Both the common law system and the civil law system have its long time develop history. Many commentators argue for which system is better for centuries and without consensus. On the legal history, these two systems based on different jurisprudence and judicial regime, so we can observe the different methodology and practice procedure. But both toward the same aim to maintain case justice. The author believes that these two systems have different advantages and flaws. After a long term practice and argument, we can see that these two systems now revise toward the way of compromise: the civil law system established some flexible clause and the common law system accept some statute code.To uniform the legal system between member states of European Union, how the United Kingdoms' common law legal system integration into the civil law system of most other member states is a key point. As we know, European continental states conduct the legal uniform engineering with a strongly civil code style, the UK is a traditional common law home country with abundant case law and venerable judicial system, whether it is possible to integrate these two systems and maintain stability from civil law system and flexibility from common law system, to approaching toward the ultimate goal of case justice?Unfortunately, at least on the issue of international jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters, European continental states totally exclude the UK common law regime from the uniform jurisdiction regulation. Many recently cases demonstrate that the European Court of Justice gave rulings, include anti-suit injunction, forum conveniens, forum non conveniens, that all of UK flexible jurisdictional regulation, are inconsistent with the EC 44/2001 Council Regulation, and shall not be applicable between member states. Even though some cases show that it's the only way to maintain case justice, the ECJ still totally refuse the UK style flexible jurisdictional rules. This made not only the UK scholars, but also the US commentators, sharply criticize for unfair.This thesis suggest: To maintain the case justice is the highest value, the EU should trying to accept the UK style flexible jurisdictional rules as an adjuvant. The author also find out so many regimes that complementary by mechanical civil statutes and flexible common law rules. The ECJ should allow courts of UK to apply their own traditional flexible common law rule, if ECJ do not trust UK courts; just set up a review procedure to examine will be fine. It's not a difficult problem to check whether the UK courts abuse discretion or not. The EU should retain room for the UK style flexible jurisdictional rules in EU civil law system, and display tolerance of different legal system, this magnanimity will be respectable.