資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.226.226.83)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
家戶主要清潔者的蟲媒相關知識與環境風險知覺--高雄市不同登革熱流行程度社區之比較
書刊名:
臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者:
李芳盈
/
蔡瑜珍
/
丁志音
作者(外文):
Li, Fang-ying
/
Tsai, Yue-chen
/
Lew-Ting, Chih-yin
出版日期:
2012
卷期:
31:4
頁次:
頁336-346
主題關鍵詞:
登革熱
;
環境風險知覺
;
孳生源
;
殺蟲劑使用
;
戶外環境
;
Dengue
;
Environmental risk perception
;
Breeding sites
;
Pesticide use
;
Outdoor environment
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:30
目標:本研究之目的為瞭解並比較不同登革熱流行程度社區之居民對登革熱相關的認知與環境風險知覺。方法:本研究為一橫斷性的調查。首先將高雄市所有的里按登革熱的流行程度區分為高、中、低三種層次的組別,之後再以等距抽樣於三組中各抽出兩個里進行家戶資料收集,並特別挑選家戶主要清潔者進行面訪。結果:總計訪問598個家戶。研究結果顯示,高流行程度社區的居民對登革熱相關蟲媒知識有一定程度的了解,且對於登革熱的流行與被感染的可能有所意識,然而他們卻仍低估家戶外環境不佳將導致的風險。相對的,低流行社區的居民雖然自覺最不受到登革熱的威脅,但仍最為戒慎恐懼,且認為疾病防治需同時從環境與自我防護著手。而中流行社區之民眾的知識最差,對登革熱的流行也最不憂心,且他們在疾病防治上相當依賴政府的噴藥措施。結論:處於登革熱流行程度不同社區之民眾,對登革熱蟲媒相關認知與環境風險知覺確有不同,登革熱的預防與控制應該設計因地制宜的介入方案。
以文找文
Objectives: To examine and compare vector-related knowledge and the perceptions of environmental risk among residents living in communities exposed to different levels of dengue attack. Methods: This study was a cross sectional survey. The magnitude of the dengue epidemic was calculated for all communities (Li, the basic administrative unit) in Kaohsiung City and was further differentiated into three levels (low, medium, and high). Two communities were selected from each level by systematic sampling. Interviews were carried out with the person responsible for domestic hygiene in each household. Results: A total of 598 valid household interviews were conducted (low=194, median=200, high=204). Residents with a high level of dengue attack were knowledgeable about dengue vectors. They were also conscious of the possible adverse effects of dengue infection; however, they tended to pay inadequate attention to the outdoor environment. In contrast, residents in low magnitude communities perceived the least threat of dengue, but they were the most alert, and believed in the dual necessity of environmental management and self-protection to prevent dengue. For respondents residing in communities of a medium magnitude of epidemic risk, their vector-related knowledge was the poorest and they had the least anxiety about dengue infection. They also believed that the use of pesticides by the government was the most efficient strategy for fighting against dengue. Conclusions: Vector-related knowledge and the environmental risk perceptions for dengue varied with the severity of neighborhood dengue epidemics. Strategies for dengue prevention and control should be developed and tailored to the needs of residents based on the risk of dengue attack.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Wang, C.H.、Chang, N.T.、Wu, H.H.、Ho, C.M.(200006)。Integrated control of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in Liu-Chiu Village, Ping-Tung County, Taiwan。J Am Mosq Control Assoc,16(2),93-99。
2.
Lin, C.M.、Lien, J.C.、Yang, M.C.(1992)。南部七縣市居民對登革熱防治的知識態度及行為之調查研究。公共衛生,19,178-190。
延伸查詢
3.
Hong, Y.J.、Liang, S.C.、Wu, L.S.、Chang, C.T.、Pai, H.H.(1998)。大高雄地區民眾對登革熱防治之認知與態度。高雄醫誌,14(Suppl),S1-S10。
延伸查詢
4.
Hwang, J.S.(2005)。社區環境管理與登革熱流行關係之研究。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌,25,109-124。
延伸查詢
5.
Hwang, K.P.(2002)。高雄市登革熱血清流行病學調查與防治策略。台灣醫界,45,449-451。
延伸查詢
6.
Lou, M.L.(2003)。登革熱流行期間民眾相關的知識、態度及預防行為。台灣醫學,7,689-700。
延伸查詢
7.
Gubler, D. J.(2002)。Epidemic dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever as a public health, social and economic problem in the 21st century。Trends Microbiol,10,100-103。
8.
