臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：圖書資訊學知識來源與知識擴散指標之研究
書刊名：圖書館學與資訊科學
作者：黃慕萱 引用關係／何蕙菩
作者(外文)：Huang, Mu-hsuan／Ho, Hui-pu
出版日期：2009
卷期：35:2
頁次：頁14-33
主題關鍵詞：圖書資訊學；知識來源；知識擴散；跨學科研究；指標；Library and information science；Knowledge originality；Knowledge generality；Interdisciplinary research；Indicators
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:31
  • 點閱點閱:40
本文以1997年至2006年圖書資訊學之引用文獻與被引用文獻作為分析對象，除研究圖書資訊學知識來源與知識擴散程度外，並探討四種知識來源與知識擴散指標之差異性與適用性，包括 COC、WCOC、Brillouin’s Index、Originality/ Generality。本文發現，圖書資訊學知識來源程度較知識擴散程度高。圖書資訊學知識來源的學科自我引用率逐漸降低，而知識擴散仍以學科境內擴散為主，但與過去研究結果相比，對其他學科影響逐漸提高。在各指標比較上， COC與WCOC著重跨學科引用程度，兩指標相關性極高，相互取代性大； Brillouin’s Index易受樣本特性影響，適用於衡量分類較細之專利號或學科； Originality/ Generality則適用於衡量分類較粗之學科。
This study uses bibliometric methods to measure knowledge originality and knowledge generality of Library and Information Science (LIS) by using citing and cited documents from 1997 to 2006. This study further discusses the difference and applicability of four knowledge originality and knowledge generality indicators, including COC, WCOC, Brillouin’s Index, and Originality/Generality. We find that the extent of knowledge originality is more than that of knowledge generality in LIS. The subject self-citation (SSC) of LIS in knowledge originality has been trending down, whereas that in knowledge generality is still high, signifying main knowledge transfers within LIS itself. However, comparing this finding with the past, we find LIS has increasingly more impact on the other disciplines. Through analysis from these indicators, we also find that with COC and WCOC, we can quickly identify the rate of subject self-citation and interdisciplinary citations, but the two indicators show high relevance and may be inter-replaceable. While both emphasizing on the distribution of disciplines, Brillouin’s Index tends to be more sensitive to the samples, thus useful in measuring categories with specific classification schemes such as patent classifications or smaller discipline fields, whereas Generality/ Originality is useful for more generalized subjects.
期刊論文
1.Lo, C. M.,、Morand, S., and Galzin, R.、Galzin, R.(1998)。Parasite diversity host age and size relationship in three coral-reef fishes from French Polynesia。International Journal for Parasitology，28(11)，1695-1798。  new window
2.Steele, T. W.,、Stier, J. C.(2000)。The impact interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences: A forestry case study。Journal of the American Society for Information Science，51(5)，476-484。  new window
3.Rinia, E. J.、van Leeuwen, T. N.、Bruins, E. E. W.、Van Vuren, H. G.、Van Raan, A. F. J.(2002)。Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science。Scientometrics，54(3)，347-362。  new window
4.Sorenson, O.、Fleming, L.(2004)。Science and the diffusion of knowledge。Research Policy，33(10)，1615-1634。  new window
5.Pritchard, Alan(1969)。Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?。Journal of Documentation，25(4)，348-349。  new window
6.Buttlar, Lois(1999)。Information sources in library and information science doctoral research。Library & Information Science Research，21(2)，227-245。  new window
7.Chen, C. M.、Hicks, D.(2004)。Tracing knowledge diffusion。Scientometrics，59(2)，199-211。  new window
8.Cronin, B.、Pearson, S.(1990)。The exports of ideas from information science。Journal of Information Science，16(6)，381-391。  new window
9.Fung, M. K.、Chow, W. W.(2002)。Measuring The Intensity of Knowledge Flow With Patent Statistics。Economics Letters，74(3)，353-358。  new window
10.Hurd, J. M.(1992)。Interdisciplinary research in the sciences: Implications for library organization。College & Research Libraries，53(4)，283-297。  new window
11.Kortelainen, T. A. M.(2001)。Studying the international diffusion of a national scientific journal。Scientometrics，51(1)，133-146。  new window
12.Lewison, G.、Rippon, I.、Wooding, S.(2005)。Tracking knowledge diffusion through citations。Research Evaluation，14(1)，5-14。  new window
13.Meyer, Terry、Spencer, John(1996)。A citation analysis study of Library Science: Who cites librarians?。College & Research Libraries，57(1)，23-33。  new window
14.Pierce, S. J.(1999)。Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer。Journal of the American Society for Information Science，50(3)，271-279。  new window
15.Porter, Alan L.、Chubin, Daryl E.(1985)。An indicator of cross-disciplinary research。Scientometrics，8(3/4)，161-176。  new window
16.Rinia, E. J.、Van Leeuwen, T. N.、Bruins, E. E. W.、Van Vuren, H. G.、Van Raan, A. F. J.(2001)。Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange。Scientometrics，51(1)，293-309。  new window
17.Smith, Linda C.(1981)。Citation Analysis。Library Trends，30(1)，83-106。  new window
18.Tang, R.(2004)。Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science。Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology，41(1)，54-63。  new window
19.Trajtenberg, Manuel、Henderson, Rebecca、Jaffe, Adam B.(1997)。University versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Invention。Economics of Innovation and New Technology，5(1)，19-50。  new window
20.Urata, H.(1990)。Information flows among academic disciplines in Japan。Scientometrics，18(3/4)，309-319。  new window
21.陳光華、梁瓊方(20040900)。臺灣圖書資訊學之跨學科交流。圖書資訊學刊，2(2)，31-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.鄭麗敏(19941200)。近20年臺灣地區圖書館學與資訊科學期刊論文引用參考文獻特性分析。教育資料與圖書館學，32(2)，210-238。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Alcácer, J.、Gittelman, M.(2006)。Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations。Review of Economics and Statistics，88(4)，774-779。  new window
學位論文
1.Al-Sabbagh, I. A.(1987)。The evolution of the interdisciplinarity of information science: A bibliometric study(博士論文)。Florida State University。  new window
2.陳旭耀(1997)。臺灣地區圖書資訊學碩士論文及其引用文獻之研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Robinson, W. C.(1973)。Subject dispersion in political science: an analysis of reference appearing in the journal literature, 1910-1960(博士論文)。University of Illinois，Illinois。  new window
4.黃裕惠(2004)。分子生物與遺傳學之文獻計量分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學，台北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.譚修雯(1997)。從引文分析探討學科知識結構的可能性：以社會科學博碩士論文為例(碩士論文)。淡江大學，台北縣。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Klein, Julie Thompson(1996)。Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities。University Press of Virginia。  new window
2.Pielou, E. C.(1969)。An introduction to mathematical ecology。New York：John Wiley and sons。  new window
3.Magurran, A. E.(1988)。Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement。London：Croom Helm。  new window
4.Brillouin, L.(1956)。Science and Information Theory。New York：Academic Press。  new window
5.Egghe, Leo、Rousseau, Ronald(1990)。Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science。Elsevier。  new window
6.Klein, J. T.(1990)。Interdisciplinary History, Theory, and Practice。Detroit：Wayne State University Press。  new window
7.Crane, Diana(1972)。Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities。University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.Organization for economic co-operation and development(1998)。Interdisciplinary in science and technology. Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry。Paris：Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：633（臺灣：632，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2017497 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67830951
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上