Market Structure and Performance: Perspective from Network Analysis of Industry Structure_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	Market Structure and Performance: Perspective from Network Analysis of Industry Structure
書刊名：	中山管理評論
作者：	施信佑
作者(外文)：	Shih, Hsin-yu
出版日期：	2013
卷期：	21:1
頁次：	頁85-121
主題關鍵詞：	產業結構；競爭作用力模型；社會網絡分析；侷限；績效；Industry structure；Competitive forces model；Social network analysis；Constraint；Performance
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:5 點閱:16

本研究提出一個量化模型來衡量影響產業獲利程度的四種競爭作用力，即運用競爭者侷限來衡量現有競爭者之間的競爭態勢、藉由供應商侷限來衡量供應商議價能力、利用客戶侷限來衡量客戶議價能力、最後採用結構同位侷限來衡量潛在競爭者與替代品的威脅。接著以台灣產業結構作為實證資料來源，加以驗證此量化模型之可行性。實證結果顯示這四種競爭作用力對於產業的獲利程度具有顯著影響，換言之，本研究所提出之量化模型，可以用來衡量競爭作用力並且比較他們之間的大小，以及評估各個競爭作用力對產業績效的影響程度。實證結果發現，影響台灣製造產業績效的競爭作用力強度大小依序為結構同位侷限、競爭者侷限、客戶侷限、供應商侷限。

以文找文

This study proposes a quantitative methodology for measuring the four competitive forces which affect industry profitability. More precisely, the proposed model uses the competitor constraint to measure rivalry among existing competitors, the supplier constraint to measure bargaining power of suppliers, the buyer constraint to measure bargaining power of buyers, and the structural equivalence constraint to measure threats of new entrants and substitutes. Then, this study empirically examines a sample of industry structures taken from Taiwan. The analytical results show that the four competitive forces indeed have statistically significant influences on industry profitability. Particularly, the model can quantitatively measure and compare the strength of the competitive forces that drive competition within industries, and estimate the impact of these forces on industry performance. The empirical results show that the sequence of the strength of the competitive forces that govern industry performance in Taiwanese manufacturing sectors is structural equivalence constraint, competitor constraint, buyer constraint, and supplier constraint.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Aktouf, O.,、Chenoufi, M.,、Holford, W. D.(2005)。The false expectations of Michael Porter’s strategic management framework。Problems and Perspectives in Management，4(1)，181-200。
2.	Azen, R.、Budescu, D. V.(2003)。The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression。Psychological Methods，8(2)，129-148。
3.	Brandenburger, A.(2002)。Porter’s added values: High indeed!。Academy of Management Executive，16(2)，58-60。
4.	Budescu, D. V.(1993)。Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression。Psychological Bulletin，114(3)，542-551。
5.	Burt, Ronald. S.(1989)。Another look at the network boundaries of American markets。American Journal of Sociology，95，723-753。
6.	Kadiyali, V.,、Sudhir, K.,、Rao, V.(2001)。Structural analysis of competitive behavior: New empirical industrial organization methods in marketing。International Journal of Research in Marketing，18(1/2)，161-186。
7.	Raider, H. J.(1998)。Market structure and innovation。Social Science Research，27(1)，1-21。
8.	Stephenson, K.、Zelen, M.(1989)。Rethinking centrality: Methods and applications。Social Networks，11(1)，1-37。
9.	Talmud, I.(1994)。Relations and profits: the social organization of Israeli industrial competition。Social Science Research，23(2)，109-135。
10.	Winship, C.(1988)。Thoughts about roles and relations: An old document revisited。Social Networks，10(3)，209-231。
11.	Friedkin, N. E.(1984)。Structural Cohesion and Equivalence Explanations of Social Homogeneity。Sociological Methods & Research，12，235-261。
12.	Lorrain, Francios、White, Harrison C.(1971)。Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks。Journal of Mathematical Sociology，1(1)，49-80。
13.	Mizruchi, Mark S.(1993)。Cohesion, Equivalence, and Similarity of Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Assessment。Social Networks，15(3)，275-307。
14.	Freeman, L.(1978)。Centrality in Social Network: Conceptual Clarification。Social Network，1(3)，215-239。
15.	蘇國賢(19970600)。產業自主性與市場績效--臺灣產業結構的網路分析。中山管理評論，5(2)，315-338。延伸查詢
16.	Freeman, L. C.(1980)。The gatekeeper, pair-dependency, and structural centrality。Quality and Quantity，14(4)，585-592。
17.	Bain, Joe S.(1951)。Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing, 1936-1940。Quarterly Journal of Economics，65(3)，293-324。
18.	Bartlett, C. A.、Ghoshal, S.(2002)。Strategic advantage。Executive Excellence，19(7)，7-8。
19.	Burt, Ronald S.(1987)。Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence。American Journal of Sociology，92(6)，1287-1335。
20.	Cook, K. S.、Emerson, R. M.、Gillmore, M. R.、Yamagishi, T.(1983)。The distribution of power in exchange networks: theory and experimental results。American Journal of Sociology，89(2)，275-305。
21.	Cook, Karen S.、Emerson, Richard M.(1978)。Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks。American Sociological Review，43(5)，721-739。
22.	Porter, Michael E.(1979)。How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy。Harvard Business Review，57(2)，137-145。
23.	Stalk, George、Evans, Philip、Shulman, Lawrence E.(1992)。Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy。Harvard Business Review，70(2)，57-69。
24.	Burt, Ronald S.(1988)。The stability of American markets。American Journal of Sociology，94(2)，356-395。
25.	Prahalad, Coimbatore K.、Hamel, Gary(1990)。The core competence of the corporation。Harvard Business Review，68(3)，79-91。
26.	Granovetter, Mark S.(1973)。The Strength of Weak Ties。American Journal of Sociology，78(6)，1360-1380。
27.	Preston, L. E.、Collins, N. R.(1969)。Price-Cost Margins and Industry Structure。The Review of Economics and Statistics，51(3)，271-286。

會議論文
1.	Klein, J.(2001)。A critique of competitive advantage。Manchester, England。

研究報告
1.	Lahti, A.(2006)。The new industrial organization economics of growth firms in small countries like Finland。

圖書
1.	Everett, M. G.、Borgatti, S. P.(2005)。Extending centrality。Models and methods in social network analysis。New York：Cambridge University Press。
2.	Burt, R. S.,、Guilarte, M.,、Raider, H. J.,、Yasuda, Y.(2002)。Competition, contingency, and the external structure of markets。Advances in Strategic Management。New York：Elsevier。
3.	Directorate-General of Budget(2003)。2001 Industry, and Commerce and Service Census Taiwan-Fukien Area, the Republic of China。Taipei, TW：Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics.。
4.	Directorate-General of Budget(2004)。2001 Input-Output Tables, Taiwan Area, the Republic of China。Taipei, TW：Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics.。
5.	Sorensen, O. J.(1994)。Competitive Advantage of Firms and Nations。Aalborg, DK：Aalborg University Press。
6.	Yasuda, Y.(2005)。Social Organization and Performance Inequality in Japanese and American Markets。Tokyo：Manufacturing Management Research Center.。
7.	Ziegler, R.(1982)。Market Structure and Cooptation。Munich, DE：University of Munich。
8.	Burt, Ronald S.(1983)。Corporate Profits and Cooptation: Networks of Market Constraints and Directorate Ties in the American Economy。Academic Press。
9.	Burt, R. S.(1982)。Toward a Structural Theory of Action。New York：Academic Press。
10.	Degenne, Alain、Forsé, Michel(1999)。Introducing Social Networks。London：Sage Publications。
11.	Wasserman, Stanley、Faust, Katherine(1994)。Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications。Cambridge University Press。
12.	Burt, Ronald S.(1992)。Structural Holes. Cambridge。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。
13.	Bain, Joe Staten(1956)。Barriers to new competition: Their character and consequences in manufacturing industries。Harvard University Press。
14.	Porter, Michael E.(1980)。Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors。Free Press。

圖書論文
1.	Doreian, P.、Batagelj, V.、Ferligoj, A.(2001)。Positional analyses of sociometric data analysis。Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis。New York：Cambridge University Press。
2.	Burt, Ronald S.(2000)。The Network Structure of Social Capital。Research in Organizational Behavior。London。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	深耕、實踐與拓邊：探索臺灣組織與經濟發展的動能
2.	文化創意產業結構與績效之階層線性模式分析
3.	結構網絡的分析及其脈絡
4.	臺灣的組織行為研究：過去、現在、及未來
5.	產業自主性與市場績效--臺灣產業結構的網路分析

1.	資源對隔離程度之影響

1.	台灣的組織行為研究 : 過去、現在及未來

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