:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:動態的制度史--《文獻通考》之史學方法
書刊名:臺大歷史學報
作者:李宗翰
作者(外文):Lee, Tsong-han
出版日期:2010
卷期:46
頁次:頁1-34
主題關鍵詞:馬端臨文獻通考史學故事Ma DuanlinWenxian tongkaoHistoriographyGushi
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:47
本文透過分析《文獻通考》之組織架構,討論馬端臨 (1254~ca.1330) 之史學方法。《文獻通考》所展現的史學方法,乃將典章制度置入歷史脈絡中,對之進行動態的觀察與分析,據以探究其利弊得失。而這種史學方法的具體操作,則是透過馬端臨精心設計的組織架構達成。《文獻通考》的組織架構可區分為「文」、「獻」兩大類,兩者由四個層次建構而成:第一層次屬於「文」,收錄關於典章制度的史料(包括典章制度之規範,及其在歷史上施行之相關史料);第二、三、四層次均屬「獻」,第二層次收錄當時人之相關議論,第三層次收錄後世諸儒之議論,而第四層次則為馬端臨自己之按語。以上四層次彼此形成有機的聯繫,將史料與議論相互交織成一部動態的制度史。《文獻通考》所建構出來的典章制度史,呈現出高度一致的敘事方式,且其問題意識非常明確,均為針對政府組織運作之根本原則。此種史學方法,乃是要對政府運作機制進行理性的檢討,從而為當代與後世之政府運作機制提出切實可行的建議。而馬端臨博綜精密的史學方法,乃是孕育於宋代「故事」史學繁興的歷史環境中。
This article discusses Ma Duanlin’s (馬端臨, 1254-ca.1330) historical method by analyzing Wenxian tongkao’s (《文獻通考》) organizational structure. Wenxian tongkao’s historical method is to situate institutions in their historical context, observe and analyze their processes dynamically, and then investigate their advantages and disadvantages. This method is applied through a carefully-designed structure by Ma Duanlin. The structure of Wenxian tongkao can be divided into two categories: “wen” (文, sources) and “xian” (獻, worthies’ discussions), which are constructed by four levels. The first level belongs to the wen category, which is a collection of sources of institutions (including sources of both institutional regulations and their actual operations in history). The second to the fourth levels belong to the xian category. The second level records contemporaries’ discussions, and the third level later Confucian scholars’ discussions. The fourth level records Ma Duanlin’s own comments. The four levels are interconnected to construct a dynamic institutional history. As a result, the institutional history presented by Wenxian tongkao presents a highly coherent narrative with clearly defined questions. All of the questions are relevant to the fundamental principles of the governmental process. The purpose of this kind of historical approach is to examine governmental process rationally and provide practical suggestions for the contemporary and future governments. Ma Duanlin’s elaborate historical method took shape in the background of the prosperity of the gushi (故事) genre during the Song Dynasty.
期刊論文
1.鄧小南(2003)。走向「活」的制度史--以宋代官僚政治制度史研究為例的點滴思考。浙江學刊,3,99-103。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Sung, Chia-fu(2010)。Between Tortoise and Mirror: Historians and Historiography in Eleventh-Century China。  new window
圖書
1.金毓黼(2000)。中國史學史。石家莊:河北教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Novick, P.(1988)。That Noble Dream: The 'Objectivity Question' and the American Historical Profession。That Noble Dream: The 'Objectivity Question' and the American Historical Profession。Cambridge/ New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.蒙文通(2006)。中國史學史。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Iggers, G. G.(1997)。Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge。Hanover, NH:University Press of New England:Wesleyan UP。  new window
5.房玄齡(1973)。隋書。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.瞿林東(1999)。中國史學史綱。北京出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.王重民(1984)。中國目錄學史論叢。北京市:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.趙爾巽(1976)。清史稿。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.歐陽修、宋祁(1975)。新唐書。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.馬端臨(1987)。文獻通考。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉昫(1975)。舊唐書。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.馬端臨(1986)。文獻通考。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.杜佑、王文錦、王永興、劉俊文、徐庭雲、謝方(1988)。通典。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.張廷玉(1974)。明史。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.章學誠、葉瑛(1985)。文史通義校注。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.〔 元〕 馬端臨(2003)。文獻通考。中華再造善本。北京。  延伸查詢new window
17.〔 元〕 馬端臨。文獻通考 (臺灣國家圖書館藏元泰定元年(1324 )西湖書院刊本)。  延伸查詢new window
18.(元)馬端臨(1368)。文獻通考 (臺灣國家圖書館藏1368 年鄿陽馮天馭校勘本)。  延伸查詢new window
19.(元〕 馬端臨。文獻通考 (臺灣國家圖書館藏明正德十四年(1519 )建陽劉氏慎獨齋刊本)。  延伸查詢new window
20.〔 清〕 錢大昕(1996)。元史藝文志。嘉定錢大昕全集。南京。  延伸查詢new window
21.王瑞明主編(1994)。文獻通考研究。鄭州。  延伸查詢new window
22.王瑞明(2001)。馬端臨評傳。南京。  延伸查詢new window
23.王德毅(2002)。馬端臨與文獻通考。《 宋史研究集》。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
24.尹達(1988)。中國史學發展史。臺北:天山出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.吳懷祺(2002)。馬端臨的學術淵源和史學思想。中國史學思想通史• 宋遼金卷。合肥。  延伸查詢new window
26.張元(2005)。馬端臨對胡寅史論的看法。台灣學者中國史研究論叢:思想與學術。北京。  延伸查詢new window
27.張元(2008)。馬端臨史論的結構分析。鄧廣銘教授百年誕辰紀念論文集。北京。  延伸查詢new window
28.陳寅恪(2000)。陳垣明季滇黔佛教考序。金明館叢稿二編。北京。  延伸查詢new window
29.鄧瑞(2003)。馬端臨與文獻通考。太原。  延伸查詢new window
30.錢穆(1973)。馬端臨文獻通考。中國史學名著。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
31.內藤虎次郎(1949)。支那史學史。束京。  延伸查詢new window
32.Chan Hok-lam(1982)。Comprehensiveness’(T’ung) and ‘Change’(Pien) in Ma Tuan-lin’s Historical Thought。Yüan Thought: Chinese Thought and Religion under the Mongols。New York。  new window
33.Fulbrook, Mary(2002)。Historical Theories。London and New York。  new window
34.Haskell, Thomas(1998)。Objectivity Is Not Neutrality: Explanatory Schemes In History。Baltimore and London。  new window
35.Jenkins Keith(1995)。‘“What is History? “: From Carr and Elton to Rorty and White。London & New York。  new window
36.Wang Edward Q. and Ng On-cho(2005)。Mirroring the Past: the Writing and Use of History in Imperial China。Honolulu。  new window
37.陳樂素(200)。宋史藝文志考證。廣州。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.脫脫(1977)。李處耘附李繼和傳。宋史。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top