:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Gender Mainstreaming in a Liberal Democracy: A Rawlsian Feminist Defense
書刊名:東吳哲學學報
作者:陸品妃
作者(外文):Lu, Pin-fei
出版日期:2012
卷期:26
頁次:頁85-108
主題關鍵詞:性別主流化羅爾斯式政治自由主義女性主義政治責任自由多元民主制的公民權Gender mainstreamingRawlsian political liberalismFeminismPolitical dutiesCitizenship in a pluralistic and liberal democracy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:136
促成女人與男人平等的策略之一即是廣為全球採納的性別主流化。然而,性別主流化實施一段時日後的今天,它不僅被批評對於弭平性別不正義無甚效果,也引起吾人對於它所帶來深具影響力的政策與自由民主的公民權之間相容與否之憂。我將在此文探討如何適有效而且自由地運用性別主流化的方法。首先論說,若要在多元民主體制中透過性別主流化政策達成婦女享有的實質平等,一項決定性的關鍵即須仰賴公民遵守一如植基於羅爾斯政治自由主義的最低要求規範,也就是,每個人擔負之尊重所有公民為自由又平等的個政治責任。然後再接著討論,個別公民認可這項最低要求責任如何得以解消自由民主公民權與性別主流化之間表面的緊張,即如何將它們之間轉致為有效的合諧關係。
Gender mainstreaming is adopted globally as a strategy for enhancing women's equality. However, gender mainstreaming is not only criticized as ineffective in redressing gender injustices, but it also causes concern regarding the compatibility of its influential policies with citizenship in a liberal democracy. In this paper, I explore methods for applying gender mainstreaming that are suitably effective and liberal. Thus, I first argue that the achievement of women's substantive equality in a pluralistic democracy through a policy of gender mainstreaming is crucially dependent on citizens following a minimalist norm based on John Rawls' political liberalism, that is, the personal political duty of each person is to respect all citizens as free and equal. Then, I discuss how the recognition of this minimalist duty can resolve the apparent tension between citizenship in a liberal democracy and gender mainstreaming, aligning them in effective harmony.
期刊論文
1.Baehr, Amy R.(2004)。Feminist Politics and Feminist Pluralism: Can We Do Feminist Political Theory without Theories of Gender?。Journal of Political Philosophy,12(4),411-436。  new window
2.Okin, Susan Moller(1994)。Political liberalism, justice, and gender。Ethics,105(1),23-43。  new window
3.Okin, Susan Moller(2004)。Justice and Gender: An Unfinished Debate。Fordham Law Review,72(5),1537-1567。  new window
4.Okin, Susan Moller(2005)。'Forty Acres and a Mule' for Women: Rawls and Feminism。Politics, Philosophy & Economics,4(2),233-248。  new window
5.Fausto-Sterling, Anne(1993)。The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough?。The Sciences,33(2),20-24。  new window
6.Haslanger, Sally(2001)。Gender and Race: (What) Are They, (What) Do We Want Them to Be?。Noûs,34(1),31-55。  new window
7.Haslanger, S.(2003)。Future Genders? Future Races?。Philosophic Exchange,34,4-27。  new window
8.Minow, M.(1991)。Equalities。Journal of Philosophy,88(11),633-644。  new window
9.Okin, S. M.(1998)。Feminism and Multiculturalism: Some Tensions。Ethics,108(4),661-684。  new window
10.Young, I.(2001)。Equality of Whom? Social Groups and Judgments of Injustice。The Journal of Political Philosophy,9(1),1-18。  new window
圖書
1.Fausto-Sterling, Anne(2000)。Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality。Basic Books。  new window
2.Rawls, John(2001)。Justice as Fairness: A Restatement。Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Okin, Susan Moller(1989)。Justice, Gender, and the Family。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
4.Okin, Susan Moller(1979)。Women in Western Political Thought。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
5.Rawls, John(2005)。Political liberalism。Columbia University Press。  new window
6.Tong, R.(2008)。Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction。Boulder, Colorado。  new window
7.Annas, J.(1993)。Women and the Quality of Life: Two Norms or One?。The Quality of Life。Oxford。  new window
8.Cudd, A. E.(2002)。Rational Choice Theory and the Lessons of Feminism。A Mind of One’s Own。Boulder, Colorado。  new window
9.Scanlon, T.(1996)。The Diversity of Objections to Inequality。Lindley Lecture。Lawrence, KS。  new window
10.Okin, S.(1991)。Gender, the Public, and the Private。Feminism and Politics。Oxford。  new window
其他
1.United Nations(1997)。Report of the Economic and Social Council for 1997, (A/52/3.18),http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/GMS.PDF, 20101115。  new window
圖書論文
1.Sen, A.(1995)。Gender Inequality and Theories of Justice。Women, Culture, and Development。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE