910700)。國際民事訴訟之法律問題。法學叢刊,36(3)=143,25-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.涂成吉(2007)。克萊恩與臺灣:反共理想與理性之衝突和妥協(博士論文)。淡江大學,臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Brownlie, I.(2003)。Principle of Public International Law。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Mann, F. A.(1986)。Foreign Affairs in English Court。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
3.黃剛(200410)。世界各國與台海兩岸政府之使領或實質關係演變時程及年表( 1949-2003)。黃剛。  延伸查詢new window
4.胡辛(1995)。陳香梅傳。台北:國際村。  延伸查詢new window
5.Endicott, Stephen L.(1975)。Diplomacy and Enterprise: British China Policy, 1933-1937。Vancouver。  new window
6.Chen, Ti-Chiang(1951)。The International Law of Recognition。London:Stevens and Sons Ltd.。  new window
7.Harris, D. J.(1991)。Cases and Materials on International Law。London:Sweet & Maxwell。  new window
8.劉鐵錚、陳榮傳(1996)。國際私法論。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.丘宏達(2006)。現代國際法。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.Kaufman, Victor S.(2001)。Confronting Communism: U.S. and British Policies toward China。University of Missouri。  new window
其他
1.建交史上的創舉:半外交關係,http://zxss.ynet.com/article.jsp?oid=52145341。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Brownlie, Ian(1982)。’’Recognition in Theory and Practice。British Yearbook of International Law。  new window
2.Lalive, J. F.(1979)。Swiss Law and Practice in Relation to Measures of Execution Against the Property of a Foreign States。Netherlands Yearbook of International Law。  new window
3.張素林。新中國的半外交關係。外交檔案。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE