:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:香港高中課程改革:通識教育科的人力成本
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:林智中張爽
作者(外文):Lam, Chi-chungZhang, Shuang
出版日期:2013
卷期:16:1
頁次:頁159-178
主題關鍵詞:高中課程課程改革通識教育人力成本Senior secondary curriculumCurriculum reformLiberal studiesHuman cost
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:60
2009年,香港開始新高中課程改革,一個新的必修科目通識教育科是其中一個重要的改革舉措。本文通過一項質性的研究,從人力成本的角度分析通識教育科從2006年開始推出到2009年正式實施時教師的準備與實施情況。研究發現通識教育的變革是一個包括大量任務成本、社會成本和心理成本的變革,教師實施起來十分困難,需要大量時間與努力;同時變革也改變了原來的教師結構,產生兼教的心態;教師們缺乏自信,產生專業身份的危機。不論通識教育改革能否實現其宏大的教育目標,這一變革需要人力成本的大量投入,對教師和學校來說,都是一個很大的挑戰,也很可能影響改革的可持續性。
Liberal Studies, a new compulsory subject, is probably the most important initiative of the senior secondary curriculum reform implemented in Hong Kong in 2009. This paper reports the findings of a qualitative study which reveals the human costs involved in the preparation and implementation of the subject by schools and teachers from 2006 to 2009. It is found that the implementation of this compulsory subject was very costly, in particular the task cost, social cost and psychological cost. Teachers found putting this new subject into practice is a very difficult task as it demanded much effort and time. The new subject also led to changes in the structure of staffing in schools. Many teachers has to teach a new subject, hence affected their self-confidence and created subject identity crisis. At present stage, it is not sure whether this curriculum change will achieve the ambitious goals. But it definitely demands huge cost. To teachers and schools, this is a huge challenge and the sustainability of the change is questionable.
期刊論文
1.林智中、陳健生(2011)。香港新高中課程處理學習差異的策略及實施。教育研究與發展期刊,7(2),189-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.霍秉坤(2007)。香港通識教育科的理念與實施:社會層面與學校層面之間。香港教師中心學報,55(2),104-121。  延伸查詢new window
3.Deng, Z. Y.(2009)。The formation of a school subject and the nature of curriculum content: An analysis of liberal studies in Hong Kong。Journal of Curriculum Studies,41(5),585-604。  new window
4.King, J. A.(1994)。Meeting the educational needs of at-risk students: A cost analysis of three models。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,16(1),1-19。  new window
5.Rice, Jennifer King(2001)。The cost of working together: A framework for estimating the costs of comprehensive support systems for children。Administration & Society,33(4),455-479。  new window
6.Rice, J. K.、Malen, B.(2003)。The human costs of education reform: The case of school reconstitution。Educational Administration Quarterly,39(5),635-666。  new window
7.林智中、張爽(2005)。通識教育科:水中撈月?。香港教師中心學報,4,35-42。  延伸查詢new window
8.Gitli, A.、Margoni, F.(1995)。The political aspect of reform。The American Journal of Education,103,377-405。  new window
學位論文
1.張爽(2007)。中國大陸統整課程的教師信念:兩所學校的個案研究(博士論文)。香港中文大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Wrigh, N.(2002)。Stories from the inside: A narrative analysis investigating the professional lives of three New Zealand secondary school heads of English departments(博士論文)。University of Waikato,Hamilton。  new window
圖書
1.林智中、陳健生、張爽(2006)。課程組織。北京:教育科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.香港中學校長會(2010)。新高中學制問卷調查報告撮要(2009-2010)。香港:香港中學校長會。  延伸查詢new window
3.香港教育專業人員協會(2010)。通識教育科問卷調查結果。香港:香港教育專業人員協會。  延伸查詢new window
4.香港教育統籌委員會(2000)。香港教育制度改革建議。香港:教育統籌委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.曾榮光(2006)。香港高中通識教育的意義。香港:香港中文大學教育學院、香港教育研究所。  延伸查詢new window
6.趙志成(2007)。新高中課程帶來憂慮與挑戰。香港:香港中文大學教育學院、香港教育研究所。  延伸查詢new window
7.Fullan, M.(2010)。All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform。Thousand Oaks:Corwin & Ontario Principals’ Council。  new window
8.Rothenberg, J.(1975)。Cost-benefit analysis: A methodological exposition。Handbook of evaluation research。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage。  new window
9.周淑卿(2005)。課程發展與教師專業。課程發展與教師專業。臺北市:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
10.香港教育統籌局(2004)。改革高中及高等教育學制--對未來的投資。香港:教育統籌局。  延伸查詢new window
11.香港課程發展議會、香港考試、評核局(2007)。通識教育科課程及評估指引(中四至中六)。香港:香港考試:香港課程發展議會:評核局。  延伸查詢new window
12.Fadel, C.、Trilling, B.(2009)。21st century skills: Learning for life in our times。Jossey-Bass。  new window
13.Fink, D.、Hargreaves, A.(2006)。Sustainable leadership。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
14.Drake, S. M.(1998)。Creating integrated curriculum: Proven ways to increase student learning。Thousand Oaks, California:Corwin Press。  new window
15.Beane, James A.(1997)。Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education。Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
其他
1.周國良(2005)。科大設兼讀通識教育課程。  延伸查詢new window
2.林智中(20041116)。必修通識建基錯誤假設,論壇。  延伸查詢new window
3.張楚勇(2004)。通識教育是精英教育,論壇。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top