:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:家戶主要清潔者的蟲媒相關知識與環境風險知覺--高雄市不同登革熱流行程度社區之比較
書刊名:臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者:李芳盈蔡瑜珍丁志音
作者(外文):Li, Fang-yingTsai, Yue-chenLew-Ting, Chih-yin
出版日期:2012
卷期:31:4
頁次:頁336-346
主題關鍵詞:登革熱環境風險知覺孳生源殺蟲劑使用戶外環境DengueEnvironmental risk perceptionBreeding sitesPesticide useOutdoor environment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:30
目標:本研究之目的為瞭解並比較不同登革熱流行程度社區之居民對登革熱相關的認知與環境風險知覺。方法:本研究為一橫斷性的調查。首先將高雄市所有的里按登革熱的流行程度區分為高、中、低三種層次的組別,之後再以等距抽樣於三組中各抽出兩個里進行家戶資料收集,並特別挑選家戶主要清潔者進行面訪。結果:總計訪問598個家戶。研究結果顯示,高流行程度社區的居民對登革熱相關蟲媒知識有一定程度的了解,且對於登革熱的流行與被感染的可能有所意識,然而他們卻仍低估家戶外環境不佳將導致的風險。相對的,低流行社區的居民雖然自覺最不受到登革熱的威脅,但仍最為戒慎恐懼,且認為疾病防治需同時從環境與自我防護著手。而中流行社區之民眾的知識最差,對登革熱的流行也最不憂心,且他們在疾病防治上相當依賴政府的噴藥措施。結論:處於登革熱流行程度不同社區之民眾,對登革熱蟲媒相關認知與環境風險知覺確有不同,登革熱的預防與控制應該設計因地制宜的介入方案。
Objectives: To examine and compare vector-related knowledge and the perceptions of environmental risk among residents living in communities exposed to different levels of dengue attack. Methods: This study was a cross sectional survey. The magnitude of the dengue epidemic was calculated for all communities (Li, the basic administrative unit) in Kaohsiung City and was further differentiated into three levels (low, medium, and high). Two communities were selected from each level by systematic sampling. Interviews were carried out with the person responsible for domestic hygiene in each household. Results: A total of 598 valid household interviews were conducted (low=194, median=200, high=204). Residents with a high level of dengue attack were knowledgeable about dengue vectors. They were also conscious of the possible adverse effects of dengue infection; however, they tended to pay inadequate attention to the outdoor environment. In contrast, residents in low magnitude communities perceived the least threat of dengue, but they were the most alert, and believed in the dual necessity of environmental management and self-protection to prevent dengue. For respondents residing in communities of a medium magnitude of epidemic risk, their vector-related knowledge was the poorest and they had the least anxiety about dengue infection. They also believed that the use of pesticides by the government was the most efficient strategy for fighting against dengue. Conclusions: Vector-related knowledge and the environmental risk perceptions for dengue varied with the severity of neighborhood dengue epidemics. Strategies for dengue prevention and control should be developed and tailored to the needs of residents based on the risk of dengue attack.
期刊論文
1.Wang, C.H.、Chang, N.T.、Wu, H.H.、Ho, C.M.(200006)。Integrated control of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in Liu-Chiu Village, Ping-Tung County, Taiwan。J Am Mosq Control Assoc,16(2),93-99。  new window
2.Lin, C.M.、Lien, J.C.、Yang, M.C.(1992)。南部七縣市居民對登革熱防治的知識態度及行為之調查研究。公共衛生,19,178-190。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hong, Y.J.、Liang, S.C.、Wu, L.S.、Chang, C.T.、Pai, H.H.(1998)。大高雄地區民眾對登革熱防治之認知與態度。高雄醫誌,14(Suppl),S1-S10。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hwang, J.S.(2005)。社區環境管理與登革熱流行關係之研究。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌,25,109-124。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hwang, K.P.(2002)。高雄市登革熱血清流行病學調查與防治策略。台灣醫界,45,449-451。  延伸查詢new window
6.Lou, M.L.(2003)。登革熱流行期間民眾相關的知識、態度及預防行為。台灣醫學,7,689-700。  延伸查詢new window
7.Gubler, D. J.(2002)。Epidemic dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever as a public health, social and economic problem in the 21st century。Trends Microbiol,10,100-103。  new window
8.Ooi, E.E.、Gubler, D. J.(2009)。Global spread of epidemic dengue: the inluence of environmental change。Future Virol,4,571-580。  new window
9.Mathers, C. D.、Ezzati, M.、Lopez, A. D.(2007)。Measuring the burden of neglected tropical diseases: the global burden of disease framework。PLoS Negl Trop Dis,1,e114。  new window
10.Tseng, W. C.、Chen, C.C.、Chang, C. C.、Chu, T. H.(2009)。Estimating the economic impacts of climate change on infectious diseases: a case study on dengue fever in Taiwan。Clim Change,92,123-140。  new window
11.Sutherst, R. W.(2004)。Global change and human vulnerability to vector-borne diseases。Clin Microbiol Rev,17,136-173。  new window
12.Dutta, P.、Mahanta, J.(2006)。Potential vectors of dengue and the profile of dengue in the North-Eastern Region of India: an epidemiological perspective。Dengue Bull,30,234-242。  new window
13.Wang, C.H.、Roam, G.D.(1994)。Dengue vector control in the urban environment of Taiwan。Kaohsiung J Med Sci,10(Suppl),S28-S32。  new window
14.Tuan, Y.C.、Wang, Y.Z.、Huang, C.C.et al.(2011)。An analysis of the implementation of the Source Reduction Program in response to 2010 dengue epidemic。Epidemiol Bull,27,164-176。  new window
15.Perez-Guerra, C.L.、Seda, H.、Garcia-Rivera, E.J.、Clark, G.G.(2005)。Knowledge and attitudes in Puerto Rico concerning dengue prevent ion。Pan Am J Public Health,17,243-253。  new window
16.Kay, B.、Nam, S.(2005)。New strategy against Aedes aegypti in Vietnam。Lancet,365,316-317。  new window
17.Gubler, D.J.(1998)。Resurgent vector-borne diseases as a global health problem。Emerg Infect Dis,4,442-450。  new window
18.Spiegel, J.、Bennett, S.、Hattersley, L.(2005)。Barriers and bridges to prevention and control of dengue: the need for a social-ecological approach。EcoHealth,2,273-90。  new window
19.Espinoza-Gomez, F.、Hernandez-Suarez, C.M.、Coll-Cardenas, R.(2002)。Educational campaign versus malathion spraying for the control of Aedes aegypti in Colima, Mexico。J Epidemiol Community Health,56,148-152。  new window
20.Rosenbaum, J.、Nathan, M.B.、Ragoonanansingh, R.(1995)。Community participation in dengue prevention and control: a survey of knowledge, attitudes, and practice in Trinidad and Tobago。Am J Trop Med Hyg,53,111-117。  new window
21.Ault, S.K.(1994)。Environmental management: a re-emerging vector control strategy。Am J Trop Med Hyg,50(6 Suppl),35-49。  new window
22.Nathan, M.B.、Lloyd, L.、Wiltshire, A.(2004)。Community participation in environmental management for dengue vector control: experiences from the English-speaking Caribbean。Dengue Bull,28(Suppl),13-16。  new window
23.Blok, A.、Jensen, M.、Kaltoft, P.(2008)。Social identities and risk: expert and lay imaginations on pesticide use。Public Understand Sci,17,189-209。  new window
24.Lehman, P.K.、Geller, E.S.(2004)。Behavior analysis and environmental protection: accomplishments and potential for more。Behav Soc Issues,13,13-32。  new window
25.Sanchez, L.、Perez, D.、Perez, T.(2005)。Intersectoral coordination in Aedes aegypti control. A pilot project in Havana City, Cuba。Trop Med Int Health,10,82-91。  new window
研究報告
1.Luo, Y.P.(2004)。南部地區幼稚園教師對登革熱防治問卷調查。台南。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Lin, C.C.(2010)。台灣南部地區民眾登革熱傳染病防治的知識、態度及行為意向調查研究。國立高雄師範大學,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Coreil, J.、Bryant, C.A.、Henderson, N.(2001)。Social and Behavioral Foundations of Public Health。California。  new window
其他
1.衛生福利部疾病管制署(2015)。傳染病統計資料查詢系統,http://nidss.cdc.gov.tw/, 2015/01/20。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE