資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.220.244.7)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
英美法國家對吹哨者合法爆料行為之認定:評最高法院98年臺上字第1042號判決
書刊名:
台灣勞動評論
作者:
謝棋楠
作者(外文):
Xie, Qi-nan
出版日期:
2011
卷期:
3:1
頁次:
頁35-76
主題關鍵詞:
吹哨者
;
忠實義務
;
公共利益
;
Whistle-blower
;
Duty to loyalty
;
Public interest
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
2
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
2
共同引用:0
點閱:75
最高法院98年臺上字第1042號判決,因勞工舉行記者會,以言詞及張貼標語方式主動爆料並蓄意抨擊其公司收取管線補助為不義之財,認為其破壞與公司間之信賴關係,而認定公司之懲戒解雇成立。 吹哨者保護制度牽涉言論自由、個別勞工忠實義務與社會對政府或事業單位監控之公共利益(Public Interest)。而對吹哨者之保護,牽涉到如何平衡個別勞工應對雇主負忠實義務之私人利益及監督與防制政府或事業單位之違法不當行為之公共利益。 近年因美國恩隆案(Enron Corporation)發生,主要英美法系國家,美、加、英、澳等國之立法,皆加強吹哨者保護與義務。內部人員之爆料或報告,有助於盡早偵知不法行為,而減少公眾監督與調查之必要成本。近例如,美國沙賓法(Sarbanes-Oxley Act)與英國公共利益揭露法皆予規範。各規定之合法爆料行為之要件不一,有強制要求需符先在雇主內部循管道向上報告之要件者。也有強制指定爆料對象應限於能匡正該不法事宜者之官方機關者。爆料行為爭議案件之審查,應著重客觀合理性,一併考量相關互為衝突之利害事務之價值,在對爆料行為之公益上與忠實義務私利上之價值判斷需保持中立性。
以文找文
Supreme Court’s decision of 2009 Tai Shan No. 1042 involves a whistle-blowing action by employee disclosing to media its employer’s extra charge on customers in the name of pipe-subsidy fee. The court approved its employer’s discharge action on the reason that the duty of loyalty has been breached. Whistleblowing is viewed as a mechanism to serve public interest in the societal control over government and large organizations. Whistleblowers have people become aware of institutional commission of illegal acts and alert general public and law enforcement officials. However, it is a delima that employees’ duty to loyalty may be absued for furtherance of personal interests during the process of whistle-blowing. Article 30 of our Labor Safety and Health Act provides similar stipulations. In common law countries, more whistle-blowing legislations have been enacted to protect the whistle-blowers, due to the aftermath of Enron collapse, for instance, Sarbanes-Oxley Act of the US and Public Interest Disclosure Act of UK. After reviewing the whistle-blowing legislations of the US, UK, Australia and Canada, the author finds that Taiwan is extremely short of whistle-blowing legislations. Even though there is no law governing the necessity in protecting whistle-blower, the courts should use their power to grant more concerns on balancing the public interest and private interest of the employers.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Jos, Philip H.、Tompkins, Mark E.、Hays, Steven W.(1989)。In Praise of Difficult People: A Portrait of the Committed Whistleblower。Public Administration Review,49(6),552-561。
2.
Berle, Joelle A.(2007)。Note & Comment: Attorney-Client Privileges Of In-House Counsel In The United States And Canada。Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas,13,459-478。
3.
Braxton, Toni J.(2004)。How to Prepare Yourselfand Your Client for Potential Retaliation in Employment Discrimination Cases。Alabama Law Review,65,323-330。
4.
Dworkin, Terry Morehead、David Lewis(2004)。Whistleblowing: Australian, U.K., and U.S. Approaches to Disclosure in the Public Interest。Virginia Journal of International Law,44,879-912。
5.
Chicago Bar Record(1984)。How to Identify Employment Discrimination Retaliation Claims。Chicago Bar Record,66,168。
6.
Chohan, Raj(2008)。Survey: Tenth Circuit Interpretations Of Garcetti: Limits On First Amendment Protections For Whistleblowers。Denver University Law Review,85,573-597。
7.
Corbett, William R.(1998)。Of Babies, Bathwater, And Throwing Out Proof Structures: It Is Not Time To Jettison Mcdonnell Douglas。Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal,2,361-393。
8.
Corbo, Joan(1994)。Kraus v. New Rochelle Hosp. Medical Ctr.: Are Whistleblowers Finally Getting The Protection They Need。Hofstra Labor Law Journal,12,141-162。
9.
