:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:企業勞資關係「內涵」之建構與實證研究
書刊名:台灣勞動評論
作者:吳全成 引用關係陳俊益 引用關係黃國城
作者(外文):Wu, Chuan-chengChen, Jun-yiHuang, Guo-cheng
出版日期:2010
卷期:2:2
頁次:頁373-396
主題關鍵詞:勞資關係內涵建構層級分析法德菲法評估準則Industrial relationsContent constructionAnalytic hierarchy processAHPDelphi methodAssessment criteria
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:38
企業勞資關係內涵的建構,可以測定其勞資關係的和諧程度。首先,本研究經過正式施測於研究對象之員工,計回收有效問卷173 份,透過重要性分析、內部一致性分析及項目分析等統計分析後,發展出勞資關係「內涵」。第二,依據上述方法編製之企業勞資關係模型及評估準則,本研究結合層級分析法與德菲法建立一個勞資關係評估模式,並以建立評估準則及架構AHP 權重分配,得到準則權重排序後,確立了勞資關係「內涵」的評估模型及其構面和評估因素。本研究之重要結論如下:(1)員工對影響我國企業勞資關係重要因素之認知,包括勞資協商等五項。(2)員工對影響該企業勞資關係重要因素之認知,包括勞資協商等五項。(3)企業勞資關係評估準則,包括勞資協商等四大構面及請假率等十八項等因素。本研究之貢獻包括:(1)確立企業勞資關係構面;(2)企業勞資關係影響因素之權重;(3)員工對企業勞資關係之解讀。研究結果提供政府及實務界在處理勞資關係時之參考。
This research aims to analyze the issues and find out the key contents of industrial relations (IR) within the enterprises in Taiwan. The research combines two methods to create a model for IR by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Delphi Method. Firstly, the research developed a questionnaire of IR was distributed to employees of sample enterprises, and 173 questionnaires were returned. Secondly, assessment techniques were used to establish criteria, analyzing the distribution of the AHP framework and obtaining results by grading factors. The conclusions are: There are five important factors which impact upon IR according to the employees of the sample enterprises. The contents of IR can be subdivided into four dimensions and eighteen different items based on the principles for evaluating criteria. Contributions of this research include: (1) establishing the dimensions of industrial relations; (2) grading the importance of factors within industrial relations; (3) finding out the differences and interpreting of industrial relations between laborers and management. Recommendations are made for the government, as well as for enterprises in dealing with the issues of IR whenever a dispute occurs.
期刊論文
1.李耀泰(20081200)。新加坡勞、資、政三邊關係的檢視:一個歷史制度主義的觀點。人文暨社會科學期刊,4(2),93-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳文彬(2009)。從合作走向衝突:1970~1974 年間英國工業關係探析,經濟學研究。雲南大學學報,8(5),46-95。  延伸查詢new window
3.Geare A.、Edgar, F.、McAndrew I.(2006)。Labor Relations Strategies, Tactics, And Post-Election Management Practices。The International Journal of Human Resource Management,17(7),1190。  new window
4.Singh, P.、Parker, J. A.、Nadim, A.(2007)。Employment relationships: ideology and HRM practice。International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management,7(3/4),335。  new window
5.Steen E Navrbjerg, S. E.、Minbaeva, D. B.(2009)。Employee relations in small businesses: examining underdeveloped issues。The International Journal of Human Resource Management,20(8),17-20。  new window
圖書
1.Greg J. B.、Russell, D. L.、Joseph, S. L.、成之約(2000)。比較就業關係序論:比較勞資關係。台北:華泰書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳復新(2003)。人力資源管理--理論分析與實務應用。台北:華泰書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.張天開(1980)。各國勞資關係制度。台北:中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳繼盛(1976)。勞資關係。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.Roberts, H. S.(1970)。Roberts’ Dictionary of Industrial Relation。Manoa:University of Hawaii Industrial Relations Center。  new window
6.Sauer, Robert L.、Voelker, Keith E.(1993)。Labor Relations: Structure and Process。New York:MacMillan Publishing Company。  new window
7.黃英忠(1998)。人力資源管理。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE