:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學習成效預測系統建立與測試個案研究
書刊名:國立虎尾科技大學學報
作者:謝宜宸蘇琮仁黃韋欽陳威宏陳浩棠吳宗謀 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsieh, Yi-chernSu, Cong-renHuang, Wei-qinChen, Wei-hongChen, Hao-tangWu, Zong-mou
出版日期:2010
卷期:29:2
頁次:頁37-48
主題關鍵詞:學習方式性格價值觀學習成效混合系統Learning methodsPersonalityValueLearning achievementHybrid system
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:25
現今大學林立,各種不同程度之學生均有機會攻讀學士學位,然而在教育過程中,對於影響學生學習成效的原因之注重程度又較以往式微的大環境下,如何能以學生目前學習方式、學習者性格、學習前測試結果、價値觀等因素去預測學生未來可能成績等第,進而對於教與學雙方都會產生若干預警的效能,如此對於提升教學成效也許會有所助益。本文針對技職學生,先以上述各因素進行網路問卷調查及基礎能力測試,再以混合系統對問卷及測試結果做推論。研究結果發現本學習成效預測系統對於所進行的部份專業科目成績預測效果佳,然而對於非專業科目之學習成效預測則稍有偏差。至於預測成績較佳或較差的同學均較爲正確,這對事前提出預警會有相當的助益。由於本研究所使用之各種不同程式語言所寫出之各部份的各項功能均爲自行研發設計者,所以對於未來研究之配合改進極爲方便。它的優點在於資訊的取得方便受測者,整個資訊處理過程全部電腦化,故不會有人爲因素之偏差,推論方式或統計計算均可以自行修正或選擇,不會有因須配合其他工業軟體之使用而造成困擾,對於結論的處理亦易於電腦化。另外,系統的個人化或個別科目局部化結果使得本系統發展具有相當的彈性。由於本次研究爲初創,對於還需加入預測系統之影響因素或其他推論方式將會於往後的研究中繼續努力發展。
Almost all students have opportunity to study in universities nowadays. However, there are less and less paying attentions on what factors affecting university students' learning achievement. It is beneficial for both teaching and learning if teachers can predict the students' possible future achievement by their learning manner, personality, value, and informal test results. In this article, we first use questionnaires to collect these factors through internet, and then we established a hybrid system to make an inference about students' future achievement by the factors. The research indicates that the predict results for curriculum achievement in professional subjects are much better than unprofessional ones. Since each specific function in the system is programmed with different computer language and designed by ourselves, it is flexible for future further researches. The advantages of the system are the convenience for collecting data, automatically information processes without any possible ignorance from people, statistic calculations and inference methods being chosen liberally, free from puzzles for using engineering software in some specific situations, and the output of the system being easy handled by computer. Besides, individualize of the system and localized of one specific subject make the system become rather flexible. There are more reasoning factors and other inference engines need to be added in this system for future study after this debut research.
期刊論文
1.謝寥宸、徐三權(200606)。機械類科系學生對價值觀、刺激忍受力、調適方式與專業科目成績表現等因素之可能關連性個案研究。國立虎尾科技大學學報,25(2),13-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.謝宜宸、吳穎麒、鄭宇順(200403)。二年制技術學院機械類科系學生的價值觀與學習態度之關連性個案研究。國立虎尾科技大學學報,1,155-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.De Raad, B.、Schouwenburg, H. C.(1996)。Personality in learning and education: a review。European Journal of Personality,10,303-336。  new window
4.Elshout, J. J.、Veenman, M. V. J.(1992)。Relation between intellectual ability and working method as predictors of learning。Journal of Educational Research,85,134-143。  new window
5.Rozendaal, J. S.、Minnaert, A.、Boekarets, M.(2005)。The influence of teacher perceived administration of self-regulated learning on students' motivation and information-processing。Learning and Instruction,15,141-160。  new window
6.Rozendaal, J. S.、Minnaert, J.、Boekarets, M.(2001)。Motivation and self-regulated learning: information-processing type and gender differences。Learning and Individual Differences,13(4),273-289。  new window
7.Wang, J.、Lin, E.(2009)。A meta-analysis of comparative studies on Chinese and US students mathematics performance: Implications for mathematics education reform and research。Educational Research Review,4,177-195。  new window
8.Baumert, Jürgen、Lüdtke, Oliver、Trautwein, Ulrich、Brunner, Martin(2009)。Large-scale student assessment studies measure the results of processes of knowledge acquisition: Evidence in support of the distinction between intelligence and student achievement。Educational Research Review,4,165-176。  new window
9.Minnaert, A.(1999)。Motivational and emotional components affecting male's and female's self-regulated learning。European Journal of Psychology of Education,14(4),525-540。  new window
10.Solomon, A.、Guthrie, J.(1999)。Predicting understanding with cognitive and motivational variables。Journal of Educational Research,92(4),243-254。  new window
11.謝宜宸、姚景超(200906)。教師教學與自我學習因素對學習成效影響之研究--以某些技職班級為例。國立虎尾科技大學學報,28(2),43-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.謝宜宸、莊惟宇、黃建勝(200609)。工程數學課程教學設計與學習情形訪查個案研究。國立虎尾科技大學學報,25(3),9-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.謝宜宸、莊仁泰(20100300)。大學生在自我效能、知識論信念、人際互動、網路習性及專業基礎項目之關係個案研究。國立虎尾科技大學學報,29(1),43-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Busato, V. V.、Prins, F. J.、Elshout, J. J.、Hamaker, C.(1999)。The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education。Personality and Individual Differences,26(1),129-140。  new window
15.Trigwell, K.、Prosser, M.(1991)。Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes。Higher Education,22,251-266。  new window
16.Butler, Deborah L.、Winne, Philip H.(1995)。Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis。Review of Educational Research,65(3),245-281。  new window
17.Cleary, T. J.、Chen, P. P.(2009)。Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context。Journal of School Psychology,47(5),291-314。  new window
18.Eysenck, H. J.(1992)。Four Ways Five Factors Are not Basic。Personality and Individual Differences,13(6),667-673。  new window
19.Limón, M.(2001)。On the Cognitive Conflict as an Instructional Strategy for Conceptual Change: A Critical Appraisal。Learning and Instruction,11,357-380。  new window
20.Wolters, C. A.(1999)。The Relation between High School Students' Motivational Regulation and Their Use of Learning Strategies, Effort, and Classroom。Learning & Individual Differences,11,281-300。  new window
21.Wigfield, A.、Eccles, J. S.(2000)。Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation。Contemporary Educational Psychology,25(1),68-81。  new window
22.Gow, Lyn、Kember, David(1990)。Does higher education promote independent learning?。Higher Education,19,307-322。  new window
23.Busato, V. V.、Prins, F. J.、Elshout, J. J.、Hamaker, C.(2000)。Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education。Personality and Individual Differences,29(6),1057-1068。  new window
24.Elliot, A. J.、Moller, A. C.(2003)。Performance-approach goals : good or bad forms of regulation?。International Journal of Educational Research,39,339-356。  new window
圖書
1.Negnevitsky, Michael(2004)。Artificial Intelligence: A guide to intelligent systems。Addison Wesley。  new window
2.陳會安(2000)。AS網頁製作徹底研究。旗標。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top