:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:韓戰期間志願遣俘原則之議定(1950~1953)
書刊名:國史館館刊
作者:周琇環
作者(外文):Chou, Hsiuhuan
出版日期:2010
卷期:24
頁次:頁45-47+49-88
主題關鍵詞:志願戰俘原則杜魯門葉公超反共戰俘韓戰停戰協定The principle of voluntary repatriation of POWsHarry S. TrumanGeorge K. C. YehAnti-communist POWsThe Korean Armistice Agreement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:51
志願遣俘原則的議定,源自於1951年6月戰俘營中發生反共、親共戰俘的激烈鬥爭。隨後美國陸軍心戰處長麥克盧爾提出准許前國民政府的中國戰俘前往臺灣的建議,引發華盛頓高層反覆的討論。1952年2月底,在美國總統杜魯門與各部會討論後,決定以志願遣俘原則,也就是尊重戰俘的自由意志,不強迫他們回到原隸屬國家,作為美國最終政策,並指示國務院、國防部,命令聯軍統帥李奇威在停戰談判中執行此原則。 聯軍為了確立志願遣俘原則,曾在漫長的談判過程中,堅定立場,不稍改變。中華民國政府因為非韓戰參戰國之一,對停戰談判等事殊少發言機會,1952年2月外長葉公超代表政府宣示歡迎反共戰俘來臺的意旨。4月,聯軍在和談會議上確定採納志願遣俘原則。10月,因板門店談判無限期休會,主要戰場轉至聯合國。12月,聯合國通過第610(7)號決議案,確立聯軍往後的韓戰政策及決定戰俘的命運,而這階段中,共方的一貫態度就是反對到底。 直至1953年史達林去世,蘇聯改採和平策略,戰俘談判的情勢丕變,敵對雙方首先完成傷病戰俘的交換,6月又簽訂換俘協定,共方正式認可志願遣俘原則,7月底停戰協定簽字,至此民主或共產集團國家,在彼此的節制、不願擴大戰事下達成協定,使國際間共同建立起志願遣俘的新政治庇護制度。
The formulation of the principle (s) of voluntary repatriation of POWs during the Korean War arose from the fierce conflict of allegiance between anti- and procommunist POWs in June 1951. The U.S. Army Chief of Psychological Warfare, Brigadier General Robert A. McClure proposed that the Chinese POWs be allowed to go to Taiwan, which proposal caused a series of discussion among the top officials in Washington D.C. After his consultation with various departments within the U.S. government in the end of February 1952, President Harry S. Truman decided that the final U.S. principle was not to force the POWs to go back to their own country but to respect their free will and both the Department of State and the Department of Defense were instructed to delegate General Ridgway to execute this principle during the armistice talk. To ensure this principle of voluntary repatriation, the UNC had stood firmly by its position and never wavered from the beginning to the end. Not being one of the belligerents in the Korean War, Foreign Minister of the R.O.C., Mr. Kungchao Yeh, declared in February of 1952 that the government would welcome those anticommunist POWs to come to Taiwan. In the Peace Talk Conference of April 1952, the UNC affirmed the adoption of the principle of voluntary repatriation. In October of that year, the talk was being postponed indefinitely and the main war zone moved to the UN. In December of 1952, the UN passed the resolution 610 (VII) to make sure the strategy and policy of the Korean War and the fate of the POWs. To all this, the Chinese communists had adopted an attitude of opposition from the very beginning to the end. Not until its Leader Stalin passed away in March 1953, did Soviet Union adopt a new peace policy, resulting in an improvement of the situation of POWs negotiations ever since. This began with liaison officers of both sides at Panmunjom exchanging the sick and wounded POWs, then followed by the signing of the POW Pact in June of that year. Finally, the Chinese Communists officially recognized the principle of voluntary repatriation and the Korean Armistice Agreement was signed in July of 1953, thanks to the restraint and reluctance to broaden the scope of the war by all belligerent parties, either democrat or communist. The principle of voluntary repatriation of the POWs witnessed a new political asylum system being established among the international societies.
期刊論文
1.梁鎮三(20030600)。朝鮮戰爭期間中朝高層的矛盾、分歧及其解決--冷戰中社會主義陣營內國家關係研究案例之一。中央研究院近代史研究所集刊,40,55-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.南湘(2000)。抗美援朝出兵決策。百年潮,2000(9)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.沈幸儀(2008)。一萬四千個證人:韓戰時期「反共義士」之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔣洪勇(2005)。戰俘問題與朝鮮停戰(碩士論文),武漢。  延伸查詢new window
3.趙娟(2008)。論朝鮮停戰談判中的戰俘問題(碩士論文),太原。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Truman, Harry S.(1956)。Memoirs By Harry S. Truman, Vol. 2: Years of trial and hope, 1946-1952。Doubleday Company Inc。  new window
2.沈志華(2003)。毛澤東、斯大林與朝鮮戰爭。廣州:廣東人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.柴成文、趙勇田(1989)。板門店談判。北京:解放軍出版社局社。  延伸查詢new window
4.周琇環(2001)。戰後外交部工作報告(民國39至民國42年)。臺北:國史館。  延伸查詢new window
5.沈志華(2003)。朝鮮戰爭:俄國檔案館的解密文件。臺北:中央研究院近代史研究所。  延伸查詢new window
6.Simmons, Robert R.(1975)。The Strained Alliance: Peking, Pyongyang, Moscow and the Politics of the Korean Civil War。Free Press。  new window
7.Acheson, Dean(1969)。Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department。W.W. Norton & Company。  new window
8.Foot, Rosemary(1990)。A Substitute for Victory: The Politics of Peacemaking at the Korean Armistice Talks。A Substitute for Victory: The Politics of Peacemaking at the Korean Armistice Talks。Ithaca, NY。  new window
9.Song, Hyo-soon(1980)。The Fight for Freedom: The Untold Story of the Korean War Prisoners。Seoul:Korean Library Association。  new window
10.Goulden, Joseph C.(1982)。The Untold Story of the Korean War。The Untold Story of the Korean War。N.Y.。  new window
11.Zhu, Pingchao(2001)。Americans and Chinese at the Korean War Cease-Fire Negotiations, 1950-1953。Americans and Chinese at the Korean War Cease-Fire Negotiations, 1950-1953。Lewiston, N.Y.。  new window
12.Lee, Steven Hugh(2001)。The Korean War。The Korean War。N.Y.。  new window
13.Stueck, William(1995)。The Korean War: An International History。The Korean War: An International History。Prinseton, New Jersey。  new window
14.(1960)。Public Paper of the Presidents: Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1953。Public Paper of the Presidents: Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1953。Washington, D. C.。  new window
15.(1954)。反共義士(1)。反共義士(1)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.中央通訊社總社編輯部(1954)。韓境停戰談判始末。韓境停戰談判始末。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.(1988)。中華民國史事紀要(民國43年1-6月份)。中華民國史事紀要(民國43年1-6月份)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.程來儀(2000)。正義與邪惡的較量-朝鮮戰爭戰俘之謎。正義與邪惡的較量-朝鮮戰爭戰俘之謎。北京。  延伸查詢new window
19.賀明(1998)。忠誠-志願軍戰俘歸來人員的坎坷經歷。忠誠-志願軍戰俘歸來人員的坎坷經歷。北京。  延伸查詢new window
20.Kaufman, Burton I.(1999)。The Korean Conflict。The Korean Conflict。Conn.。  new window
其他
1.反共義士,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.韓戰後反共義士歸國,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.處裡反共義士歸國之經過,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.韓境共俘問題,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.反共(義士)戰俘案,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.接運留韓中國反共義士歸國聯絡小組報告,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.在韓中共俘虜,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.韓戰和談,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.韓國李承晚大統領訪臺暨擬訂太平洋同盟,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.留韓反共義士處理案,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.交涉韓戰匪俘志願反共者回國,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.(1951)。Korea and China: Vol. VII, part 1。  new window
13.(1952)。Korea: Vol. XV, part 1。  new window
14.(1951)。中央日報。  延伸查詢new window
15.(1954)。全民日報、民族報、經濟時報聯合版。  延伸查詢new window
16.(1954)。華僑日報。  延伸查詢new window
17.Chang, David(2008)。'huijia' (To return home): The origins of the 'forcible screening' for 'voluntary repatriation' of Chinese POWs during the Korean War,臺北。  new window
18.Article 7, Article 118, Geneva Convention III: relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War。  new window
圖書論文
1.邱楠(1955)。四年磨練豈為洗腦。反共義士奮鬥史。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳紀瀅(1955)。巨濟島漢賊不兩立。反共義士奮鬥史。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bernstein, Barton J.(1983)。The Struggle over the Korean Armistice: Prisoners of Repatriation?。Child of Conflict: The Korean-American relationship, 1943-1953。Seattle。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top