Dellatore, Carolyn(2008)。Note: Blowing The Whistle On Cepa: Why New Jersey's Conscientious Employee Protection Act Has Gone Too Far。Seton Hall Legislative Journal,32,375-400。
10.
Gorod, Brianne J.(2007)。Rejecting Reasonableness: A New Look At Title VII's Anti-Retaliation Provision。American University Law Review,56,1469-1523。
11.
Lewis, David(2001)。Whistleblowing at Work: On What Principles Should Legislation Be Based。Industrial Law Journal,30(2),169-193。
12.
McKay, Jennifer(1996)。The Public Interest or Improper Use of Information - The Dilemma for the Insider Environmental Whistleblower。Australian Business Law Review,24,319-322。
13.
Qusqas, Firas、Kleiner, Brian H.(2001)。The Difficulties of Whistlers Finding Employment。Management Research News,24(3/4),97-100。
14.
Ramirez, Mary Kreiner(2007)。Blowing The Whistle On Whistleblower Protection: A Tale of Reform Versus Power。University of Cincinnati Law Review,76,183-233。
15.
Richard Evans(1994)。When Honesty Doesn't Pay。Law Institute Journal,68(6),459-461。
16.
Ruff, Jason E.(2006)。Sex Discrimination in the Workplace Across the Atlantic: A Comparison of Burdens of Proof in the United States and the United Kingdom。Penn State International Law Review,24,865-896。
17.
Snell, Ann Clarke、Eskow, Lisa R.(1998)。What Motivates the Ultimate Decisionmaker? An Analysis of Legal Standards for Proving Causation and Malice in Employment Retaliation Suits。Baylor Law Review,50,381-413。
18.
Zion, Eric M. D.(2001)。Overcoming Adversity: Distinguishing Retaliation from General Prohibitions under Federal Employment Discrimination Law。Indiana Law Journal,76,191-219。
19.
Bowman, J. S.(1983)。Whistle Blowing: Literature and Resource Material。Public Administration Review,43(3),87-95。
20.
Keenan, John P.(2002)。Comparing Indian and American Managers on Whistleblowing。Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal,14(2/3),79-89。
21.
Near, Janet P.、Miceli, Marcia P.(1985)。Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistle-Blowing。Journal of Business Ethics,4(1),1-16。
會議論文
1.
Maria, William De(2002)。The Victorian Whistleblower Protection Act Patting the Paws of Corruption? Paper given to Staff Seminar。Staff Seminar Department of Business Law and Taxation。Monash University。
圖書
1.
Haggard, Thomas R.、Robinson, David W.(2001)。Understanding Employment Discrimination。New York:LexisNexis。
2.
McDonald, Janis、Ravitch, Frank S.、Pamela Sumners(2006)。Employment Discrimination Law- Problems, Cases, and Critical Perspectives。Pearson:Prentice Hall。
3.
Twomey, David P.(2004)。Labor and Employment Law: Text and Cases。Mason:Thomson South-WesternWest。
4.
Hirschman, Albert O.(1970)。Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States。Harvard University Press。
其他
1.
何榮幸(20100804)。我見我思--說真話的代價。
延伸查詢
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
公益通報法制之研究--以受僱者權益保障為中心
2.
工會行動權之法理與言論自由之界限
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
流轉與遞變:烏來泰雅族袓靈祭儀實踐的例子
2.
遺址與城鄉觀光發展策略研究:新北市十三行遺址與澎湖七美史前石器製造場遺址群案例
3.
「雞」圖像在中國歷代民間藝術與文化之內涵
4.
清代嘉興地區藝術發展概述:以嘉禾八子為例
5.
書寫作為一種社會實踐的意義--論吳音寧的農村書寫
6.
「國立臺灣圖書館」藏《八千卷樓藏書目》 初稿複印本考述
7.
明季學者馮琦與西洋傳教士利瑪竇之間的交流初探
8.
晚明鄭瑄《昨非庵日纂》的流傳與影響
9.
戲文中的「合」字標註意涵--以《永樂大典戲文三種》為例
10.
陶淵明〈歸去來兮辭〉修辭藝術探微
11.
論中國古代寒食民俗中的「秋千」活動
12.
Celebrating & Sustaining Indigenous Knowledge through Research
13.
重新檢討原住民自製獵槍之管制與處罰
14.
論兩人權公約中原住民狩獵權漁業權的內涵
15.
獵人學校中的形塑文化--以臺東鸞山、拉勞藍部落、花蓮水璉部落為例
QR Code