Ooi, E.E.、Gubler, D. J.(2009)。Global spread of epidemic dengue: the inluence of environmental change。Future Virol,4,571-580。
9.
Mathers, C. D.、Ezzati, M.、Lopez, A. D.(2007)。Measuring the burden of neglected tropical diseases: the global burden of disease framework。PLoS Negl Trop Dis,1,e114。
10.
Tseng, W. C.、Chen, C.C.、Chang, C. C.、Chu, T. H.(2009)。Estimating the economic impacts of climate change on infectious diseases: a case study on dengue fever in Taiwan。Clim Change,92,123-140。
11.
Sutherst, R. W.(2004)。Global change and human vulnerability to vector-borne diseases。Clin Microbiol Rev,17,136-173。
12.
Dutta, P.、Mahanta, J.(2006)。Potential vectors of dengue and the profile of dengue in the North-Eastern Region of India: an epidemiological perspective。Dengue Bull,30,234-242。
13.
Wang, C.H.、Roam, G.D.(1994)。Dengue vector control in the urban environment of Taiwan。Kaohsiung J Med Sci,10(Suppl),S28-S32。
14.
Tuan, Y.C.、Wang, Y.Z.、Huang, C.C.et al.(2011)。An analysis of the implementation of the Source Reduction Program in response to 2010 dengue epidemic。Epidemiol Bull,27,164-176。
15.
Perez-Guerra, C.L.、Seda, H.、Garcia-Rivera, E.J.、Clark, G.G.(2005)。Knowledge and attitudes in Puerto Rico concerning dengue prevent ion。Pan Am J Public Health,17,243-253。
16.
Kay, B.、Nam, S.(2005)。New strategy against Aedes aegypti in Vietnam。Lancet,365,316-317。
17.
Gubler, D.J.(1998)。Resurgent vector-borne diseases as a global health problem。Emerg Infect Dis,4,442-450。
18.
Spiegel, J.、Bennett, S.、Hattersley, L.(2005)。Barriers and bridges to prevention and control of dengue: the need for a social-ecological approach。EcoHealth,2,273-90。
19.
Espinoza-Gomez, F.、Hernandez-Suarez, C.M.、Coll-Cardenas, R.(2002)。Educational campaign versus malathion spraying for the control of Aedes aegypti in Colima, Mexico。J Epidemiol Community Health,56,148-152。
20.
Rosenbaum, J.、Nathan, M.B.、Ragoonanansingh, R.(1995)。Community participation in dengue prevention and control: a survey of knowledge, attitudes, and practice in Trinidad and Tobago。Am J Trop Med Hyg,53,111-117。
21.
Ault, S.K.(1994)。Environmental management: a re-emerging vector control strategy。Am J Trop Med Hyg,50(6 Suppl),35-49。
22.
Nathan, M.B.、Lloyd, L.、Wiltshire, A.(2004)。Community participation in environmental management for dengue vector control: experiences from the English-speaking Caribbean。Dengue Bull,28(Suppl),13-16。
23.
Blok, A.、Jensen, M.、Kaltoft, P.(2008)。Social identities and risk: expert and lay imaginations on pesticide use。Public Understand Sci,17,189-209。
24.
Lehman, P.K.、Geller, E.S.(2004)。Behavior analysis and environmental protection: accomplishments and potential for more。Behav Soc Issues,13,13-32。
25.
Sanchez, L.、Perez, D.、Perez, T.(2005)。Intersectoral coordination in Aedes aegypti control. A pilot project in Havana City, Cuba。Trop Med Int Health,10,82-91。
研究報告
1.
Luo, Y.P.(2004)。南部地區幼稚園教師對登革熱防治問卷調查。台南。
延伸查詢
學位論文
1.
Lin, C.C.(2010)。台灣南部地區民眾登革熱傳染病防治的知識、態度及行為意向調查研究。國立高雄師範大學,高雄。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
Coreil, J.、Bryant, C.A.、Henderson, N.(2001)。Social and Behavioral Foundations of Public Health。California。
其他
1.
衛生福利部疾病管制署(2015)。傳染病統計資料查詢系統,http://nidss.cdc.gov.tw/, 2015/01/20。
延伸查詢
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
無相關期刊論文
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
臺灣民眾與政府的環境正義認知:以高高屏三縣市傳染病防治認知為例
2.
臺灣的中國醫療史之過往與傳承--從熱病史談新進路
3.
全球城市網絡連結形態之探討--以飛機航線為例
4.
臺灣疾病地圖繪製之研究與發展
5.
地理資訊系統應用於傳染流行病的疫情偵測、數據分析與速效控制
QR Code