:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:智慧財產權侵權警告函正、負向效應與競爭效能關聯:智慧財產權類型的干擾角色
書刊名:管理評論
作者:施錦村 引用關係
作者(外文):Shih, Chin-tsun
出版日期:2011
卷期:30:2
頁次:頁97-116
主題關鍵詞:智慧財產權警告函競爭效能競爭效應Intellectual property rightsInfringement noticeCompetitive efficiencyCompetitive effect
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:28
  • 點閱點閱:74
本研究旨在驗證智慧財產權侵權警告函正、負向效應與競爭效能的關聯,及不同類別對競爭效能的干擾角色,有别於過去智慧財產權及競爭法相關文獻,集中探討二者間之法律關係。本研究177 件樣本來自台灣公平會1995 年至2009 年的案例,該等案例經由相關統計分析工具驗證,實證結果為:(一)實證模型中正向結構係數大於負向結構係數;(二)不同類型有不同的競爭效能,其高低依序為商標權、著作權及專利權。以上實證結果,可供實務界及競爭法主管機關處理類似案件時參考。
This paper aims to validate the relationships among positive, negative effect and competitive efficiency on the infringement notice of intellectual property, and the moderating role of categories to competitive efficiency. The study is different from previous related documents of intellectual property and competitive law, which were concerned only with law relationships. A research sample of 177 cases, from 1995 to 2009, is sourced from the Taiwan Fair Trade Commission, and statistical analysis is conducted for validation. The results confirm that a positive structural coefficient of the empirical model is superior to the negative coefficient. Also, the different categories of property rights tend to produce different competitive efficiencies, namely, a trademark, a copyright, and a patent. The findings can provide references to business and authorities of competition law for handling similar cases.
期刊論文
1.許忠信(20080700)。智慧財產權侵害警告函之比較法觀察--以美國法與德國法之比較為中心。公平交易季刊,16(3),53-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王敏銓(2008)。美國之智慧財產權法與競爭法互動綜觀。全國律師,12(1),63-70。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kaminski, Michael D.(2006)。Effective of US Patent Litigation。Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal,18(1),13-25。  new window
4.黃惠敏(2008)。智慧財產權之行使與公平交易法之界線。全國律師,12(1),79-93。  延伸查詢new window
5.Besen, S. M.、Raskind, L. J.(1991)。An introduction to the law and economics of intellectual property。Journal of Economic Perspectives,5(1),3-27。  new window
6.Subhash, S.、Durand, R. M.、Gur-Arie, O.(1981)。Identification and Analysis of Moderate Variable。Journal of Marketing Research,18(3),291-299。  new window
7.Adams, Charles W.(2006)。A Brief History of Indirect Liability for Patent Infringement。Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal,22,369-385。  new window
8.Kassarjian, Harold H.、Kassarjian, Waltraud M.(19880900)。The Impact of Regulation on Advertising: A Content Analysis。Journal of Consumer Policy,11(3),269-285。  new window
9.熊誦梅(20081000)。不當行使專利權之法律效果及救濟途徑--從美國法上之專利地痞、專利濫用及智慧財產授權準則談起。全國律師,12(10),56-67。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃銘傑(20030900)。智慧財產侵害警告函與公平交易法之適用--專利權權利行使之意義與界限。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,32(5),119-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.盧瑞陽、余朝權、林金郎、張家琳(20060700)。臺灣不法比較廣告之研究--2004年案例研析。公平交易季刊,14(3),27-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Bernstein, Debra、Ganske, Rod(2009)。Lessons Learned When the Antitrust and Intellectual Property Laws Collide。Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal,21(1)。  new window
13.Elhauge, Einer(1992)。Making Sense of Antitrust Petitioning Immunity。California Law Review,80。  new window
14.Krattenmaker, Thomas G.、Salop, Steven C.(1986)。Anticompetitive Exclusion: Raising Rivals' Costs to Achieve Power over Price。Yale Law Journal,96(2),209-293。  new window
15.許忠信(20081000)。智慧財產權之濫用與限制競爭防止法之適用--由美國法與日本法看我國公平交易法第四十五條。全國律師,12(10),5-26。  延伸查詢new window
16.Hoelter, J. W.(1983)。The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices。Sociological Methods and Research,11(3),325-344。  new window
17.劉國讚(20060900)。侵害智慧財產權之警告與不公平競爭--以日本不正競爭防止法為中心。智慧財產權月刊,93,31-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Bentler, Paul M.、Chou, Chih-ping(1987)。Practical Issues in Structural Modeling。Sociological Methods and Research,16(1),78-117。  new window
19.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94。  new window
20.施錦村(20090100)。比較廣告不同類別對衝突性利益與競爭效能關聯的干擾角色。管理與系統,16(1),99-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Janis, Mark D.(2002)。Transition in IP and Antitrust。Antitrust Bulletin,47(2/3),253-283。  new window
22.Balto, David A.、Wolman, Andrew M.(2006)。Intellectual Property and Antitrust: General Principle。The Journal of Law and Technology,13,424-435。  new window
23.Brandenburger, Rachel、Cauwelaert, Alicia V.(2008)。The Interface between IP Right and European Antitrust Law。The Computer & Internet Lawyer,25(7),21-25。  new window
24.Calkins, Stephen(1988)。Development in Antitrust and the First Amendment: The Disaggregation of Noerr。Antitrust Law Journal,57,327-339。  new window
25.First, Harry(2007)。Controlling the Intellectual Grab: Protect Innovation, Not Innovators。Rutgers Law Journal,38,358-370。  new window
26.Klasina, Hara(2003)。EC Competition Law and Intellectual Property Right: The Regulation of Innovation。International Journal of Law and Information Technology,11(1),101-102。  new window
27.Kremer, Michael(1998)。Patent Buyouts: A Mechanism for Encouraging Innovation。Quarterly Journal of Economics,113,513-533。  new window
28.Lanjouw, Jean O.、Mark Schankerman(2001)。Characteristic of Patent Litigation: A Window on Competition。The Rand Journal of Economics,32(1),129-151。  new window
29.McGowan, David(2008)。What Tool Works Tells Us about Tailoring Patent Misuse Remedies。Northwest University Law Review,102(1),421-428。  new window
30.Peritz, Rudolph J. R.(2008)。The Roberts Court after Two Year: Antitrust, Intellectual Right, and Competition Policy。Antitrust Bulletin,53(1),153-178。  new window
31.Posner, Richard A.(2005)。Intellectual Property: The Law and Economics Approach。The Journal of Economic Perspective,19(2),57-73。  new window
32.Shavells Steven、Tanguy Van Ypersele(2001)。Reward versus Intellectual Property Right。Journal of Law and Economics,44,525-547。  new window
33.Winter, Sidney G.(1993)。Patent and Welfare in an Evolutionary Model。Industrial and Corporate Change,2(2),211-231。  new window
34.Rubin, Jonathan L.(2007)。Patent, Antitrust, and Rivalry in Standard Setting。Rutgers Law Journal,33,509-511。  new window
圖書
1.Cohen, Julie、Gleason, Thomas(1990)。Social Research in Communication and Law。Newbury Park:Free Press。  new window
2.黃銘傑(2006)。競爭法與智慧財產權法之交會-相生與相剋之間。臺北市:元照出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Cooper, Donald. R.、Schindler, Pamla S.(2001)。Business Research Method。Singapore。  new window
4.行政院公平交易委員會(2007)。認識公平交易法。臺北:行政院公平交易委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hair, Joseph F.、Anderson, Rolph E.、Tatham, Ronald L.、Black, William C.(1998)。Multivariable data analysis。Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:London:Prentice hall international:Prentice hall international。  new window
6.Weber, Robert Philip(1985)。Basic Content Analysis。Sage Publications Inc.。  new window
7.Bollen, K. A.(1989)。Structural Equation Modeling with Latent Variables。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
8.吳萬益(2008)。企業研究方法。臺北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Jöreskog, Karl G.、Sörbom, Dag(1993)。LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language。Scientific Software International。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE